The big story, FITS, if you dare to publish it, are the $68 million Alan Wilson gave to just two law firms. One is Ken Woodington, a retiree from Wilson’s office. The other is Jean Toal’s brother’s law firm, Willoughby and Heofer.
Even more complicating is that Jim Griffin is representing the public interest foundation opposing that payment.
Would Jean Toal be fair and impartial when at least $34 million to her brother are on the line?
When was Jean Toal EVER fair and impartial when her interests, the interests of her family and/or friends, or simply the interests of someone whose back Jean Toal wanted to scratch today in the hope of that someone scratching Jean Toal’s back tomorrow?
When Jean Toal ran for re-election as SC Chief Justice against Pleicones in 2013-2014, she was pointedly questioned about being “political” and “result-driven,” meaning she will decide ahead of time who should win then manipulate her opinion to justify that result whether that result is the fair one or not.
Yes, she continues to serve after retirement for peanuts in terms of direct payments in return for her court time. But that does not mean she is serving selflessly.
First, she testified in her reconfirmation hearing that she loves it. And there is no reason to doubt that testimony. Some things are stronger to addictions to substances. Can you make a retired maestro stop teaching music, for example, even for free? No; but not entirely for selfless reasons. That is what makes the maestro happy.
The trial court room is what makes Jean Toal happy now.
But something else makes her continue to sit. Without judicial power, she is a has-been and vulnerable to what was done to the trail-blazing Casey Manning and worse.
If you were really that brave, FITS, you would pursue the Jean Toal’s brother’s law firm angle.
I’ll wait to see if you are even brave enough to let this comment through.
I’m not convinced Murdaugh is guilty. I thought the state’s case was a joke. Everyone jumped on the guilty bandwagon because it was salacious and titillating, which always blinds people. If his case had not been famous and had been tried anywhere else in the country besides a small town, he would not have been found guilty with the evidence presented by the prosecution. I was, quite frankly, surprised when the guilty verdict was announced because I felt the prosecution did not meet its burden of proof, so I am not now surprised by the allegations of jury tampering. I honestly believe, over the years, more and more things are going to come to light to show what a sham the entire investigation and trial actually were.
You mean the GPS data from the vehicle that he was driving that puts him at the scene of the murder at the time of the murder? Motive, opportunity + means. Case closed.
No wonder you want to be “Anonymous”, with your opinion that the “prosecution did not meet it’s burden of proof!” If the burden of proof wasn’t met, what in hell would it take for you to understand that it was. If Alex didn’t do it, who did? Why did he lie about being at the murder scene until “Paw Paw’s” video showed up? What happened to the clothes he was wearing the afternoon hours and why did he lie about what time he got home? Why did he attempt to get his mother’s caretaker to lie about the time he was at his parent’s home the night of the murders? Why did he attempt to get their housekeeper to lie? Why did his vehicle slow down at the exact spot on the trip to his mother’s where Maggie’s phone was found? How did he “walk” 300 some odd steps when he was “taking his nap”? How were both guns used to shoot Maggie and Paul, Murdaugh Guns? Why were the shorts and shirt he was wearing when the Police arrived not bloody, no blood, NONE, why? I could go on for two more pages, but what is the point? I suppose in your mind the “Gun Fairy” shot them, or maybe the Easter Bunny, Tooth Fairy or even Santa Claus, what do you think? Thanks for you post though, it was great for a good laugh…….
Okay, B B Brockman! I am NOT anonymous but completely understand anonymous NOT wanting to be insulted by you.
ALL your questions to anonymous misstate the evidence that was presented.
Yes, Alex Murdaugh (“AM”) lied about being at the kennels, just as EVERY secretary LIES and pretends her boss “is in a meeting” when that boss does not want to take that call.
But lying about an irrelevant matter does not a murderer make.
I have repeated that the time of death is MEDICALLY wrong; that the “Murdaugh guns” (if the ballistics were even accurate) were Paul’s previously-stolen expensive guns which THE REAL KILLERS had gotten hold of; and most recently, I discovered that the white shirt had on it spatter of the non-human blood of that chicken Bubba the dog had caught.
That proves conclusively that it was the shirt AM was wearing at the kennels; and since it had no DNA or spatter from Paul, it proves conclusively that AM was not the shooter.
And only stupid people can by the Prosecution’s fairy-tale supposed motive.
No wonder it took a lot of jury tampering for 12 people to buy that nonesense.
Answer ME if you dare.
In all fairness the shirt nor the cheek-in were ever tested to see if there is the possibility of the splatter actually being from the bird. Just wanted to clear that up before there are any further misunderstandings of the clothing Alex wore the night of the murders. Oh and Hi Sub. Nice to see you again lady. Hope all is well with you. I said “hello” to you on YouTube. Just wanted to tell you that was me and not some crazy stalker..? Talk soon!
Hello to you, kind Kidd. YouTube did not send your hello to me; but glad to meet again.
To clarify, the LCV tests for any VERTEBRATE blood, which a bird is a vertebrate. LCV was positive for the spatter area.
The tests for HUMAN blood AND for Paul’s DNA were negative. So, it is a compelling, or at least reasonable, inference that the spatter came from the bird.
Had that shirt been washed, it would have no spatter. So, it is a compelling, or at least reasonable, inference that it was the shirt Alex Murdaugh wore to the kennels and kept on himself to go to see his mother at Almeida.
JustCallMeAva Top fanJanuary 25, 2024 at 9:05 am
Will, are you actually still writing these pieces, or are you just letting Dick & Jim slide you the daily defense talking points in a blatant attempt to taint any potential jury pool? The only real case that the “Dynamic Duo” have is that they put on an inadequate defense. Now, they can’t claim that in a court because they are still on the case and still collecting that sweet, sweet, Murdaugh money. So where is the money to pay these two coming from since they’ve claimed, repeatedly, that Murdaugh is “broke”. Yet somehow, they are still on the case. Do either of these guys remotely strike you as the type that would do anything pro bono? But from a subscriber standpoint, it’s getting beyond tiresome that the only viewpoint presented here (daily) now is from the defense. But I guess this endless stream of drivel is so much easier to post since SLED and the AG’s office aren’t spoonfeeding you their daily talking points like they are.
MICHELE HOLLEY Top fanJanuary 25, 2024 at 11:49 am
Just call me Ava – so you really believe that the defense is using this news outlet as talking points for them? An outlet that has consistently taken the opinion that the defendant AM is exactly where he should be for the murders. I don’t think that is exactly the same viewpoint that the defense has.
The point of this article was to address the clear conflict of interest and impropriety of the States law enforcement and prosecutors having for their star witness in the jury tampering the individual they are purportly investigating and willing to charge. Beyond bizarre.
I’m not shocked and I said this from the beginning. Yall can bet that the state will close or dead docket the supposed “investigation(s)” into all Becky Hill related corruption and illegal activities because it’s a clear conflict. How and why there’s already an evidentiary hearing with Justice Toal on the matter of jury tampering when SLED is still supposedly investigating the tampering, wiretapping, and obstruction charges etc etc related to the tampering, is beyond me?!?! Clearly that all goes away if justice Toal rules against Alex at the hearing on the 29th! How can you have Justice Toal say that there’s no evidence of tampering and then SLED continues the investigation and brings criminal charges for tampering later on down the road. Please give me a break. This is all so stupid. Common sense is not so common. The ethics commission and SLED has had since July 2023 or earlier, who really knows at this point, to come to some sort of finding, conclusions, or charges related to all the evidence they have gathered. How long does it take? Absolutely no updates on either investigation have been provided and y’all can bet that they never will after the 29th evidentiary hearing. Shameful. Do better South Carolina.
Badgering jurors post-verdict to overturn their decision should not be easy to litigate. It is only possible here because the defense lawyer is a major SC political figure with apparently unlimited funding. The SC legal system is extremely friendly to special interests. Prosecutors meeting with Hill may look bad and one can be sure it won’t go unnoticed by the defense team. It is among the minor problems the Murdaugh affair has raised.
If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it is a duck. Murdaugh killed them. Paul didn’t see it coming but when Maggie was running towards the gunshots she saw who was going to murder her. It pains me that this woman knew she was doomed at the hands of her husband who was supposed to protect her. Alex wasn’t up on technology and this is what made him guilty. I wish I could spit on him in his cell and plaster pics of Paul and Maggie all over his cell.
It looks like a frame up for the benefits of Eric Bland’s and Mark Tinsley’s clients; it quacks like a frame up of Alex Murdaugh; it is a frame-up for the enrichment of Eric, Mark and Becky and the election to the governorship of Alan Wilson.
13 comments
The big story, FITS, if you dare to publish it, are the $68 million Alan Wilson gave to just two law firms. One is Ken Woodington, a retiree from Wilson’s office. The other is Jean Toal’s brother’s law firm, Willoughby and Heofer.
Even more complicating is that Jim Griffin is representing the public interest foundation opposing that payment.
Would Jean Toal be fair and impartial when at least $34 million to her brother are on the line?
When was Jean Toal EVER fair and impartial when her interests, the interests of her family and/or friends, or simply the interests of someone whose back Jean Toal wanted to scratch today in the hope of that someone scratching Jean Toal’s back tomorrow?
When Jean Toal ran for re-election as SC Chief Justice against Pleicones in 2013-2014, she was pointedly questioned about being “political” and “result-driven,” meaning she will decide ahead of time who should win then manipulate her opinion to justify that result whether that result is the fair one or not.
Yes, she continues to serve after retirement for peanuts in terms of direct payments in return for her court time. But that does not mean she is serving selflessly.
First, she testified in her reconfirmation hearing that she loves it. And there is no reason to doubt that testimony. Some things are stronger to addictions to substances. Can you make a retired maestro stop teaching music, for example, even for free? No; but not entirely for selfless reasons. That is what makes the maestro happy.
The trial court room is what makes Jean Toal happy now.
But something else makes her continue to sit. Without judicial power, she is a has-been and vulnerable to what was done to the trail-blazing Casey Manning and worse.
If you were really that brave, FITS, you would pursue the Jean Toal’s brother’s law firm angle.
I’ll wait to see if you are even brave enough to let this comment through.
I’m not convinced Murdaugh is guilty. I thought the state’s case was a joke. Everyone jumped on the guilty bandwagon because it was salacious and titillating, which always blinds people. If his case had not been famous and had been tried anywhere else in the country besides a small town, he would not have been found guilty with the evidence presented by the prosecution. I was, quite frankly, surprised when the guilty verdict was announced because I felt the prosecution did not meet its burden of proof, so I am not now surprised by the allegations of jury tampering. I honestly believe, over the years, more and more things are going to come to light to show what a sham the entire investigation and trial actually were.
You mean the GPS data from the vehicle that he was driving that puts him at the scene of the murder at the time of the murder? Motive, opportunity + means. Case closed.
No wonder you want to be “Anonymous”, with your opinion that the “prosecution did not meet it’s burden of proof!” If the burden of proof wasn’t met, what in hell would it take for you to understand that it was. If Alex didn’t do it, who did? Why did he lie about being at the murder scene until “Paw Paw’s” video showed up? What happened to the clothes he was wearing the afternoon hours and why did he lie about what time he got home? Why did he attempt to get his mother’s caretaker to lie about the time he was at his parent’s home the night of the murders? Why did he attempt to get their housekeeper to lie? Why did his vehicle slow down at the exact spot on the trip to his mother’s where Maggie’s phone was found? How did he “walk” 300 some odd steps when he was “taking his nap”? How were both guns used to shoot Maggie and Paul, Murdaugh Guns? Why were the shorts and shirt he was wearing when the Police arrived not bloody, no blood, NONE, why? I could go on for two more pages, but what is the point? I suppose in your mind the “Gun Fairy” shot them, or maybe the Easter Bunny, Tooth Fairy or even Santa Claus, what do you think? Thanks for you post though, it was great for a good laugh…….
Okay, B B Brockman! I am NOT anonymous but completely understand anonymous NOT wanting to be insulted by you.
ALL your questions to anonymous misstate the evidence that was presented.
Yes, Alex Murdaugh (“AM”) lied about being at the kennels, just as EVERY secretary LIES and pretends her boss “is in a meeting” when that boss does not want to take that call.
But lying about an irrelevant matter does not a murderer make.
I have repeated that the time of death is MEDICALLY wrong; that the “Murdaugh guns” (if the ballistics were even accurate) were Paul’s previously-stolen expensive guns which THE REAL KILLERS had gotten hold of; and most recently, I discovered that the white shirt had on it spatter of the non-human blood of that chicken Bubba the dog had caught.
That proves conclusively that it was the shirt AM was wearing at the kennels; and since it had no DNA or spatter from Paul, it proves conclusively that AM was not the shooter.
And only stupid people can by the Prosecution’s fairy-tale supposed motive.
No wonder it took a lot of jury tampering for 12 people to buy that nonesense.
Answer ME if you dare.
In all fairness the shirt nor the cheek-in were ever tested to see if there is the possibility of the splatter actually being from the bird. Just wanted to clear that up before there are any further misunderstandings of the clothing Alex wore the night of the murders. Oh and Hi Sub. Nice to see you again lady. Hope all is well with you. I said “hello” to you on YouTube. Just wanted to tell you that was me and not some crazy stalker..? Talk soon!
Hello to you, kind Kidd. YouTube did not send your hello to me; but glad to meet again.
To clarify, the LCV tests for any VERTEBRATE blood, which a bird is a vertebrate. LCV was positive for the spatter area.
The tests for HUMAN blood AND for Paul’s DNA were negative. So, it is a compelling, or at least reasonable, inference that the spatter came from the bird.
Had that shirt been washed, it would have no spatter. So, it is a compelling, or at least reasonable, inference that it was the shirt Alex Murdaugh wore to the kennels and kept on himself to go to see his mother at Almeida.
Will, are you actually still writing these pieces, or are you just letting Dick & Jim slide you the daily defense talking points in a blatant attempt to taint any potential jury pool? The only real case that the “Dynamic Duo” have is that they put on an inadequate defense. Now, they can’t claim that in a court because they are still on the case and still collecting that sweet, sweet, Murdaugh money. So where is the money to pay these two coming from since they’ve claimed, repeatedly, that Murdaugh is “broke”. Yet somehow, they are still on the case. Do either of these guys remotely strike you as the type that would do anything pro bono? But from a subscriber standpoint, it’s getting beyond tiresome that the only viewpoint presented here (daily) now is from the defense. But I guess this endless stream of drivel is so much easier to post since SLED and the AG’s office aren’t spoonfeeding you their daily talking points like they are.
Just call me Ava – so you really believe that the defense is using this news outlet as talking points for them? An outlet that has consistently taken the opinion that the defendant AM is exactly where he should be for the murders. I don’t think that is exactly the same viewpoint that the defense has.
The point of this article was to address the clear conflict of interest and impropriety of the States law enforcement and prosecutors having for their star witness in the jury tampering the individual they are purportly investigating and willing to charge. Beyond bizarre.
I’m not shocked and I said this from the beginning. Yall can bet that the state will close or dead docket the supposed “investigation(s)” into all Becky Hill related corruption and illegal activities because it’s a clear conflict. How and why there’s already an evidentiary hearing with Justice Toal on the matter of jury tampering when SLED is still supposedly investigating the tampering, wiretapping, and obstruction charges etc etc related to the tampering, is beyond me?!?! Clearly that all goes away if justice Toal rules against Alex at the hearing on the 29th! How can you have Justice Toal say that there’s no evidence of tampering and then SLED continues the investigation and brings criminal charges for tampering later on down the road. Please give me a break. This is all so stupid. Common sense is not so common. The ethics commission and SLED has had since July 2023 or earlier, who really knows at this point, to come to some sort of finding, conclusions, or charges related to all the evidence they have gathered. How long does it take? Absolutely no updates on either investigation have been provided and y’all can bet that they never will after the 29th evidentiary hearing. Shameful. Do better South Carolina.
Badgering jurors post-verdict to overturn their decision should not be easy to litigate. It is only possible here because the defense lawyer is a major SC political figure with apparently unlimited funding. The SC legal system is extremely friendly to special interests. Prosecutors meeting with Hill may look bad and one can be sure it won’t go unnoticed by the defense team. It is among the minor problems the Murdaugh affair has raised.
If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it is a duck. Murdaugh killed them. Paul didn’t see it coming but when Maggie was running towards the gunshots she saw who was going to murder her. It pains me that this woman knew she was doomed at the hands of her husband who was supposed to protect her. Alex wasn’t up on technology and this is what made him guilty. I wish I could spit on him in his cell and plaster pics of Paul and Maggie all over his cell.
It looks like a frame up for the benefits of Eric Bland’s and Mark Tinsley’s clients; it quacks like a frame up of Alex Murdaugh; it is a frame-up for the enrichment of Eric, Mark and Becky and the election to the governorship of Alan Wilson.