If she is in fact a “staunch promoter of innovative public-private partnerships” then she will never have my vote. While it sounds nice, it should really be called “public- private insider grift racket.” Over and over again, it is an arrangement of connected people who set up non-profits that pay huge salaries to their founders and waste huge sums of money doing things the government either ought to be handling itself, or not at all. Additionally, the nonprofit then directs portions of its funding to political contributions and other downstream nonprofits that further distribute the grift.
2 comments
If she is in fact a “staunch promoter of innovative public-private partnerships” then she will never have my vote. While it sounds nice, it should really be called “public- private insider grift racket.” Over and over again, it is an arrangement of connected people who set up non-profits that pay huge salaries to their founders and waste huge sums of money doing things the government either ought to be handling itself, or not at all. Additionally, the nonprofit then directs portions of its funding to political contributions and other downstream nonprofits that further distribute the grift.
Evette versus Wilson and Mace and an assorted state Senator or two: “In the land of the blind, the one-eyed are king.”