|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Constitutional Carry Becomes The Law In South Carolina
Henry McMaster’s signature makes South Carolina the 29th state in America to allow permit-less carry …
7 comments
This should have been done many decades ago! It is long past due but I am glad it is finally here. I have my permit and other creds that I carry off of, but I am happy for the citizenry of South Carolina, and especially 18-20 year olds, who have had their rights partially restored by this law!
It’s about time that “We The People…” got some of our rights back which were illegally stolen by the government. Now we need to keep an eye on the government as they will try to take this Constitutional right away from us again, along with others.
It is hilarious watching the inept local MSM botch this story. WACH and WIS both keep referring to this law as “open carry” or as “allowing citizens to openly carry” a firearm. It is more accurately known as “permitless carry” or by some as “Constitutional Carry”, which allows for open or concealed carry without a permit. The permit system has also been improved in that 18 to 20 year old adults can now obtain them, as they have been able to do in some states for years. While not technically “Constitutional” due to infringements still being held in place by statute, it is a big step in the right direction.
Roly Poly Judi Gatson at WIS has been openly siding with Mom’s Demand Action (if you saw them you’d know why they aren’t getting any) and affiliated hand-wringers. It is sad to see this once vibrant reporter descend into journalistic obscurity as her weight piles on, while struggling for some semblance of relevancy.
Dylan Nolan, thank you for your accurate and thoughtful coverage of this story. Other local media outlets could learn from you.
“ACH and WIS both keep referring to this law as “open carry” or as “allowing citizens to openly carry” a firearm.”
“which allows for open … carry without a permit”
lol
What you seem to similarly misunderstand, is that the law does not just allow open carry. It provides for open and concealed carry.
I’m not misunderstanding anything. You are mad that they are reporting something that is factually true about the bill.
No. I am mad that they are only reporting part of the story. Yeah, it is true, but they are misleading in reporting only part of it. Assuming you have both feet, it would be like me writing a story about you having bought a new pair of shoes. In stories by myself and others, we report that you bought the new shoes so that you can wear a shoe on your left foot. We never mention that you wear both shoes or that one is also worn on your right foot; just that you can now wear a shoe on your left foot. It sounds kinda dumb to people who read it and know you have both feet. To others, they wonder if you are an amputee or suffered some kind of defect at birth. This is what half-assed reporting does.