|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Denied: Alex Murdaugh’s Bid For A New Trial Shot Down
Controversial ruling by former chief justice Jean Toal headed for appeal …
Controversial ruling by former chief justice Jean Toal headed for appeal …
|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
21 comments
And Toal hands down an ass beating of HarmBo and “Elick” very few expected! Not only did she deny the idiotic motion by HarmBo but she went the extra step to point out that the jury got it right in the first place. HarmBo should now have to pay court costs for the sorry case they made. Their one real witness is about as credible as Becky Hill, changing her story while being questioned as well as refuting her own sworn statement in the process.
Let’s face it, Becky Hill deserves to be impeached (fired?) for malfeasance or just plain “being stupid in office” but there was no unrefutable evidence of jury tampering, never was, never will be. “Elick” is still going to get a retrial because HarmBo will find a federal judge who is offended that the sovereign state of South Carolina chose to looks at her own case law instead of Uncle Sam’s
Judge Toal’s ruling is a travesty. She forced Z to give incomplete testimony so it would support Toal’s scheme to deny the pending motion for new trial. This followed her refusal to apply the correct standard of review. This is typical South Carolina where the rule of law does not apply. I think the appellate court will reverse and order a new trial. Hopefully, it will censure Judge Toal also .
“Z” couldn’t keep her story straight – at the trial, it was her true verdict. In deposition one it was the other jurors who influenced her, in deposition two it was Becky, in three, it was all of the above. In Toal’s court she contradicted herself. She wasn’t credible and it’s odd that 11 other jurors said – no tampering…
Don’t be so hard on hit-n-run Jean. I understand it is difficult to think clearly when you are sloshed.
Two South Carolina judges, now both retired and have nothing to lose, publicly attested to the overwhelming and compelling evidence presented at Murdaugh’s double-murder trial and that the jury rightly convicted him.
Good luck with your appeal, Harpo and Griff. Your client is a killer of his wife and child, you know he’s a killer, and you know he was rightfully sentenced to two consecutive life sentences.
Thank you for your service, Judge Newman and Justice Toal.
I have to say, everyone deserves a competent defense lawyer, even if you are guilty as sin you should have access to some kind of representation in court. That being said, there’s no way Dick or any of the others helping Murdaugh think he’s innocent. I can’t imagine getting any meaningful amount of sleep during the night or not have my skin crawling throughout the day in their shoes.
It is all about money, money, money for Murdaughs attorneys! I wonder where the money is coming from to pay them?
You missed one very important factor in Judge Toal’s decision. It concerned Juror Z. Juror Z stated that what changed her mind to vote guilty was not Becky, but the other Jurors in the room during deliberations. Judge Toal made it clear that they do not delve into jury deliberations.
One more thing: I do NOT like the fact that these attorneys feel free to go around and harass jurors after the trial has ended concerning why the voted. In fact, I find it appalling.
Completely agree!
Absolutely agree with that. It’s disgraceful and disgusting, but I guess I don’t expect anything else from Dick and Jim. They leave me with a sour taste in my mouth with their demeanor, press conferences and the Fox Nation documentary. My door would’ve been slammed in their faces. All the news media is going with that Hill influenced her vote (without putting an asterisk on it) and do not say anything about what the affidavit said. I want to know what she wanted to clarify.
Totally agree!
Yeah, yeah, yeah, tell it to the judge. . . wait, they did and they got shot down, and rightfully so. Their own star witness did not corroborate her own statement. As the judge pointed out, juries deliberate. The star witness admitted, under oath, and on the stand, that it was her fellow jurors who swayed her. So much for Dick and Jim’s “brilliant” defense. First rule of lawyering is never put a witness on the stand if you don’t know what they’re going to say. But those two clowns thought she’d stick to THEIR story, that Hill’s behavior changed her vote. I mean, it is what she said in her affidavit to them. Until she hit the stand and told the TRUTH. I don’t think the general public gets how rare a successful appeal is. Jim and Dick decided to ignore the second part of the law and go in deep on the first, saying it did not apply to them (because they’re geniuses). Too bad they met a judge who bitch-slapped them back to reality. Murdaugh is where he belongs, jail. His legal defense team should be disbarred for even attempting such a boneheaded defense but yeah, they are going to suck every last cent out of the Murdaugh family. One more thing, back when dinosaurs ruled the earth, I worked at an agency that was usually served with a copy of an appeal every single time a jail house “attorney” would attempt to get themselves a new trial. There was one noted murderer in particular who filed appeals every damn week. He had his own file drawer (full) he filed so frequently. Ultimately, none of his appeals were successful and he died in prison. I imagine this is what awaits Murdaugh’s future. After his not-so-brilliant defense team drains every last penny they can get our of the Murdaughs, he’ll begin submitting his own attempts at an appeal (written in pencil) and will fail to even so much as get an evidentiary hearing.
Great assessment! How many appeals do these idiots get? Will they be allowed more court time until they find a judge who gives him a new trial? Insane!
On no!!!! Not in pencil, WE provide Elick with a tablet!!!!!
Disagree with any comment that ruling by Judge Toal is controversial. I thought it was well reasoned and based on the facts garnered at the hearing. Correct result.
Fitsnews has this wrong – disappointed in Fitsnews! Judge Toal has it right! Many comments above clearly explain about Juror X testimony yesterday being different from the affidavit she signed previously. This wasn’t about Becky Hill’s behavior but about whether her comments influenced their vote!
Becky Hill can thank Dick Poot for all of her problems and the $$$ she has had to spend to defend herself. She made mistakes, but Dick’s friend attorney McCullough found the one juror who was willing to compromise her original “guilty” verdict long after the trial ended. Just think, Dick is a S.C. Senator!
Elick, knows he killed his family! SMH
The AG says its time to move on after Judge Toal’s decision. Let’s turn a blind eye and wrap this up and shove the carcass of this case away. It’s only time to move on after ALL THE CASES associated with this family are reviewed and corrected. There are a lot of people suffering still in this State from the corruption and control of the justice system by Murdaugh et al. The family lines, which the AG knows well, still control these levers. Amazing, this isn’t the story carried forward from this mess.
Of juror Z, you say, “that [Hill’s] tampering influenced the juror’s guilty verdict.” That’s inaccurate. Z said *she* interpreted Hill’s comment as implying he may be guilty but didn’t say it’s why she [Z] voted him guilty. In contrast, her affidavit said her decision was swayed during deliberations. Other jurors heard it but didn’t interpret it that way. Minds get changed during deliberations on a routine basis. That’s what they’re for. Also, it’s possible for tampering to occur without it working, which is what may have happened here and why the conviction can stand AND Hill can be found guilty of tampering.
Looks like FITS is all alone considering Justice Toal’s ruing “controversial.”