|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
WIR: ‘Special’ Election, Multiple Murdaugh Retrial Filings
The race to replace Lindsey Graham in the U.S. Senate is going off the rails… while a key motions hearing looms in the ‘Retrial of the Century.’
3 comments
I posted this on your YouTube and it is worth pasting here:
At minutes 32:23 to 33:35, you, Will and Jenn are, thank God, ALMOST coming around to what I have been saying and writing for years: Richard Alexandre Murdaugh (“RAM”) could NOT POSSIBLY have been THE or A shooter of Paul or Maggie Murdaugh.
But think of what you said next: RAM’s “actions precipitated what happened.”
Whatever RAM did, whether it was not paying his druggies or keeping the insurance fraud loot all to himself and not sharing it with his willing collaborators in the scheme, does it justify whoever shot Paul and Maggie to have taken their lives?
Justice for Paul and Maggie means finding the real shooter(s) and “cleaner(s).”
But PLEASE be careful with that “third gun” story. It raised my hopes up but worried me that your leaking it would give the anti-RAM forces time to spin it away before it gets validated.
PLEASE release all you know about that third gun. And do not worry about validating me because I have been writing for years that Maggie was shot with ONE OF Paul’s two previously stolen guns.
The truth should not be hidden for fear of validating the long-suffering and now-almost dying Dr. Marie Faltas.
I also wrote this on Nancy Grace’s show where another over-painted guest of hers claimed the only relevance of the DNA under Maggie’s fingernails would have been if her life had been taken by strangulation:
At minute 29:42, you two over-painted women are the ones NOT capable of critical thinking. Maggie could have been fighting off her attacker’s taking her phone off her left hand to prevent her from calling for help.
Also, if, according to your parroting of the Prosecution’s nonsense, Alex took Maggie’s phone and threw it out of his car window: (1) Why did he help law enforcement find it the next morning? and (2) Why did Alex not take Paul’s phone, too, specially that he would have seen Paul make the video with it?
Have you no conscience at all?
I also wrote this on Nancy Grace’s show where another over-painted guest of hers claimed the only relevance of the DNA under Maggie’s fingernails would have been if her life had been taken by strangulation:
At minute 29:42, you two over-painted women are the ones NOT capable of critical thinking. Maggie could have been fighting off her attacker’s taking her phone off her left hand to prevent her from calling for help.
Also, if, according to your parroting of the Prosecution’s nonsense, Alex took Maggie’s phone and threw it out of his car window: (1) Why did he help law enforcement find it the next morning? and (2) Why did Alex not take Paul’s phone, too, specially that he would have seen Paul make the video with it?
Have you no conscience at all?