|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Nancy Mace Goes On The Offensive
Lowcountry congresswoman drops bombs on South Carolina’s attorney general…
Lowcountry congresswoman drops bombs on South Carolina’s attorney general…
|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
11 comments
I want to see Curtis Loftis in the Governor’s Mansion!
She’s the Republican version James Smith… believing she’s entitled to whatever she wants. Since Alan Wilson and Andre Bauer are now apparently running, she’ll have to show up to the primary debate in a bikini showing her stretch marks and store bought bad boob job. Maybe she’ll talk about how her for now boyfriend bent her over the kitchen counter on her way to the debate.
Nancy Mace is always offensive.
Nancy Mace would be a horrible choice for governor. She is not a true conservative. Also, I am sick of her going bragging about her being the first female graduate of The Citadel. Newsflash, Nancy, they didn’t want Shannon Faulkner there, and they didn’t want you there at the time either. SC needs a small government politician that will actually use their bully pulpit to push out legislators to make meaningful change in this state.
I believe it was none other than Ronald Reagan who said “Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican”. Nancy’s going to throw so many bombs that she’ll have no one to come to her aid when, invariably, they get started throwing them back at her. Along the way, she may damage a candidate who might actually be the right guy (or gal) for the office.
So let me get this straight, you don’t think the public should not be told anything bad about Republicans, but its OK if they are Democrats? How can someone who engages in or refuses to call out people who engage in sex trafficking, sexual assaults, or any crime for that matter ever be the “right person” for the office?
Republicans really are corrupt down to the voter level. There has to be some celestial blowback from that fake Christian persona they love to adopt.
It’s a matter of style – you don’t say “he’s a low down motha @*&@ who would (@** anything in a skirt”. You say “he struggles with fidelity”. Tell the truth when asked.
HOWEVER, you obviously have fallen for the half-truth here. Wilson has been tough on sex trafficking and CSAM. He just won’t do it the way the Mace wants (hence her bomb throwing). Wilson put Russel Stokes, Andrew Reed and Jake Ergle (all white men) under the jail for CSAM just in the last 3-4 months. Mace or Wilson would be okay gubernors. Mace’s problem is her style/temperament – she’s nothing if not pugnacious. Wilson’s problem is one of focus (and maybe a lack of style), while I appreciate his supporting national conservative causes, we’ve got plenty of issues here in SC.
I haven’t fallen for anything. This is a nonissue because Republicans don’t care if their leaders are sex traffickers or sexual predators. And why shouldn’t the language be as vulgar as the leader of the party? You know, you can just walk up and grab em by the P*&&y, because when you are a star they let you do it. But Mace is no better. I don’t remember either Wilson or Mace calling out Matt Gaetz for his sex trafficking or Trump who has been accused by many women of molesting them, who has confessed on tape to doing it, and who has been found by a jury to have committed sexual assault.
This has nothing to do with focus, it has to do with character and morals. Republicans, from the President to their voters, including Wilson and Mace have neither when it comes to these issues. Pretending to care about morality and sex crimes just fits with the Christian persona they think they have cloaked themselves in.
Sorry, I thought you were interested in a real debate rather than pontificating…
Nancy Mace’s massive cross earrings are a pathetic attempt to get in with the conservative voters in the Upstate. Wearing gigantic Christian symbols does not make you a Christian.
If a candidate were truly the best choice for the position they seek, they would concentrate on highlighting their accomplishments and outlining their plans if elected, rather than dwelling on their opponent’s shortcomings, which essentially frames the decision as choosing the lesser of two evils.