FeaturedSC

Offshore Drilling Advances

SEISMIC TESTING IMMINENT … The administration of Donald Trump is making good on its promise to move forward with offshore drilling in the Atlantic Ocean – issuing draft authorizations for “geophysical surveys in support of hydrocarbon exploration.” These authorizations – issued by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) – represent…

SEISMIC TESTING IMMINENT …

The administration of Donald Trump is making good on its promise to move forward with offshore drilling in the Atlantic Ocean – issuing draft authorizations for “geophysical surveys in support of hydrocarbon exploration.”

These authorizations – issued by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) – represent the first step in approving seismic testing in the Atlantic Ocean off the coasts of Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia.

Seismic testing is the process by which companies determine where oil and gas reserves are located offshore.

Environmentalists claim the sonic air guns used in such tests are harmful to marine life – and they have been making their case to residents along the Palmetto State’s coastline for several years.

Are these claims accurate?

So far, there is no evidence to support them.  Back in 2015, the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEMstated definitively that “there has been no documented scientific evidence of noise from air guns used in geological and geophysical seismic activities adversely affecting animal populations.”

Nonetheless, environmental groups are adamantly opposed to the tests.

“This threat is real and it’s coming fast,” said Nancy Pyne of Oceana, a conservation group that opposes seismic testing. “Coastal communities have the most to lose, but unfortunately their overwhelming opposition may be ignored by the Trump administration.”

Supporters of offshore drilling argue the economic benefits outweigh the potential risks.

Recent studies have shown South Carolina netting upwards of $15 billion in revenue and creating more than 50,000 new jobs during the first phase of offshore drilling – which was originally projected to run from 2025-2035.  Moreover, state government would receive an estimated $850 million in annual revenue if offshore leases were approved.

U.S. president Barack Obama initially pledged to open areas fifty miles off the coast to oil and gas exploration – but later reneged on his promise in the face of withering criticism from environmentalists. Trump campaigned on a platform of letting states decide whether to drill off of their coastlines.

Congressman Jeff Duncan of South Carolina – a staunch proponent of offshore drilling – says the Palmetto State cannot have a proper debate over this issue unless testing is conducted.

“What harm is it to look, using 21st Century technology, to find out what, of any, resources may be in the Mid and South Atlantic in order for informed – not emotional – decisions may be made about whether these resources are ever developed,” Duncan told us.  “Then we can decide if South Carolina becomes a factor in the energy independence renaissance happening in America and participating in the job creation which comes from energy development.”

Duncan added that the type of natural resources discovered could have an impact in framing the debate moving forward.

“Should natural gas be discovered in producible quantities well over the horizon off of South Carolina’s coast, the conversation within all parties might be different (than if oil is discovered) about the development of those gas resources and the jobs which come along with it,” he said.

Congressman Mark Sanford of South Carolina – a staunch #NeverTrumper – has consistently opposed offshore drilling on environmental grounds.  We reached out to Sanford in an effort to get this thoughts on the latest developments in this debate, but did not immediately receive a reply.

Our view on the issue?  As we’ve repeatedly stated, we support an “all of the above” approach to energy creation – one in which the government took reasonable steps to safeguard the environment while refraining from excessively punitive overregulation (or the subsidization of specific industries).

Basically we support whatever keeps this country’s lights on – and its motors purring – at the lowest possible cost to the consumer.

UPDATE …

Sanford weighs in …

Loading

Should South Carolina allow offshore drilling for oil and gas?

Thank you for voting
Your input matters!
Please select an option!

***

WANNA SOUND OFF?

Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our stories? In addition to our always lively comments section (below), please feel free to submit your own guest column or letter to the editor via-email HERE or via our tip-line HERE

Banner via iStock

***

Related posts

SC

North Charleston Councilman Accuses Cop Of Falsifying Police Report

Will Folks
SC

‘Carolina Crossroads’ Update: SCDOT Set To Unveil New Plan To The Public

Will Folks
SC

Federal Lawsuit Alleges Racial Discrimination in Horry County School

Callie Lyons

Leave a Comment