gettyimages-1472033620-960x640.jpg
Politics

Guest Column: South Carolina School Choice Law Benefits The Public

Enhancing academic performance while reducing social friction and sectarian conflict about education policy …

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
by ANASTASIA P. BODEN, BRENT SKORUP, & ALEX KHOURY In the spring of 2023, Governor Henry McMa
You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Related posts

Politics

Donald Trump And Lindsey Graham Spar Over Abortion

Dylan Nolan
Politics

Prioleau Alexander: We Did That!

E Prioleau Alexander
Politics

Sheriff’s Wife Running Unopposed After Filing For Husband’s Position

Andrew Fancher

3 comments

68f7ae42e5967cbdfd3001ce0668c414?s=100&d=mm&r=r
Teresa Whetzel Top fan February 21, 2024 at 12:37 pm

It’s great that this article is on the side of School Choice however I don’t exactly believe this will be the outcome. Many parents have moved their children to charter schools, religious schools etc, but nothing has improved in the Public Schools. Public schools that don’t have enough teachers, curriculums that are limited due to teacher shortages. Maybe Public schools that are for the majority should be the first to get improvements

Reply
9c5882a7e0f7fa5e59715306263e7db0?s=100&d=mm&r=r
JustCallMeAva Top fan February 21, 2024 at 1:27 pm

If a person wants their child to receive a “Christian” education or other religious education, then they should pay for it out of their own pocket, not with the use of my tax dollars. And converting public tax dollars to private use, at the user’s discretion, is a recipe for corruption, which this state already has quite enough of. What goes unsaid in this little free advertisement for “school choice” is that it’s regurgitated propaganda coming straight from the radical right-wing Cato Institute courtesy of the Koch family, who want to monetize public schools by converting them into choice programs, where they, of course, would make a fat profit. The arguments for “choice” also don’t account for students who have disabilities whom private schools typically refuse to enroll, but public schools must serve these kids, thereby dragging down the academic performance of a school. Pulling money out of public schools will see their hasty demise at a time when fewer students are enrolling in teacher education programs. But that’s the right-wing plan–defund public education. What they never seem to focus on is how limited the curriculum can be in some of these private, “religious” schools. But that’s another right-wing goal as well–the dumber the populace, the easier they’ll fall for con jobs like “school choice”.

Reply
e165a3dd99181bc3057f03cf227ca646?s=100&d=mm&r=r
William February 21, 2024 at 4:22 pm

Hear, hear! You hit the nail on the head. This is just a foot in the door. The ultimate goal is for the taxpayers to pick up the tab for families who want to send their kids to private schools. In the end, they want everyone, including those of us who do not even have children in school to help multi-millionaires pay for their kids’ education.

Every parent has school choice. They can choose to go to public school on the taxpayer dime, they can choose to go to private school on their dime or they can choose to home school. Ultimately what this leads to is a two-tiered education system. One for the rich and one for the poor, and the taxpayer pays for both.

Reply

Leave a Comment