Uncategorized

How To End Those Sugar Subsidies

This website has written extensively against federal sugar subsidies – including a post that called out fiscal conservative U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio for supporting them. Why? Because as we noted in our opposition to the recent federal “farm bill,” these subsidies distort the marketplace – creating higher prices for American…

This website has written extensively against federal sugar subsidies – including a post that called out fiscal conservative U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio for supporting them.

Why? Because as we noted in our opposition to the recent federal “farm bill,” these subsidies distort the marketplace – creating higher prices for American consumers (and expanded obligations for American taxpayers).

“This is one of many bastardizations of the American free market (or what’s left of it) – a scam in which tax dollars support subsidies for certain politically connected interests while the rest of us get stuck with the tab,” we wrote earlier this spring.

Now an effort is underway which pro-taxpayer advocates at Americans for Limited Government are branding “the best chance in decades to actually get rid of U.S. sugar tariffs and quotas.”

According to a letter from numerous limited government advocacy groups obtained by NetRight Daily, the federal government is being encouraged to implement “zero-for-zero” trade deals with foreign countries that also engage in market distorting policies.

“We urge Congress to consider a zero-for-zero strategy where U.S. trade officials aggressively target foreign market-distorting policies,” the letter states. “Once these subsidies are removed, U.S. sugar producers have agreed to eliminate the U.S. sugar program, which consists of non-recourse loans, marketing quotas and tariffs.”

That’s a great idea …

Our government has all sorts of economic leverage it could bring to bear in negotiating these deals – most notably a willingness to stop distorting the market here in America.

Let’s hope this happens. If leaders in America and other countries truly care about lowering prices for their consumers they will take immediate steps to get government out of the subsidy business. After all, as French economist Fredric Bastiat once noted, “when goods don’t cross borders, soldiers do.”

***

Related posts

Uncategorized

Woman is elected president of the world

John
Uncategorized

Man eats a hamburger from 1937

John
Uncategorized

Murdaugh Retrial Hearing: Interview With Bill Young

Will Folks

10 comments

southmauldin June 21, 2013 at 12:27 pm

Rubio is pulling what I refer to as “a Sanford”, where a politician preaches about the evils of big government and big spending, but when a bill such as a sugar subsidy or a flood insurance program rears its ugly head, they inevitably vote “in the interests of my constituents”.
Fucking hypocrites.

Reply
CNSYD June 21, 2013 at 1:32 pm

How did Rubio get elected? By his constituents. So he should vote against what they want (and probably sent him to do)?

Reply
southmauldin June 21, 2013 at 1:44 pm

They are just as hypocritical as he is – they want to end everyone else’s subsidies and tax breaks while keeping theirs. So, as usual, they get the type of politician they deserve.

Reply
southmauldin June 21, 2013 at 12:27 pm

Rubio is pulling what I refer to as “a Sanford”, where a politician preaches about the evils of big government and big spending, but when a bill such as a sugar subsidy or a flood insurance program rears its ugly head, they inevitably vote “in the interests of my constituents”.
Fucking hypocrites.

Reply
CNSYD June 21, 2013 at 1:32 pm

How did Rubio get elected? By his constituents. So he should vote against what they want (and probably sent him to do)?

Reply
southmauldin June 21, 2013 at 1:44 pm

They are just as hypocritical as he is – they want to end everyone else’s subsidies and tax breaks while keeping theirs. So, as usual, they get the type of politician they deserve.

Reply
Soft Sigh from Hell June 22, 2013 at 11:45 am

Very few of Rubio’s constituents work for or are invested in the sugar industry, but some of the latter are vastly rich . . . and Cuban. We pay too much (directly and indirectly) for sugar because anti-Castro Miami Cubans benefit politically and monetarily. Been that way for decades.

Reply
Soft Sigh from Hell June 22, 2013 at 11:45 am

Very few of Rubio’s constituents work for or are invested in the sugar industry, but some of the latter are vastly rich . . . and Cuban. We pay too much (directly and indirectly) for sugar because anti-Castro Miami Cubans benefit politically and monetarily. Been that way for decades.

Reply
9" June 22, 2013 at 11:53 pm

I had a dog named,’sugar butt’.He’s in a better place,now, but still wants to dookie in your honky,redneck,maw.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65EoK4OelZU

Reply
9" June 22, 2013 at 11:53 pm

I had a dog named,’sugar butt’.He’s in a better place,now, but still wants to dookie in your honky,redneck,maw.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65EoK4OelZU

Reply

Leave a Comment