A more accurate term would be “heirs at law” (as determined by the SC intestacy statutes), as opposed to “beneficiaries” (which generally denotes individuals designated by the Decedent in a Will or otherwise, such as beneficiaries designated for life insurance, annuities, IRAs, 401k’s, etc.)
In the absence of a spouse or children, SC intestate heirs would next be her parents — although her mother’s conviction should bar her under the “Slayer Statute.”
Next would be grandparents. Or if none, then aunts/uncles and their descendants for any deceased ones.
6 comments
What beneficiaries could Christina possibly have?
She has relatives imbecile.
A more accurate term would be “heirs at law” (as determined by the SC intestacy statutes), as opposed to “beneficiaries” (which generally denotes individuals designated by the Decedent in a Will or otherwise, such as beneficiaries designated for life insurance, annuities, IRAs, 401k’s, etc.)
In the absence of a spouse or children, SC intestate heirs would next be her parents — although her mother’s conviction should bar her under the “Slayer Statute.”
Next would be grandparents. Or if none, then aunts/uncles and their descendants for any deceased ones.
Who are the beneficiaries?
Who are yours?
Thanks SCNative for explaining the “heirs at law” terminology.