|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Controversial ‘Republican’ Rules Change Prompts Altercation On S.C. House Floor
“I (told) him to keep my name out of his mouth or we would have a serious problem…”
9 comments
Guffey? lose his temper? LMAO. He’s gonna pull that on the wrong one some day…..
Yep! I hope the voters in Rock Hill and related areas have the good sense to show Guffey back to the life of a private citizen at their next opportunity. I think his personal problems are seriously overriding whatever good judgment he may or may not have had.
I see Ms. Messyhair hasn’t changed her hairdo, still has that 3 year old who just woke from a nap look. Not many 60 year old woman can pull that off successfully.
Are you talking about Berenstain?
Mr. Folks you make reference the Freedom Caucus gained seats. Last session, it appears they had 17 members -including Rep. May who is under federal investigation. Now that Rep. May is conveniently no longer a member and upstate voters refused to send a Freedom Caucus member to Washington and a former Freedom Caucus member joined the House Republican Caucus. I know they told the media they expected to seat 25 members during the June ‘24 primary.
If you check the Freedom Caucus network -which list their S.C. members, there’s just a few listed.
Apparently it’s difficult to find them, but would encourage you to double check your Freedom Caucus count.
Wow. You guys are complete liars and bring his son into your lies to get clicks. Do you really think if it happened real new sources would have picked it up. I hope you meet karma
The whole damn lot of them need to be replaced. No wonder our state is in the bottom of almost everything
Let’s get rid of all the corruption in S.C.
While I am in favor of all measurers that allow the public to know how their representative voted on anything in Committee or before the whole body, after reading H. 3815, I can’t discern what portion of it prevents members from pulling bills from committees to the floor to force votes on them. Maybe you can amend this article to point that part out to us Will? Perhaps get a disinterested lawyer who understands legislative bylaws to opine on this? Politicians claim certain bills will or won’t do certain things all the time, and sometimes it sounds like opposing sides are talking about completely different bills.
So basically a guy stood up for himself and told a wiesel to shut his mouth. Wiesel gets offended and claims the other guy had to be held back. And this is news? Not sure what that says about the future of our country when that’s what makes a headline. Got any actual news?