|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Los Angeles On Edge; What Comes Next?
A harbinger of violence to come?
previous post
A harbinger of violence to come?
|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
10 comments
Here’s a legitimate question that no conservative will never answer. Why are the ICE crackdowns happening in places like LA and Chicago but not in red states who depend on migrants for farm work?
You can always count on the Mad King to fan the flames and create an “emergency” that only he can solve.
Doesn’t it just warm your libertarian hearts to see the US has a secret masked army now?
Q – Why are the ICE crackdowns happening in places like LA and Chicago but not in red states who depend on migrants for farm work?
Conservative A – Because that’s where the majority of the criminal illegal aliens live – they didn’t come here for freedom or to work, they came here to make money in whatever easy method they can by human trafficking, drug running or a million other criminal enterprises. Many farm work migrants are here legally under a variety of “farm worker” provisions. Unfortunately, many of those legal migrants are being preyed upon by the criminal illegal aliens.
Just the normal doings in an ultra liberal blue city, located in an ultra liberal blue state. While I frequently find things to question about what Trump does, I cannot fault him for the deportations or the deployment of troops to restore order.
Observe this, a lot of federal money going to poor red states comes from prosperous blue states like California, the 4th largest economy in the world.
When Pete Hegseth says there is ZERO tolerance for attacking federal agents doing their job does he mean never? Is there ever a situation where people could violently protest and attack federal agents but maybe we would forgive them and tolerate their behavior?
Just curious.
Trying to stoke up a little lawsuit business?
Nah. Just pointing out that everyone is okay with violence if they agree with the underlying motivation. If it is not obvious, a significant portion of our citizenry thinks the J6 violence was perfectly fine because they agreed with the why, and that excused the how. But the same people become some real pearl clutchers when they disagree with the why. So Hegseth’s comment is a little unbelievable.
I thought my comment was really obvious, but maybe I need to be clearer. Sorry about that. For what it is worth, this is the last place I would come for business. This is pure entertainment.
Just wondering, since all conservatives are “jack booted thugs” likely to try to overthrow the gubsmint, it would seem like Will’s “blog” would be a good place to troll.
Certainly, if there is a clear case where constitutional rights are violated, violence could be met with violence. This would be the strongest argument for the necessity of our 2nd amendment right to bear arms.
An “orgy of violence”, huh? So, how many have been maimed by protestors? And did it have anything to do with cops running over people on horseback, or hitting them with sabers? Or shooting rubber bullets at journalists?
It’s so funny how conservatives claim they need firearms in case the government overreach, but when the government starts non-discriminately arresting and detaining people without cause the conservatives cheer them on.