BizHeadlines

December 2017 Jobs Report Disappoints

U.S. economy adds only 148,000 new positions …

The American economy added only 148,000 new jobs during the month of December – a weak number that comes as U.S. president Donald Trump has been busy touting his administration’s economic prowess.

Analysts were expecting to see an increase of 190,000 jobs.  Instead they got the worst employment print since July, according to data released on Friday morning by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

Last month‘s print of 228,000 new jobs was upwardly revised to 252,000, although October‘s print of 244,000 new positions was revised downward to 211,000.

All told, that’s a net loss of 9,000 positions … with job growth averaging approximately 204,000 per month (barely enough to keep pace with population growth).  For the third month in a row the nation’s labor participation rate was stuck at 62.7 percent – exactly where it was a  year ago.

Unlike the commonly reported unemployment rate, which tracks a segment of workers within the labor force, the labor participation rate tracks the size of the workforce itself.  That makes it a far better indicator of the extent to which people are gainfully employed.

Here’s the full release from the BLS …

[tnc-pdf-viewer-iframe file=”https://www.fitsnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/empsit.pdf” width=”533″ height=”800″ download=”true” print=”true” fullscreen=”true” share=”true” zoom=”true” open=”true” pagenav=”true” logo=”false” find=”true” language=”en-US” page=”” default_zoom=”auto” pagemode=””]

Trump and his “Republican” allies in congress are obviously hoping that the tax plan signed into law last month will stimulate the economy (and employment) in 2018.

Are such hopes well-founded?

Perhaps … however as we said from the beginning of last year’s tax reform debate, the GOP missed a major opportunity to provide real relief where it was needed most (i.e. the pockets of middle income earners and small business owners).

We believe this missed opportunity – not to mention a smaller-than-expected amount of relief – will necessarily limit the stimulative effect of the proposal on the consumer economy.

***

WANNA SOUND OFF?

Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our stories? Please feel free to submit your own guest column or letter to the editor via-email HERE. Got a tip for us? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question? CLICK HERE. Want to support what we’re doing? SUBSCRIBE HERE.

Banner: iStock


Related posts

Biz

‘Bidenomics’ Jobs Report: Not All It’s Cracked Up To Be

Will Folks
Biz

Guest Column: ‘Bidenomics’ Is A Nightmare For Consumer Costs

FITSForum
Biz

Spring Surge: Gas Prices On The Move

FITSNews

Leave a Comment