Image default
State House

South Carolina Abortion Debate: What’s Next?

Republican base wants tougher limits, GOP leaders express “fatigue.”

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Last week’s South Carolina supreme court decision upholding the state legislature’s six-
You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Related posts

State House

SEC Probing South Carolina’s Finances

Will Folks
State House

South Carolina Supreme Court Vacancy: Candidate List Released

Will Folks
State House

South Carolina’s $1.8 Billion Surplus: More Misdirection

Will Folks

5 comments

Here comes your future August 30, 2023 at 5:07 pm

What’s next?

More educated and competent professionals will continue to leave the State, while it slides deeper into third-world status.

Combined with anti-immigration policies and it’ll be even worse. At some point, the Federal government and economically successful States will have to put their foot down on Federal dollars keeping SC afloat.

Reply
Basic History August 30, 2023 at 8:31 pm

lol

The funny thing is none of these abortion bans or whatever have done anything to lower the rates of abortion across the country.

The rate of doctors leaving the Stare and medical students going elsewhere will multiply.

Luckily, manufacturing is returning to North America, so we’ll need cheap labor to make the little stuff we were getting from China…the Southeast can return to being the source of low-educated, low cost laborers the corporations can exploit. Just like Republican policies are working towards.

Reply
Pro Birth Party August 30, 2023 at 10:30 pm

What’s next is Republicans target birth control.

Reply
Curious Jane August 31, 2023 at 4:28 pm

The entire argument was lost when it was framed as “ban”, “abortion”, “privacy”. The ONLY REAL issue is life. If Republicans keep allowing the discussion to be reframed, they entirely miss the point. The Constitution must uphold life.

Who receives an abortion? A pregnant woman. In that regard, what is pregnancy? Carrying a human life. What is “terminating life”?
Murder.
No matter what else is injected into the conversation, it comes down to convenience.
Murder for convenience.
So now any discussion about such murder is only a matter of justifying why one person’s convenience should ever outweigh another person’s INHERENT right to life, as guaranteed by our Constitution. Such life shall not be deprived without due process.
Abortion violates that child’s rights.

Reply
Brain Damage leads to conservative views August 31, 2023 at 5:26 pm

We’re you born with brain damage or did you suffer a head injury later in life?

Reply

Leave a Comment