Image default
TRUE CRIME

Alex Murdaugh’s Alleged Accomplice Charged Federally

Cory Fleming set to plead guilty …

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
One of convicted killer Alex Murdaugh’s alleged accomplices in his schemes to steal millions of do
You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Related posts

TRUE CRIME

Hidden Texts, Secret Numbers: Digging Deeper Into Unreleased Murdaugh Files

Jenn Wood
TRUE CRIME

Mica Miller Saga: Investigation Into Second Suspicious Death Ongoing

Callie Lyons
TRUE CRIME

Murdaugh Appeal: Prosecutors Say Evidence ‘Overwhelming,’ Misconduct Claims Overblown

Jenn Wood

2 comments

Ralph Hightower Top fan May 24, 2023 at 4:09 pm

Murdaugh is taking down about as many people in the FBI sting operation “Lost Trust”.

Reply
stephen henry Top fan May 25, 2023 at 12:18 pm

I would still like to know if SLED is still investigating Gloria Satterfield’s death, specifically the actual CAUSE of her “fall”. Alex’s ONLY alibi for not being directly involved is that he had left Moselle that morning and was “at work”. Then he claimed to have returned to Moselle after hearing about Gloria’s “fall”. This “alibi” and timeline is flagrantly suspect, to say the very least. Further, it is almost a precise conceptual “clone” of his alibi for not being at Moselle when Maggie and Paul were murdered three years later. I personally believe if Alex was not at work that morning, he should be a major “person of interest” in Gloria’s “fall” and subsequent death. To put it another way, he may very well have gotten away with murder, at least so far.

If SLED has not obtained his GPS data and phone records for that morning, then the investigation is either closed or the investigators have lost interest in the case and it has fallen through the cracks. Further, if employees at Alex’s law firm were not questioned about his presence at work that morning, that would indicate further mis-handling or total disinterest on the part of law enforcement.

PS … A common argument that Alex was not responsible for her fall is that “he would not have left her alive if he had been responsible, and if he had left her alive, she would have named him as her assailant after recovering consciousness.” Two points which I feel are pertinent in response to that argument: (1) He may have not intended to kill her, just injure her to the point he could have initiated a claim on her behalf that he could later steal; and (2) VERY RELEVANT. There is NO POSSIBLE WAY Gloria would have ever disputed Alex’s word about what had happened to her. NO POSSIBLE WAY.

Anyone who is not interested in what actually happened to Gloria that morning is not in the least bit interested in justice. It is NOT a good argument that the Satterfield family has received a lot of cash from individuals and institutions.

Reply

Leave a Comment