SC Politics

S.C. Supreme Court Paves The Way For Release Of Palmetto Voter File

Supreme court sides with state, tosses voter data injunction…

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
by JENN WOOD *** The fast-moving legal showdown over whether South Carolina must hand over its
You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Related posts

SC Politics

S.C. Senate Schedules Another Hearing On Total Abortion Ban

Will Folks
SC Politics

Columbia’s Choice: Keep Good Going? Or Bring Back Corruption?

Will Folks
SC Politics

SC Votes: Chairman Slams ‘Toxic, Hostile’ Workplace Under Former Leader

Will Folks

9 comments

Tom September 11, 2025 at 6:49 pm

This state will literally do anything Trump tells its spineless governor to do. Say goodbye to any privacy you ever though you had. States like ours will willingly hand over to the goon squads all the information they need to track your every move. This is what you voted for.

Reply
CongareeCatfish Top fan September 12, 2025 at 10:50 am

“Say goodbye to any privacy you ever though you had.” Yeah…um.. we all kinda’ did that after the Patriot Act was passed about 20 years ago, then let Google and Microsoft run amok, then had the Obama Care interactive web application portal, and interspersed in there somewhere was the government running “Carnivore” software and all the other things that Snowden blew the whistle on. That cat has been out of the bag and climbing trees long before this little scuffle came along.

Reply
Anonymous September 11, 2025 at 8:03 pm

Senator Hutto can buy the info to use in his election campaign , but does not want the doj to have it.
What a joke !

Reply
Ed September 11, 2025 at 8:13 pm

Senator Hutto can buy this info for his campaign info, but does not want the DOJ to have it

Reply
Nunc Pro Tunc September 11, 2025 at 11:23 pm

Goldstein’s Order is “clearly erroneous”??? Hell No! Her Order is clearly FRIVOLOUS!

She should be prosecuted and jailed. She had NO jurisdiction. When there is No jurisdiction, a judge has No immunity. Case law is clear in that regard.

When her husband was the attorney for Dorchester County School District 2, he blocked the release of the names of the district’s employees under the SC Freedom of Information Act. The Act is clear, that the names of government employees are NOT exempt from release. The ACT mandates upon request they SHALL be provided upon request by anyone making a request. Arnold and the School Board willfully and knowingly Violated the law. The SC Dept of Education was appalled by Goldstein’s and the School Board’s illegal conduct. Arnold should have been disbarred and the Board should have been punished by the SC State Ethics Commission.

Reply
Bill Sandifer’s Bullwhip Top fan September 12, 2025 at 3:52 am

You pave the way not the wave

Reply
CongareeCatfish Top fan September 12, 2025 at 10:51 am

True, but now I kinda want to see a paved wave. Gotta be one at a San Diego skate park somewhere!

Reply
LaketahoeZ Top fan September 12, 2025 at 11:43 am

I think South Carolina pays attention to Jenn Wood and Fitsnews.

Nice reporting.

Reply
Tread on SC September 12, 2025 at 1:08 pm

What happened to SC? Sad to see the state government bending over backwards to allow the feds additional access to a state database of citizen’s private data.

Reply

Leave a Comment