|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
South Carolina Supremes: Retiring Judge Lacked Authority To Release Gang Leader
Shedding more light on the illegal, unconstitutional release from prison of convicted killer Jeroid J. Price …
6 comments
This opinion came out over two weeks ago. Old news. Try to keep up, FITS.
Is this all you have? But we have your MAC address. *smiles*
How about the press association sue to have the family court proceedings involving Timmons, Rallis et al unsealed. If the Supreme Court follows it own precedent the family court judge should be admonished and the case unsealed
A 74 year- old retiring judge with almost 30 years on the bench doesn’t have job security or a promotion on his mind when he does something like this. A judge of such seniority in this high-population circuit also would know the particular law in question – which has been around for 13 years- pretty damn well. So it’s not that he misunderstood or was unfamiliar with the law. This clandestine deal was done either because of a major, major personal friendship to Rutherford, or some other form of quid pro quo. Since FITS is over 2 weeks behind on this story, maybe they can sharpen their pencil and vault ahead to find out if it is the former or the latter.
Who cares. 2 weeks, 4 weeks, whatever. With that said, what are your real motives behind your attack?
I am not surprised that SC judges are getting caught committing criminal acts from the bench. Its like a Family Court judge who was thrown off the bench. She took jurisdiction when she had none over the SC FOIA. She declared the SC legislatures were wrong to NOT exempt the names of public employees from release under the Act. Thus, she made an Order that the names of public Dorchester 2 school employees shall not be released. There were corrupt attorneys involved with her. All are still facing the filing of criminal complaints against them for, among other things, criminal conspiracy. And yes, there is direct evidence.
Courts have stated unequivocally that the judicial title does not render its holder immune from responsibility even when the criminal act is committed behind the shield of judicial office.
To the law enforcement internet operatives who troll FITS: what say you? Still peeking in even on emails and social media messages?