|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Guest Column: South Carolina Is Pro-Life, House GOP Leadership Isn’t
“Voters already made their voices heard in support of the earliest protections for babies in the womb…”
5 comments
I’m no pollster, but from what I have observed, my gut tells me that it’s a sizable number of “pro life” South Carolinians that are satisfied with a Heartbeat Bill. I don’t think voting against Harris/Waltz = supportive of a total abortion ban. Regardless of how I feel about it, I see a lot of people that want to give a woman a way out as long as she declares and acts fast.
Let’s stop calling these people pro-life. They are NOT pro-life, they are pro-birth, once the child is born and in need of education, food, clothing, housing and medical care….That is just a bridge too far and they become too expensive.
Funding being stripped from the places where they receive family planning and removing the ability to have an abortion….Well get ready to have a lot of children that will require all of those things and when that happens I don’t expect to hear a single complaint from the pro-lifers. You have a life now provide all of the care that it entails.
Haha… you two are utter clowns. Making sure babies are born so you can immediately call for them to be abandoned. Cannot wait to see how that works out at the pearly gates…but sure, go ahead and lecture us all.
Murrell Smith? Pro Life??? Pretty sure someone who is truly pro life does not defend Planned Parenthood in a lawsuit. He as with so many liberal lawyers are just liars..
A decidedly red state voting against Harris/Walz in a federal election does not equal a mandate on total abortion bans, and this is wildly irresponsible reporting to make that claim. The state has never directly put an abortion initiative on the ballot because it is afraid to hear what it’s citizens actually think. Abortion bans are wildly unpopular across the country and have been summarily rejected left and right (by left and right states).