SC

No Government-Funded Bowls

After a nine-year delay – and at least $400,000 in tax money down the drain – state leadYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

After a nine-year delay – and at least $400,000 in tax money down the drain – state lead
You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Related posts

SC

For Two Quiet Hours, Every Child Belonged at the South Carolina State Fair

Jenn Wood
SC

Parents Demand S.C. Charter Board Revoke School Operator’s Contract

Dylan Nolan
SC

Parents To Stage Walkout Of South Carolina Charter School

Dylan Nolan

16 comments

CNSYD August 14, 2013 at 10:48 am

Tickets sold and people in the seats are two different things. When counting up the revenue it is tickets sold only that counts. There are other revenue streams unrelated to the attendance. That is how most bowl games “turn a profit”. Similarly, look at all the empty seats at NFL preseason games. Yet the seats were sold as season ticket holders are usually “forced” to buy preseason game tickets.

Reply
CNSYD August 14, 2013 at 10:48 am

Tickets sold and people in the seats are two different things. When counting up the revenue it is tickets sold only that counts. There are other revenue streams unrelated to the attendance. That is how most bowl games “turn a profit”. Similarly, look at all the empty seats at NFL preseason games. Yet the seats were sold as season ticket holders are usually “forced” to buy preseason game tickets.

Reply
Jackie Chiles August 14, 2013 at 10:58 am

Glad our illustrious leaders think the people of Charleston want to see two crappy teams from crappy conferences see a game played in the freezing cold of December/January. Seems like a money pit.

Reply
Manray9 August 14, 2013 at 11:25 am

Agree, but is it freezing in Charleston in Dec?

Reply
GreenvilleLwyr August 14, 2013 at 11:50 am

It’s certainly not 75 and balmy. Probably closer to Birmingham, which Will still bitches and moans about.

Reply
Jackie Chiles August 14, 2013 at 10:58 am

Glad our illustrious leaders think the people of Charleston want to see two crappy teams from crappy conferences see a game played in the freezing cold of December/January. Seems like a money pit.

Reply
Manray9 August 14, 2013 at 11:25 am

Agree, but is it freezing in Charleston in Dec?

Reply
GreenvilleLwyr August 14, 2013 at 11:50 am

It’s certainly not 75 and balmy. Probably closer to Birmingham, which Will still bitches and moans about.

Reply
Manray9 August 14, 2013 at 11:02 am

“Economic impact” — isn’t that similar to the rationale for using taxpayer money to bribe companies to relocate to the “business paradise” known as South Carolina? Funny what Republicans think is good stewardship. About the only up-to-date and well-maintained infrastructure in the state are football stadiums.

Reply
Manray9 August 14, 2013 at 11:02 am

“Economic impact” — isn’t that similar to the rationale for using taxpayer money to bribe companies to relocate to the “business paradise” known as South Carolina? Funny what Republicans think is good stewardship. About the only up-to-date and well-maintained infrastructure in the state are football stadiums.

Reply
Squishy123 August 14, 2013 at 11:42 am

Sponsoring a bowl isn’t the responsibility of a government.

Reply
Squishy123 August 14, 2013 at 11:42 am

Sponsoring a bowl isn’t the responsibility of a government.

Reply
Crooner August 14, 2013 at 11:43 am

Interesting that in a state where tourism is the number one industry you oppose government fostering that.

Reply
Crooner August 14, 2013 at 11:43 am

Interesting that in a state where tourism is the number one industry you oppose government fostering that.

Reply
IMMAHANGUPPENLISSEN August 14, 2013 at 12:16 pm

Sun Belt vs MAC? Fuck that noise.

Reply
IMMAHANGUPPENLISSEN August 14, 2013 at 12:16 pm

Sun Belt vs MAC? Fuck that noise.

Reply

Leave a Comment