S.C. Gov. Nikki Haley received a (roughly) $22.8 billion budget this week from the S.C. General Assembly … but only by a whisker.
The budget plan for the coming fiscal year – approved earlier in the week by a conference committee of S.C. House members and State Senators – breezed through the Senate by a 39-5 margin. However the wheels came off in the S.C. House, as more than a dozen Republicans were not present in the chamber at the time of the vote. Meanwhile Democrats voted almost uniformly against the spending plan – furious over the fact it (gasp) contained a modest array of parental choice programs for disabled children.
As a result of GOP absences and Democratic obstinance, the budget nearly failed …
In fact had S.C. Speaker Bobby Harrell (RINO-Charleston) not convinced a pair of Democrats to vote in favor of the spending plan, it would have been defeated. With Harrell’s nudging, the vote in the House was 54-52 in favor of the budget.
(Note: Mainstream media are referring to the spending plan as a $6.7 billion budget, however their calculation does not include roughly $7.6 billion in federal funds appropriated to state government and $8.5 billion in “other funds,” paid for by South Carolina taxpayers in the form of fees and fines).
While we believe this spending plan is every bit as misguided as previous budgets passed by fiscally liberal S.C. legislative majorities (namely in that it continues to pump money into failing institutions and a dysfunctional government structure), there are a few good things worth pointing out.
For starters, it is approximately $300-400 million smaller than the spending plan which passed a year ago due a decline in federal funds. Also, the state’s Medicaid rolls were not expanded – at least not beyond the level Haley has already grown them.
That’s a good thing, although we suspect there will be a hard push next year on behalf of this expansion.
On the infrastructure issue, the budget appropriates $91 million in new money to road repairs based on objective criteria, not political considerations. Of course this expenditure pales in comparison to the hundreds of millions of dollars the S.C. Department of Transportation has wasted in recent years on totally unnecessary projects – and proposes to continue wasting on unnecessary projects.
The biggest victory in the budget? School choice.
For the first time in its history, South Carolina has taken a tentative first step in the direction of market-based academic reform – approving modest choices for special needs children as well as tax credits for teachers who have to buy their own school supplies.
“This is a first step, but it’s a very important step,” S.C. Sen. Tom Davis (R-Beaufort) said. “Our job now is to expand this proviso and get these measures placed into permanent law, with the ultimate objective being choice for every family in South Carolina.”
(We’ll have more on the choice proposals in a future post, so stay tuned for that …)
Of course in typical South Carolina fashion, this small step forward was accompanied by a costly step backward – specifically $21 million to expand government-run early childhood education per the suggestion of U.S. President Barack Obama.
Obviously we hope this will be the first of many items the governor cuts – in fact fiscal conservatives are expecting Haley to wield a much bigger budget axe this year.
A year ago, Haley issued seventy-four budget vetoes totaling less than $60 million – or one quarter of one percent of the state’s $23 billion budget. The previous year, she cut just $213 million – or less than one percent of that year’s $22.1 billion spending plan.
***
32 comments
Tom Davis is a Koch/Rich corporate education whore.
So, what’s new?
Tom Davis is a Koch/Rich corporate education whore.
So, what’s new?
Sorry to go off topic, but could someone find her another goddamn jacket? Its at least shown up in three different pics…how often does she change her underpants?
LMAO ! ! !
once they get really nasty brown and bloody/crusty,she buy new ones,but they always smell like curry
fits didn’t mind squeezing that curry box though – still waiting for his book
Perhaps Will is channeling his book through Nikki’s’ sister?
That’s an insult to curry.
-1
I want to see a photo of Nikki from the waist down – all we get from Will is from the waist up. Unless, she is on a pedestal?
Sorry to go off topic, but could someone find her another goddamn jacket? Its at least shown up in three different pics…how often does she change her underpants?
LMAO ! ! !
once they get really nasty brown and bloody/crusty,she buy new ones,but they always smell like curry
fits didn’t mind squeezing that curry box though – still waiting for his book
Perhaps Will is channeling his book through Nikki’s’ sister?
That’s an insult to curry.
-1
I want to see a photo of Nikki from the waist down – all we get from Will is from the waist up. Unless, she is on a pedestal?
State employees got a paycut with this budget. No pay raise and a .5% increase in state retirement tax. But legislators will get to keep their airplanes, they will continue to fly their girlfriends to USC and Clemson football games without having to name them on the flight manifests.
Only in Gubmint is no increase in pay a paycut, glad of it though:)
To bad about the Scum on the hill getting the planes. I haven’t come down on this yet, though the girlfriend thing is strictly illegal. I agree with that. Are the planes that much more expensive than all the travel they usually do? My guess is coach is cheaper, but hell…maybe we ought to just tie them to the wings. What’s left when they land could still legislate more effectively than they do now. ;)
State Employees are fortunate. They should require all state employees to work until age 70 to get retirement and then retirement should only be 25% of the average wage of the employee over their entire term of employment with a minimum of 30 years of service to retire less any social security received. This should be a maximum received. People in private industry do not get the benefits of people in state and county government. These giveaways to state and county employees must stop. I thought this was a republican state.
It is a Republicrat/Demlican state. I’m not sure about the 25% though. I don’t know how the contributions work. If they invest there money in retirement they should get out of it what they put in. But definitely not any matching funds. I also think they should cut their pay in half or more.
There is no way the salaries these people receive is competitive. Further, many many positions can only be found in gubmint. To highly specialized.
I’d like to see half the positions eliminated as well. As to the inevitable comment of ‘Longer Lines, Fewer Services’… Yeah :) That’s the point!!
State employees got a paycut with this budget. No pay raise and a .5% increase in state retirement tax. But legislators will get to keep their airplanes, they will continue to fly their girlfriends to USC and Clemson football games without having to name them on the flight manifests.
Only in Gubmint is no increase in pay a paycut, glad of it though:)
To bad about the Scum on the hill getting the planes. I haven’t come down on this yet, though the girlfriend thing is strictly illegal. I agree with that. Are the planes that much more expensive than all the travel they usually do? My guess is coach is cheaper, but hell…maybe we ought to just tie them to the wings. What’s left when they land could still legislate more effectively than they do now. ;)
State Employees are fortunate. They should require all state employees to work until age 70 to get retirement and then retirement should only be 25% of the average wage of the employee over their entire term of employment with a minimum of 30 years of service to retire less any social security received. This should be a maximum received. People in private industry do not get the benefits of people in state and county government. These giveaways to state and county employees must stop. I thought this was a republican state.
It is a Republicrat/Demlican state. I’m not sure about the 25% though. I don’t know how the contributions work. If they invest there money in retirement they should get out of it what they put in. But definitely not any matching funds. I also think they should cut their pay in half or more.
There is no way the salaries these people receive is competitive. Further, many many positions can only be found in gubmint. To highly specialized.
I’d like to see half the positions eliminated as well. As to the inevitable comment of ‘Longer Lines, Fewer Services’… Yeah :) That’s the point!!
you really looking to run off traffic with this bitch pics
from: fits to:haley
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CykE5DFJVr0
Good choice!
you really looking to run off traffic with this bitch pics
from: fits to:haley
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CykE5DFJVr0
Good choice!
I got one question only: will we bring in $22.8 in revenue?
I got one question only: will we bring in $22.8 in revenue?
What am I missing, why were GOP members absence from the vote? Is abstaining not an option?
What am I missing, why were GOP members absence from the vote? Is abstaining not an option?