All it took was the retirement of that idiot chief justice Beatty and Few and James worried they won’t get re-elected for the court to rule properly. Now let’s get school choice back to the court for a correct ruling
What are you saying here? That the ruling was incorrect and only came out this way because of political reasons? That is a serious accusation to level – do you have any facts to back it up?
And before you fire back with a personal attack at me (easy to do because I comment under my real name) – I am not being sarcastic. I really want to know your proof of Beatty being an “idiot” and Few and James having some political concern in reaching this ruling. Obviously you agree the ruling is wrong (even if you agree with it), I am just curious where you got your insight on how it was reached.
Members of the “Freedom Caucus” should keep their peckers in their pants and then there would be no need for anyone who wants an abortion to be worried about a group of non-medical wannabe mini-trumps and pseudo religious zealots deciding that they can’t have one. Maybe next year this same group of clowns will pass some legislation that will provide for—and protect—the children that are alive now.
Don’t give me the crap that we live in a republic and not a democracy where “the people’s voice is spoken by their elected representatives”. If any of them had any cajones, they would place the issue on a referendum and let the voice of the people be heard.
We live in a Democratic Republic, and the voices of the people WERE heard, and our representatives are responsible for the laws and make-up of the Court we voted for. Your Pro-Death coalition blew it when you went from Safe, Legal, and Rare to using abortion as a method of birth control.
4 comments
All it took was the retirement of that idiot chief justice Beatty and Few and James worried they won’t get re-elected for the court to rule properly. Now let’s get school choice back to the court for a correct ruling
What are you saying here? That the ruling was incorrect and only came out this way because of political reasons? That is a serious accusation to level – do you have any facts to back it up?
And before you fire back with a personal attack at me (easy to do because I comment under my real name) – I am not being sarcastic. I really want to know your proof of Beatty being an “idiot” and Few and James having some political concern in reaching this ruling. Obviously you agree the ruling is wrong (even if you agree with it), I am just curious where you got your insight on how it was reached.
Members of the “Freedom Caucus” should keep their peckers in their pants and then there would be no need for anyone who wants an abortion to be worried about a group of non-medical wannabe mini-trumps and pseudo religious zealots deciding that they can’t have one. Maybe next year this same group of clowns will pass some legislation that will provide for—and protect—the children that are alive now.
Don’t give me the crap that we live in a republic and not a democracy where “the people’s voice is spoken by their elected representatives”. If any of them had any cajones, they would place the issue on a referendum and let the voice of the people be heard.
We live in a Democratic Republic, and the voices of the people WERE heard, and our representatives are responsible for the laws and make-up of the Court we voted for. Your Pro-Death coalition blew it when you went from Safe, Legal, and Rare to using abortion as a method of birth control.