“I did deliver a fridge,” Crosby told Wood. “And it’s funny because her and I talked about Domino’s Pizza, because she knew that the court had just had Domino’s Pizza, because I don’t know if she delivered them or (if) she was there. She was talking about how much the court just paid for the pizza, and that was kind of the extent of our conversation, other than, you know, we both had different jobs now.”
Why would Myra’s tenant even bring that up to her? What would she even have any reason to be telling Myra anything about pizza being delivered to the courthouse? And what Myra says afterwards is pretty enlightening..She says “so she felt a necessary to send an email because I had an opinion” That right there tells me she did in fact talk to her tenants about the trial. Ridiculous!
I think that Ms. Crosby has “selective” memory. I wasn’t impressed with her in the interview with Jenn. I have never stopped listening to Jenn’s interviews until this one. I couldn’t take listening to Ms. Crosby. I didn’t find her believable.
Retrial or not, Murdaugh’s still guilty. There’s Paul’s timestamped Snapchat video that places him at the crime scene, the cell tower pings from his cellphone, the telemetry from the OnStar data in his Chevy Suburban.
PMPED’s CFO uncovered Murdaugh’s embezzlement. The wrongful death lawsuit of Mallory Beach would show that Murdaugh’s wealth was really a house of cards. The confrontation with the CFO pushed Murdaugh over the edge.
Why is this so hard for ppl to figure out? It’s really not that hard..Are you guys going to interview Mandy? The email from Avery and the email Echols answer the questions!!
First, how would Valerie Bauerlein know that Mark Tinsley “tossed and turned” “in the nights leading up to Murdaugh’s testimony” unless Valerie was lying (grammatically incorrect people would write “laying” but you “lie in bed” in the present tense and “lay in bed” in the past tense) in bed next to Mark Tinsley throughout those “nights”?
Second, why is no one autre que moi bothered by the self-admitted, nay self-bragged, violations of a cardinal rule of legal ethics: a lawyer involves in civil litigation should not participate in criminal proceedings that could give that lawyer advantage in the civil litigation? Yet, Mark Tinsley and Ever-Bluffing Eric Bland (“EBEB”) are falling over themselves and each other to claim credit for Richard Alexander Murdaugh’s (“RAM”) two-murder convictions. EBEB and Tinsley PUBLICLY brag about having “strategized with the Prosecution” for two hours every morning of RAM’s trial and “passing notes prodding [the Prosecution] about points,” respectively.
Third, about those guns: No one other than EBEB and Tinsley ever suggested IN THE TRIAL that the real killers went to the scene looking for guns. In my opinion free from false humility, the real killers went equipped with Paul’s stolen guns. Think of it! The $4K gun Paul received for Christmas 2016 and was stolen from him at a Halloween party in 2017 could not have dissolved into thin air but was most likely retained or sold by the thief. In a small community like that, people do not talk to incriminate themselves. They only talk to falsely incriminate others and let the rumors take a life of their own as they did to Buster in relationship to Stephen Smith’s death (by suicide in my opinion free from false humility) which was, God forbade, almost pinned on the hapless Buster.
Again, everybody please remember Jesus Christ’s saying that the love of money is the root of all evils.
Perhaps the same hand who composed the email for CN Avery was the same who stuffed “thousands of dollars” in another juror’s pocket.
As concerning as Myra Crosby’s improper removal from the jury, if not more concerning, is the retention on the jury of the man who, according to Becky Hill’s own book, received “thousands of dollars” to stay on the jury instead returning to work to earn his keep and pay “his baby mama” the child support on which he was in arrears and at risk of contempt of court.
Becky Hill wrote that juror disclosed that to her on their expense-paid luxury flight to New York the day after the guilty verdict.
When will anyone seriously look into that and tell us where those “thousands of dollars” came from AND why?
I’ve been writing about that since I read it a year ago in Becky Hill’s book; but it is as if I were talking to a wall or walls.
Mais j’accuse! Oui, j’accuse.
Thank God, I just posted (and FITS let through) comments elsewhere on the history of David Fernandez. They are too long to repost here; but please look for them under “Who Targeted [the egg juror].”
Below is how my most recent series of comments ends.
Further evidence against then-CACA-Fernandez:
On 3 March 2010, only two business days after I had, thank God and WITHOUT A LAWYER, defeated Hatchet-for-Hire Heather’s evil plan to get me convicted for harassment and sentenced to 46 years, yes forty-six because of weird statutory enhancements, I appeared before then-Columbia-Municipal-Judge, now-Federal-Appeals-Judge DeAndrea Benjamin, demanding dismissal of the other false charges CACA-Fernandez and Hatchet-for-Hire Heather had concocted against me (in case that harassment thing failed as, thank God, it did). Jurist Benjamin ORDERED then-CACA-Fernandez to give me discovery in 30 days.
After 30 days and no word from then-CACA-Fernandez, I wrote to Fernandez. He responded that no hearing had taken place except in my hallucinations. When I emailed him the written transcript of that hearing, he filed for an order to prevent me from communicating with him or be held in contempt of court.
This is THE David Fernandez presented aa a genius prosecutor.
He could get his way with one as rich as Richard Alexander Murdaugh (“RAM”) or someone as smart and innocent and, in Judge Clifton Newman’s TRANSCRIBED words “most pleasant and gracious” as Dr. Marie Faltas.
Every one should care, if not for RAM or for Dr. Faltas, but for themselves who may, God forbid, find their own FIGURATIVE necks under Heather’s hatchet with David Fernandez foot on the victim’s shoulder.
Every one should care because Jesus Christ said, “I was a prisoner and you did not visit me.”
Correction: My lengthier comments about David Fernandez (supported as usual by quotations from OFFICIAL court transcripts) are under the thread of “The State’s Bizarre [pretext for keeping the records sealed].”
And for the interested readers’ convenience, here is a copy of my latest post on “The State’s Bizarre [pretext for keeping the records sealed]”:
Now, again God willing and FITS permitting, and NOT in defense of Becky Hill, I want to show that South Carolina’s criminal [so-called] “justice” system is set up to make the things Becky Hill and David Fernandez did to Richard Alexander Murdaugh (“RAM”) and to Myra Catherine Crosby (“MCC”); and the things Hatchet-for-Hire Heather and David Fernandez and Marion Oneida Hanna, among others, possible. The system not only enables robes gone rogue and prosecutors gone pits; it rewards them.
I previously documented two different assistant-solicitors who texted sitting jurors.
So, Marion Oneida Hanna is apparently a bastard in the Black’s Law Dictionary LEGAL definition of the word. Mr. Hanna’s obituary refers to Marion’s mother as the surviving “mother of his children,” not his wife or ex-wife. And that diminutive woman who birthed Marion also birthed out of wedlock with a man different from Marion’s biological father a hulk of a son who was apparently adopted, de-adopted, then re-adopted.
That known “bastard” in the LEGAL dictionary meaning, grew up have the screen name of “Bo Hopkins” and acquire some fame as Matthew Blasdell in the 1980s “Dynasty.”
The ever-jealous Marion fancied herself an actress, too, and filled her City of Columbia courtroom with florid theatrics.
Marion also fancied herself a beauty queen, a psychiatrist, an interior decorator, a painter, a charmer, AND an author.
On City time, Marion wrote, shopped, then self-published two books with essentially the same basic plot. The incomparable Marion-inspired heroine has super powers and ends up with a puppy-dog husband whom the heroine hates, outwits, and at the end either subjugates or kills.
The first book is “You Can’t Get There From Here,” which has a plot taken almost verbatim from the now-century-old suspicion/story that the Founding Murdaugh intentionally parked his car across the railroad in the path of an oncoming train to make it look like the train’s fault and sue the company for a huge settlement. In Marion’s version, her grandfather committed suicide that way because he had raped and impregnated the Marion-inspired figure and she almost died after obtaining an illegal abortion before which the Ob-Gyn raped the Marion-inspired figure, too, because it was a free one.
Adding to the shlock, the Marion-inspired figure’s brother is South Carolina’s or Georgia’s Clark Gable and Arnold Scharzenegger rolled into one. As a teenager, he rescues a whole bus full of students, gets rewarded with a scholarship to The Citadel in which he accumulates embarrassing stories about his colleagues; and, when the time comes to run for judge, he uses those stories to push out his rivals.
Rumors and jokes have it that Marion Oneida Hanna got appointed Columbia Municipal Judge because she “had pictures on somebody.” She certainly had not talent or merit for such, or any, public position of trust.
And the third element is a rival lady (in the first novel, the Marion-inspired figure’s grandmother; in real life, Marion’s mother-in-law) who ends up locked up in an insane asylum.
In the second novel, The Road to Mendocino, the Marion-inspired heroine’s rival is a beautiful young lawyer, daughter of a judge and law clerk to another judge, who also ends locked up in an insane asylum after being shot in the hand by the Marion-inspired heroine.
The plagiarism of Marion Oneida Hanna’s second novel is from Truman Capote’s “Unanswered Prayers” which consists of three novellas, in one of which a beautiful but poor wife is surreptitiously given abortifacient herbs by an insanely jealous rich husband who thinks the pregnancy’s father is a black or Arab man.
So, basically, talentless women without integrity climb the public employment ladder with a mix of sugariness some time, acquiring powerful people’s secrets other times, and outright violence as a final solution. When almost caught, that opportunist finds a despised person and beats up on him/her.
The opportunist’s name may be Rebecca Marie Hill or Marion Oneida Hanna or David Amadeo Fernandez, or any one else involved in framing RAM or trying to frame Dr. Marie Faltas. But the system needs a more thorough look NOW than it ever had before because it is no longer sustainable.
Who let the dogs out? Who rides the horses? And who created Hurricane Helene and made it hit Appalachian North Carolina?
According to Andy Fancher, it might be the deep state. If so, here is my response to him just in case Google censors it:
I had missed the beginning of this live. Does Andy Fancher SERIOUSLY suggest the U.S. Government diverted Hurricane Helene towards a lithium-mining town in Appalachian North Carolina to punish some residents for resisting lithium mining?
I hope I get a straight answer to this question; and until I do, I will NOT comment on Andy, whom I had grown to respect.
I will, though, site one example of “stinking thinking” which keeps popping up every time more evidence of Becky Hill’s tampering with the Murdaugh jury is revealed.
The stinking thinking has it that Becky Hill was paid off by the Murdaughs to tamper with the jury so that Alex can get a new trial after the guilty verdict.
I don’t know that I can single-handedly stop the renewed waves of stinking thinking; but I hope there is truth to the hope that mightier than armies is an idea whose time has come.
And here is my mighty answer: If Becky was paid off BY ALEX to tamper with his jury, why would she not have directed the jury towards a not-guilty verdict and been done with it?
So, Andy Fancher, my dear REASONABLE Andy Fancher, would the money and power needed to (create and?) divert a whole Hurricane Helene towards a tiny mountain town not been more than enough to pay off the residents of that town to abandon it to the lithium mining company or whatever entity wanted that town?
Really, Andy. Either you take your investigative work seriously OR all you did so far was to build enough credibility to sell this story of a government-manufactured hurricane, a Category-4 at that. Cloud-seeding, yes. That has been known and established. But to manufacture a hurricane is to LITERALLY insist that moles can build mountains if they can build mole hills.
Please see recent comments of mine related to judicial elections but posted under “The State’s Bizarre [pretext for keeping the egg juror’s records sealed].”
After all, it’s all related to judicial transparency, it is not?
And it’s all related to stinking-thinking prevention. So here is my reply to a commenter on Jen Wood’s interview with one of Brandon Barnes’ baby mamas:
@cls6055, first, I am NOT a “dude.” I am a female DOCTOR. So, please address me as such.
Second, while your comment entirely misses my point, it paradoxically confirms it.
Former African American Republican Congressman and retired football player Watts (if I am remembering the name correctly) said his grandmother had wisely advised him, “You can’t get into a bar fight if you don’t go to a bar.”
You can’t meet a narcissist manipulator on-line if you don’t go on-line looking for relationships in the first place.
And even if you do, and get one pregnancy by that on-line manipulator, why did you go back for a second pregnancy and a second child?
My answer is, again, because you accepted THE CULTURE that you will be laughed at unless there is a man in your life/in your bed.
I recently had the courage and self-respect to unfriend people I had known and cherished since the beginning of medical school 50 years ago.
I did that with pain and pride, not only because I discovered they were obstinately against normalization, but because I discovered (after those 50 years) that they had never even noticed my absolute pacificism. I still have anti-normalization friends; BUT they are open to my pacificist pro-normalization views.
Someone who has no use for you unless you do EXACTLY what they want is someone you should not return to UNLESS you change them.
What happens now to the innocent children who will grow up being told that their father is a monster and their mother is/was an idiot to bring them to the world in the first place?
Thinks about that instead of focusing on insulting me.
God bless nonetheless.
15 comments
I hope he gets another trial outside of Hampton County.
Any leads on the “real killers”?
“I did deliver a fridge,” Crosby told Wood. “And it’s funny because her and I talked about Domino’s Pizza, because she knew that the court had just had Domino’s Pizza, because I don’t know if she delivered them or (if) she was there. She was talking about how much the court just paid for the pizza, and that was kind of the extent of our conversation, other than, you know, we both had different jobs now.”
Why would Myra’s tenant even bring that up to her? What would she even have any reason to be telling Myra anything about pizza being delivered to the courthouse? And what Myra says afterwards is pretty enlightening..She says “so she felt a necessary to send an email because I had an opinion” That right there tells me she did in fact talk to her tenants about the trial. Ridiculous!
It’s amazing what “memories” will come up after the events are all over and it looks like opinion is swaying this way or that…
I think that Ms. Crosby has “selective” memory. I wasn’t impressed with her in the interview with Jenn. I have never stopped listening to Jenn’s interviews until this one. I couldn’t take listening to Ms. Crosby. I didn’t find her believable.
Retrial or not, Murdaugh’s still guilty. There’s Paul’s timestamped Snapchat video that places him at the crime scene, the cell tower pings from his cellphone, the telemetry from the OnStar data in his Chevy Suburban.
PMPED’s CFO uncovered Murdaugh’s embezzlement. The wrongful death lawsuit of Mallory Beach would show that Murdaugh’s wealth was really a house of cards. The confrontation with the CFO pushed Murdaugh over the edge.
Why is this so hard for ppl to figure out? It’s really not that hard..Are you guys going to interview Mandy? The email from Avery and the email Echols answer the questions!!
First, how would Valerie Bauerlein know that Mark Tinsley “tossed and turned” “in the nights leading up to Murdaugh’s testimony” unless Valerie was lying (grammatically incorrect people would write “laying” but you “lie in bed” in the present tense and “lay in bed” in the past tense) in bed next to Mark Tinsley throughout those “nights”?
Second, why is no one autre que moi bothered by the self-admitted, nay self-bragged, violations of a cardinal rule of legal ethics: a lawyer involves in civil litigation should not participate in criminal proceedings that could give that lawyer advantage in the civil litigation? Yet, Mark Tinsley and Ever-Bluffing Eric Bland (“EBEB”) are falling over themselves and each other to claim credit for Richard Alexander Murdaugh’s (“RAM”) two-murder convictions. EBEB and Tinsley PUBLICLY brag about having “strategized with the Prosecution” for two hours every morning of RAM’s trial and “passing notes prodding [the Prosecution] about points,” respectively.
Third, about those guns: No one other than EBEB and Tinsley ever suggested IN THE TRIAL that the real killers went to the scene looking for guns. In my opinion free from false humility, the real killers went equipped with Paul’s stolen guns. Think of it! The $4K gun Paul received for Christmas 2016 and was stolen from him at a Halloween party in 2017 could not have dissolved into thin air but was most likely retained or sold by the thief. In a small community like that, people do not talk to incriminate themselves. They only talk to falsely incriminate others and let the rumors take a life of their own as they did to Buster in relationship to Stephen Smith’s death (by suicide in my opinion free from false humility) which was, God forbade, almost pinned on the hapless Buster.
Again, everybody please remember Jesus Christ’s saying that the love of money is the root of all evils.
Perhaps the same hand who composed the email for CN Avery was the same who stuffed “thousands of dollars” in another juror’s pocket.
As concerning as Myra Crosby’s improper removal from the jury, if not more concerning, is the retention on the jury of the man who, according to Becky Hill’s own book, received “thousands of dollars” to stay on the jury instead returning to work to earn his keep and pay “his baby mama” the child support on which he was in arrears and at risk of contempt of court.
Becky Hill wrote that juror disclosed that to her on their expense-paid luxury flight to New York the day after the guilty verdict.
When will anyone seriously look into that and tell us where those “thousands of dollars” came from AND why?
I’ve been writing about that since I read it a year ago in Becky Hill’s book; but it is as if I were talking to a wall or walls.
Mais j’accuse! Oui, j’accuse.
Thank God, I just posted (and FITS let through) comments elsewhere on the history of David Fernandez. They are too long to repost here; but please look for them under “Who Targeted [the egg juror].”
Below is how my most recent series of comments ends.
Further evidence against then-CACA-Fernandez:
On 3 March 2010, only two business days after I had, thank God and WITHOUT A LAWYER, defeated Hatchet-for-Hire Heather’s evil plan to get me convicted for harassment and sentenced to 46 years, yes forty-six because of weird statutory enhancements, I appeared before then-Columbia-Municipal-Judge, now-Federal-Appeals-Judge DeAndrea Benjamin, demanding dismissal of the other false charges CACA-Fernandez and Hatchet-for-Hire Heather had concocted against me (in case that harassment thing failed as, thank God, it did). Jurist Benjamin ORDERED then-CACA-Fernandez to give me discovery in 30 days.
After 30 days and no word from then-CACA-Fernandez, I wrote to Fernandez. He responded that no hearing had taken place except in my hallucinations. When I emailed him the written transcript of that hearing, he filed for an order to prevent me from communicating with him or be held in contempt of court.
This is THE David Fernandez presented aa a genius prosecutor.
He could get his way with one as rich as Richard Alexander Murdaugh (“RAM”) or someone as smart and innocent and, in Judge Clifton Newman’s TRANSCRIBED words “most pleasant and gracious” as Dr. Marie Faltas.
Every one should care, if not for RAM or for Dr. Faltas, but for themselves who may, God forbid, find their own FIGURATIVE necks under Heather’s hatchet with David Fernandez foot on the victim’s shoulder.
Every one should care because Jesus Christ said, “I was a prisoner and you did not visit me.”
Correction: My lengthier comments about David Fernandez (supported as usual by quotations from OFFICIAL court transcripts) are under the thread of “The State’s Bizarre [pretext for keeping the records sealed].”
And for the interested readers’ convenience, here is a copy of my latest post on “The State’s Bizarre [pretext for keeping the records sealed]”:
Now, again God willing and FITS permitting, and NOT in defense of Becky Hill, I want to show that South Carolina’s criminal [so-called] “justice” system is set up to make the things Becky Hill and David Fernandez did to Richard Alexander Murdaugh (“RAM”) and to Myra Catherine Crosby (“MCC”); and the things Hatchet-for-Hire Heather and David Fernandez and Marion Oneida Hanna, among others, possible. The system not only enables robes gone rogue and prosecutors gone pits; it rewards them.
I previously documented two different assistant-solicitors who texted sitting jurors.
So, Marion Oneida Hanna is apparently a bastard in the Black’s Law Dictionary LEGAL definition of the word. Mr. Hanna’s obituary refers to Marion’s mother as the surviving “mother of his children,” not his wife or ex-wife. And that diminutive woman who birthed Marion also birthed out of wedlock with a man different from Marion’s biological father a hulk of a son who was apparently adopted, de-adopted, then re-adopted.
That known “bastard” in the LEGAL dictionary meaning, grew up have the screen name of “Bo Hopkins” and acquire some fame as Matthew Blasdell in the 1980s “Dynasty.”
The ever-jealous Marion fancied herself an actress, too, and filled her City of Columbia courtroom with florid theatrics.
Marion also fancied herself a beauty queen, a psychiatrist, an interior decorator, a painter, a charmer, AND an author.
On City time, Marion wrote, shopped, then self-published two books with essentially the same basic plot. The incomparable Marion-inspired heroine has super powers and ends up with a puppy-dog husband whom the heroine hates, outwits, and at the end either subjugates or kills.
The first book is “You Can’t Get There From Here,” which has a plot taken almost verbatim from the now-century-old suspicion/story that the Founding Murdaugh intentionally parked his car across the railroad in the path of an oncoming train to make it look like the train’s fault and sue the company for a huge settlement. In Marion’s version, her grandfather committed suicide that way because he had raped and impregnated the Marion-inspired figure and she almost died after obtaining an illegal abortion before which the Ob-Gyn raped the Marion-inspired figure, too, because it was a free one.
Adding to the shlock, the Marion-inspired figure’s brother is South Carolina’s or Georgia’s Clark Gable and Arnold Scharzenegger rolled into one. As a teenager, he rescues a whole bus full of students, gets rewarded with a scholarship to The Citadel in which he accumulates embarrassing stories about his colleagues; and, when the time comes to run for judge, he uses those stories to push out his rivals.
Rumors and jokes have it that Marion Oneida Hanna got appointed Columbia Municipal Judge because she “had pictures on somebody.” She certainly had not talent or merit for such, or any, public position of trust.
And the third element is a rival lady (in the first novel, the Marion-inspired figure’s grandmother; in real life, Marion’s mother-in-law) who ends up locked up in an insane asylum.
In the second novel, The Road to Mendocino, the Marion-inspired heroine’s rival is a beautiful young lawyer, daughter of a judge and law clerk to another judge, who also ends locked up in an insane asylum after being shot in the hand by the Marion-inspired heroine.
The plagiarism of Marion Oneida Hanna’s second novel is from Truman Capote’s “Unanswered Prayers” which consists of three novellas, in one of which a beautiful but poor wife is surreptitiously given abortifacient herbs by an insanely jealous rich husband who thinks the pregnancy’s father is a black or Arab man.
So, basically, talentless women without integrity climb the public employment ladder with a mix of sugariness some time, acquiring powerful people’s secrets other times, and outright violence as a final solution. When almost caught, that opportunist finds a despised person and beats up on him/her.
The opportunist’s name may be Rebecca Marie Hill or Marion Oneida Hanna or David Amadeo Fernandez, or any one else involved in framing RAM or trying to frame Dr. Marie Faltas. But the system needs a more thorough look NOW than it ever had before because it is no longer sustainable.
Who let the dogs out? Who rides the horses? And who created Hurricane Helene and made it hit Appalachian North Carolina?
According to Andy Fancher, it might be the deep state. If so, here is my response to him just in case Google censors it:
I had missed the beginning of this live. Does Andy Fancher SERIOUSLY suggest the U.S. Government diverted Hurricane Helene towards a lithium-mining town in Appalachian North Carolina to punish some residents for resisting lithium mining?
I hope I get a straight answer to this question; and until I do, I will NOT comment on Andy, whom I had grown to respect.
I will, though, site one example of “stinking thinking” which keeps popping up every time more evidence of Becky Hill’s tampering with the Murdaugh jury is revealed.
The stinking thinking has it that Becky Hill was paid off by the Murdaughs to tamper with the jury so that Alex can get a new trial after the guilty verdict.
I don’t know that I can single-handedly stop the renewed waves of stinking thinking; but I hope there is truth to the hope that mightier than armies is an idea whose time has come.
And here is my mighty answer: If Becky was paid off BY ALEX to tamper with his jury, why would she not have directed the jury towards a not-guilty verdict and been done with it?
So, Andy Fancher, my dear REASONABLE Andy Fancher, would the money and power needed to (create and?) divert a whole Hurricane Helene towards a tiny mountain town not been more than enough to pay off the residents of that town to abandon it to the lithium mining company or whatever entity wanted that town?
Really, Andy. Either you take your investigative work seriously OR all you did so far was to build enough credibility to sell this story of a government-manufactured hurricane, a Category-4 at that. Cloud-seeding, yes. That has been known and established. But to manufacture a hurricane is to LITERALLY insist that moles can build mountains if they can build mole hills.
Please see recent comments of mine related to judicial elections but posted under “The State’s Bizarre [pretext for keeping the egg juror’s records sealed].”
After all, it’s all related to judicial transparency, it is not?
And it’s all related to stinking-thinking prevention. So here is my reply to a commenter on Jen Wood’s interview with one of Brandon Barnes’ baby mamas:
@cls6055, first, I am NOT a “dude.” I am a female DOCTOR. So, please address me as such.
Second, while your comment entirely misses my point, it paradoxically confirms it.
Former African American Republican Congressman and retired football player Watts (if I am remembering the name correctly) said his grandmother had wisely advised him, “You can’t get into a bar fight if you don’t go to a bar.”
You can’t meet a narcissist manipulator on-line if you don’t go on-line looking for relationships in the first place.
And even if you do, and get one pregnancy by that on-line manipulator, why did you go back for a second pregnancy and a second child?
My answer is, again, because you accepted THE CULTURE that you will be laughed at unless there is a man in your life/in your bed.
I recently had the courage and self-respect to unfriend people I had known and cherished since the beginning of medical school 50 years ago.
I did that with pain and pride, not only because I discovered they were obstinately against normalization, but because I discovered (after those 50 years) that they had never even noticed my absolute pacificism. I still have anti-normalization friends; BUT they are open to my pacificist pro-normalization views.
Someone who has no use for you unless you do EXACTLY what they want is someone you should not return to UNLESS you change them.
What happens now to the innocent children who will grow up being told that their father is a monster and their mother is/was an idiot to bring them to the world in the first place?
Thinks about that instead of focusing on insulting me.
God bless nonetheless.