I hope the State is using a mock jury for feedback, so they button this up better. I’m firmly in the “guilty” camp and yet see loads of holes in the State’s assertions. They just aren’t clearing the reasonable doubt hurdle. And they are leaving it to the jury to connect the dots. One of many examples: how does killing Maggie AND Paul fix his problem?
Hope they plan to show what opioids do to a person’s judgement. Also wonder if pressure on the Satterfield case triggered him, since Maggie and Paul were the only ones who knew what really happened.
I sure hope these dudes have a time chart to clearly show where everybody was at the time of the murder for closing. Otherwise it could go completely over the jury’s heads. Wilde had good info, but too many pages to keep his story fluid.
Thank you Fitsnews team. Great work.
Although it was discussed during in camera testimony and was object to and sustained in jury testimony, I think it is very important that the jury hear that Mark Tinsley planned to sue both Maggie and Paul in court “the very next day”, if Alex continued to tamper with the proceedings of the boat case. That is the motive! It’s unfortunate he wasn’t allowed to say that in front of the jury. Alex felt he would win the boat case and without Maggie and Paul alive it would be over.
6 comments
Great coverage! Thanks for the hard work!
Charlotte Shull, Elloree
I hope the State is using a mock jury for feedback, so they button this up better. I’m firmly in the “guilty” camp and yet see loads of holes in the State’s assertions. They just aren’t clearing the reasonable doubt hurdle. And they are leaving it to the jury to connect the dots. One of many examples: how does killing Maggie AND Paul fix his problem?
Hope they plan to show what opioids do to a person’s judgement. Also wonder if pressure on the Satterfield case triggered him, since Maggie and Paul were the only ones who knew what really happened.
What happened to the broadcast?
I sure hope these dudes have a time chart to clearly show where everybody was at the time of the murder for closing. Otherwise it could go completely over the jury’s heads. Wilde had good info, but too many pages to keep his story fluid.
Where is “little house”? Bianca mentioned several times?
Thank you Fitsnews team. Great work.
Although it was discussed during in camera testimony and was object to and sustained in jury testimony, I think it is very important that the jury hear that Mark Tinsley planned to sue both Maggie and Paul in court “the very next day”, if Alex continued to tamper with the proceedings of the boat case. That is the motive! It’s unfortunate he wasn’t allowed to say that in front of the jury. Alex felt he would win the boat case and without Maggie and Paul alive it would be over.