Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
‘Crossover Week’ has come and gone at the South Carolina State House. This is a key procedural deadline which determines which bills do — and all too often don’t — get approved by the time the legislative session ends. If a bill hasn’t “crossed over” from one chamber to the other by this point, chances are petty good it will still be stuck there when the gavel bangs in May signaling the end of the current legislative session.
There are many measures stuck in this legislative limbo. Some of them are eminently worthy of consideration – including a bill christened the Compassionate Care Act by its supporters. This legislation would permit the use of medicinal marijuana (which proponents refer to by its scientific name, ‘cannabis’) to provide relief for people suffering from serious pain. The Senate medical affairs committee advanced the bill to the full Senate in February. And there it still sits.
But its leading supporter isn’t giving up hope. In fact, he’s downright hopeful.
***
“It’s gonna happen sometime this year before we adjourn,” senator Tom Davis of Beaufort told me. “I feel confident there’s going to be an opportunity for the bill to be debated.”
Davis says there’s a parliamentary pathway that could flank the current hold blocking the bill but that “once it is debated, I feel confident we can get it passed.”
“It passed last year, 28 to 15,” Davis reminded readers, referring to an identical bill which cleared the Senate a year ago before being procedurally blocked in the House.
Any forward movement on the bill would encourage people dealing with conditions such as epilepsy, neurological disorders, chronic pain, PTSD, intense nausea, and other side effects accompanying chemotherapy and the family members who care for them.
Jill Swing knows what that’s like. Her 15-year-old daughter has cerebral palsy and epilepsy, which led her to found the non-profit Compassionate Care Alliance.
(Click to View)
“It’s very frustrating to me to have a child who needs this medication,” Swing shared. “I’ve taken her out of state so it could be administered legally under a doctor’s care and guidance in another state. And I’ve seen firsthand the positive impact that it has on her. And I’ve heard dozens upon dozens of similar stories from our military veterans and family members. It’s so disheartening to see this lack of courage among our lawmakers to do what’s right for people who are suffering. I feel like the pushback for a long time was coming from SLED (the S.C. State Law Enforcement Division).”
A spokesperson for SLED – which has previously opposed medicinal marijuana – declined to comment for this story.
However, SLED chief Mark Keel previously published a guest column on this news outlet back in April of 2021 articulating his views on medical marijuana decriminalization.
“I am compassionate to those who are suffering from debilitating diseases and illnesses,” Keel wrote. “However, this is why I support continued clinical trials; research; and forms of medicine that are legally obtained, FDA approved, prescribed by a physician, and dispensed by a pharmacist. This is what medicine is in the 21st century. This bill does not follow that model, which is why, in my opinion, this bill is not about medicine. It’s about legalizing marijuana in South Carolina.”
Davis pointed out the measure waiting to be brought to the Senate floor has tough safeguards to prevent abuse.
“This bill, from top to bottom, now is a very conservative, safe bill,” Davis said. “You’ve got doctors on the front end who have to authorize a patient’s use. You’ve got pharmacists on the back end who will dispense the cannabis to patients and consult with the patients. You’ve got regulation, every step of the process from the growing the processing to the dispensing. You have seed-to-sale tracking to make sure there’s no diversion. We’ve looked at the 37 or 38 states now that have already legalized medical cannabis. And we have taken from the best of all those laws. And we’ve come up with a bill that is a conservative template for states that want to empower doctors, that want to help patients but also want to draw a bright line against recreational use. This is that model bill.”
(Click to View)
Nationally, momentum is on the side of allowing the treatment. Kentucky recently authorized medical marijuana, and North Carolina’s legislature is poised to do likewise soon.
Davis further noted permitting the practice would provide security for patients who are forced to turn to illicit suppliers for the treatment they seek.
“There’s going to be somebody who’s so desperate to get relief that they go out there and buy marijuana in an unregulated market, and it’s going be contaminated or have fentanyl, and they’re going to die,” he said. “And that’s going be on our hands.”
For Swing and other families dealing with a loved one who suffers chronic pain, the wait is all too often a losing race against time.
“It is frustrating,” she said. “I’ve watched so many people who are advocating for this three, four, or five years ago. A lot of the children, sadly, have died. When memories pop up on Facebook, it is a very difficult thing to be reminded of that fact. I had one of those pop up a couple of days ago, and it’s heart-wrenching to think back to all those stories.”
Davis insists hope is on the legislative horizon.
“I think ultimately this is going to be a bill that South Carolinians can be very proud of.”
***
ABOUT THE AUTHOR …
J. Mark Powell is an award-winning former TV journalist, government communications veteran, and a political consultant. He is also an author and an avid Civil War enthusiast. Got a tip or a story idea for Mark? Email him at mark@fitsnews.com.
***
WANNA SOUND OFF?
Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our articles? Or an issue you’d like to proactively address? We have an open microphone policy here at FITSNews! Submit your letter to the editor (or guest column) via email HERE. Got a tip for a story? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question or a glitch to report? CLICK HERE.
***
*****
11 comments
Mark Powell has been indispensable lately on this site. Keep it up.
Your reply was dope!
Do you really think the Party that wants to give women the death penalty for having an abortion from a medical provider is going to let you have medical weed?
lol
Bless your heart
Truth!
My recommendation on analyzing this: mentally turn the clock back 20 years, before the opioid crisis exploded. Now, look at the proposed bills, and everywhere you see the word “cannabis,” replace it with the word “oxycodone.” And then ask yourself, honestly, with the benefit of hindsight on opioids: would this “safe, conservative” bill have prevented the opioid crisis while still allowing them to be used under closely guarded conditions? Are there loopholes so large for prescribing this that the gatekeeper function for public safety is just an illusion – like it supposedly was with “oxy?” I don’t know the answer to this question, but I’d submit that this would be a good way to examine these proposed laws.
There is no comparison between opioids, which have killed thousands upon thousands by overdose, and cannabis, which has zero overdose deaths in all of recorded history.
Bad analogy.
Catfish, u done been smoking dat crack
Not really. Oxy definitly has a higher body count, but my issue is how the law is drafted and exercising proper control. How many people have died because of alcohol, (i.e. car wrecks, boating accidents, handling weapons while drunk), but not because of an overdose of alcohol? That’s the bigger picture. As to marijuana, look at Colorado – drastic increase in vehicular deaths after legalization. I’m not against legalization for medical uses per se, or across the board, I’m just against the floodgates being opened because prescriptions can be had for practically any complaint without any recourse.
Yeah, I live in Colorado.
There hasn’t been a huge uptick in traffic deaths from legalized cannabis. SC still has far more traffic deaths than Colorado. You rank at number 3 for most traffic deaths. Colorado isn’t even in the top 10.
Any other things you want to make up?
Great argument for gun control!
Good job, man!
“I don’t know the answer to this question”
…but you sure will open your mouth anyways, huh.