Lazenby: SC Personhood Bills Stopped In Subcommittee
BILLS WERE “AN ATTACK ON WOMEN’S HEALTH AND LIBERTY” By Amy Lazenby || This week, You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
BILLS WERE “AN ATTACK ON WOMEN’S HEALTH AND LIBERTY” By Amy Lazenby || This week, You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
23 comments
What does the law say in GA, your state of residence?
Best not be in Georgia, Bo!
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YQ8d4VN1MlE
Will, you can represent SC. Lazenby can represent GA.
All you need now is to find representatives of the other 48 states and you will have the entire country covered.
But then you will have to find people to come online and read all of the out of state rhetoric and pretend they care about what they have to say.
There is no war on women’s rights.
Nope, none at all.
A voice of reason at FitsNews. Props to Will for not quashing a view opposite his.
I was active defending reproductive freedom from 1970 to 2004 in Kentucky. Nice to see the younger generation keeping up the fight.
Is the blood still on your hands 10 years later…???…were you one of those hippies who’d rape girls after giving them drugs…
Also: Your oldest murder victim would be 44 if you would not have killed her…I bet you’re real proud that your record of snuffing out life, in the name of liberal decadence…is so long…
PS: I would not be so sure FITS opposes you on this…he hates ever defender of life in public office…while he “likes” all the greedy abortionists…
Is the blood still on your hands 10 years later
——-
Make sure you wash that white shit off your hands… I’d hate to think that would still be there after 10 years!
Congrats…The murderous Dr. Gosnell, and Satan, are standing and cheering, praying more babies can be killed, and more women snuffed-out on the suction table..
I prayed the greedy abortionists, and democrat politicians, would lose this…
You may have convinced yourself that this is a woman’s right, but it’s actually a way for men to use a woman, then send her to the slaughter house, to erase his “problem” so she can come back and be his stupid little toy…no responsibility attached…
Any mother, who can afford her children, should be ashamed for advocating poor women’s children are not worth the life God gave them….
A fish with human dna is God almighty to you, but the born poor who need health care are worth less than actual fish to you.
What’s next, SC…premeditated murder for jerking it?
Ya beat me to it John Boy, pun not intended. Reading this article, I was wondering how long before the anti-masturbationists would put forth a bill granting personhood to all those little white tadpoles that don’t quite make it to and through the big egg.
How many of us could wind up in prison, convicted of mass murder for choking the old chicken or blowing a load into a woman who had been the recipient of a tubal ligation or hysterectomy, not to mention a chick who does anal or gives good head?
Seriously, I am in agreement with Amy on this one.
If only we could return, by stages, to the good old days of the Inquisition… That lasted for 400 years the first time, maybe we could beat the record.
I couldn’t help but LOL at comments by Senator Bright on this topic. He was calculating the number of abortions performed as “taxpayers” and Social Security “contributors” or some such. More likely, a child “raised” by a parent(s) who did not want it to begin with, would not receive the love, guidance, and support that any child deserves. They would therefore likely wind up a career criminal, incarcerated in jails, mental institutions, or worse, for most of their lives and claiming victims of various sorts between stays in those institutions.
Hass anyone published a list who is contributing to the war chests of these greedy pro-abortionists????…
That’s common procedure for the democrat Hate squads…
Abortion is a smokescreen for the Republican support of the rich. They throw you a stinking fish, and you accept it as “anti-abortion, pro-life”
Perhaps too much optimism from Amy.
http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/2014/03/13/4092223/sc-bill-that-could-close-abortion.html
No optimism at all, actually. This piece was specific to the two personhood bills. I’m following the admitting privileges tactic, as well as the 19/20 week ban (both of which have met with more success nationwide than personhood), and they are a topic for another piece. Thank you for reading and commenting.
I’m waiting for legislation that declares an interrupted IPO an abortion rights issue.
What’s the Georgia legislature up to? Anything more interesting than this?
Only the GOP would think that a divided cell has more rights than a fully formed human female.
Amy: Your use of the term “fertilized egg” to describe a baby girl in the womb in 2014 is similar to the use of the word ni**er to describe a black woman in the field in 1850.
They are (and were) both persons, despite your effort to dehumanize them.
what’s so special about fertilization? what’s the rational basis for using this moment to establish personhood? is it because this is the moment when male material is added to the mix? i say every egg is a potential pre-born infant. fertilized or not. this monthly aborting of unfertilized pre-born babies has got to stop. where’s the outrage!?