National Politics - 2016

Marco Rubio On Guns: Dude Nailed It

CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE … We can’t stand U.S. Senator Marco Rubio of Florida … for any number of reasons. Most egregiously in our book, he cast the deciding vote in the U.S. Senate to advance “Obamatrade” – a crony capitalist trade deal that will have disastrous economic impacts…

CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE …

We can’t stand U.S. Senator Marco Rubio of Florida … for any number of reasons.

Most egregiously in our book, he cast the deciding vote in the U.S. Senate to advance “Obamatrade” – a crony capitalist trade deal that will have disastrous economic impacts on the Palmetto State.

Still, we have an obligation to point out when candidates we don’t like (including Rubio) take the right positions on particular issues.  And Rubio did just that on the issue of the Second Amendment this week.

Granted, every “Republican” running for president zealously supports the right to keep and bear arms, but Rubio made the most of his opportunity

During a “Republican” debate dominated by the first real testy exchanges between GOP frontrunners Donald Trump and Ted Cruz, Rubio shone when the discussion turned to the “War on Guns” being waged (again) by U.S. president Barack Obama.

“If Barack Obama could confiscate every gun in America, he would,” Rubio said.

Moderator Neil Cavuto pointedly asked Rubio to explain how Obama could be against guns if gun ownership was surging in America.

“That doesn’t sound like a White House unfriendly to gun owners,”

“That sounds like people afraid the president’s going to take their guns away,” Rubio retorted.

“The Second Amendment is not an option. It is not a suggestion. It’s a constitutional right,” Rubio continued.  “This president, every chance he has ever gotten, has tried to undermine the Second Amendment.”

Indeed.

Here’s a look at the entire exchange …

(Click to play)

(Vid: Via)

Again, every GOP candidate is pro-gun.  And truth be told, Cruz has been getting better reviews from gun advocacy groups than Rubio – or any other “Republican” candidate.  And Trump has made strong Second Amendment protections a centerpiece of his front-running candidacy.

But Rubio won the issue on this night … drawing the ire of the “progressives” in the process.

“Rarely has a mainstream candidate for president engaged in promoting the theory that the White House harbors plans for gun confiscation,” the website ThinkProgress noted.

If we’ve said it once, we’ve said it a million times: More guns = less crime.  The government’s own stats prove it.  But even if they didn’t, as Rubio articulately noted – the Constitution expressly forbids government infringement on the right to bear arms.

That’s why we support civil disobedience of any gun law (federal, state or local) that infringes upon this right … and always will.

***

Related posts

National Politics - 2016

Donald Trump Outworked Hillary Clinton

FITSNews
National Politics - 2016

President-Elect!

FITSNews
National Politics - 2016

Only 1,400 Sign SC Democratic “Elector Petition”

FITSNews

54 comments

jimlewisowb January 15, 2016 at 10:39 am

Too fucking little, too fucking late

Reply
CorruptionInColumbia January 15, 2016 at 10:44 am

I wonder if Jeb is as lukewarm on gun rights as Dubya was. I recall being relieved that Dubya was in office when the abominable Clinton magazine and gun ban’s sunset finally came into view. Dubya said if Congress renewed it, he would sign it. Thankfully, Congress did not renew it, but WTF? Still, after 8 years of Clinton, we were relieved that Dubya wasn’t aggressively supporting it.

No more “settling” for second or third best!!!!

Reply
SYG January 15, 2016 at 2:35 pm

Jeb signed into law, the if I pick a fight with you and you fight back, I can legally shoot you law. Or if your appearance scares me, I can shoot you law. So yes, he’s very strong on gun owners being able to shoot whoever.

Reply
rockyverdadsuglylies January 15, 2016 at 10:46 am

Rubio was spot on.Obama would confiscate guns IF he could have found a way of not being impeached:

President Obama today praised Australia’s confiscation of firearms. Obama said: Couple of decades ago, Australia had a mass shooting, similar to Columbine or Newtown. And Australia just said, well, that’s it, we’re not doing, we’re not seeing that again, and basically imposed very severe, tough gun laws, and they haven’t had a mass shooting since.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/380033/obama-praises-australias-gun-confiscation-charles-c-w-cooke

Reply
Trump Looks Better January 15, 2016 at 11:29 am

Australia did not confiscate any guns. There was a buy-back program for certain firearms which was endorsed by 90% of citizens. The almost universally endorsed program was passed into law only 12 days after a mass shooting.
That isn’t government confiscation by any means, Jack.

Reply
Flip R. Morals January 15, 2016 at 11:53 am

Experts said that the country’s (Australia) 1996 ban on most semi-automatic firearms has actually driven criminals to those guns….????

Reply
Rocky Verdad January 15, 2016 at 1:01 pm

Have you even been to Australia?

Reply
CorruptionInColumbia January 15, 2016 at 6:04 pm

Regardless of the vehicle used to accomplished it, the bottom line is that you are still disarmed. I don’t know if the Aussie government is following the rest of the Western world yet, but if they do, let me know how safe you feel when muzzies are walking around in your towns with guns and you have none, as is now happening in Germany.

Reply
Trump Looks Better January 15, 2016 at 11:00 am

Obama isn’t a gun advocate. But confiscate guns? Horseshit. Obama signed the law that lets me carry in National Parks for the first time. And government approval for firearms purchases has vastly speeded up. Bought a tidy .357 the other week and approval took 15 minutes.
I swear Trump is the only candidate that doesn’t absolutely spew absolute lies.

Reply
erneba January 15, 2016 at 11:13 am Reply
erneba January 15, 2016 at 11:24 am

I have also purchased hand guns, five of them during the Bush administration and none of the approvals were over fifteen minutes. You are heaping praises on Obama for doing nothing.

Reply
tomstickler January 15, 2016 at 11:50 am

Feel safe enough yet?

Reply
erneba January 15, 2016 at 12:02 pm

NO !!!

Reply
Flip R. Morals January 15, 2016 at 12:06 pm

Planned Parenthoods weapons are more dangerous than guns.At least you have a chance if you are shot-a baby is DOOMED.

Reply
Trump hates Babies January 15, 2016 at 12:58 pm

Kinda like Trump cutting off paying medicals bills for a sick infant.

Flip R. Morals January 15, 2016 at 1:02 pm

The Democrat Party aborts 1.2 million children a year and you bring up a sick infant?

Boy, that will sink Trump. :)

Trump hates Babies January 15, 2016 at 1:16 pm

Trump is on board with abortion.

Tazmaniac January 15, 2016 at 6:15 pm

Guns are like golf clubs, you want a full set so all situations are covered. In addition many people like to buy beautiful firearms for display. You should try some shooting sports, you may convert.

Reply
tomstickler January 15, 2016 at 8:55 pm

Got most of that out of my system in ‘Nam.

erneba January 17, 2016 at 4:27 pm

I don’t purchase guns to “feel safe,” I purchase guns to defend and protect myself. “Feelings” have absolutely nothing to do with it.

Reply
Godslayer January 15, 2016 at 11:14 am

“If Barack Obama could confiscate every gun in America, he would,” Rubio said.
If Marco Rubio could suck my dick, he would. What a deSPICable lying piece of shit.

Reply
Bible Thumper January 15, 2016 at 12:42 pm

Obama doesn’t always publicly say what he wants. Remember him telling Putin he would make a deal after the election, when he did not know a mic was on.

Reply
Flip R. Morals January 15, 2016 at 12:43 pm

Spot on.

Reply
Rocky Verdad January 15, 2016 at 1:00 pm

And then slapped him silly with sanctions?

Reply
Flip R. Morals January 15, 2016 at 1:04 pm

LMAO!!! While Putin savages Ukraine.That showed him.

Rocky Verdad January 15, 2016 at 1:27 pm

All of Ukrain? Or is it an area around the size of West Columbia.

sparklecity January 15, 2016 at 9:44 pm

And Trump has openly stated Putin is a man he can make deals with
Your point being????

Reply
Flip R. Morals January 16, 2016 at 8:43 am

That Obama is a marxixt leaning radical Islamist.

Fantasy Land January 15, 2016 at 12:51 pm

Obama will confiscate all the guns, just like Donald will deport all the illegals. Neither will ever happen.

Reply
Tazmaniac January 15, 2016 at 11:14 am

If the polls indicated so, Rubio would support 2A repeal. The guy just doesn’t seem to have any foundation. Wherever the political wind blows, there goes Marco.

Reply
Rocky Verdad January 15, 2016 at 12:59 pm

Amen Brother!!!

Reply
Flip R. Morals January 15, 2016 at 1:13 pm

A stupid comment and false.Keep giving aid and comfort to the enemy.That is what RINO”S do.

Reply
Tazmaniac January 15, 2016 at 2:41 pm

So if Hillary joins the Republican Party then she would have your support just because of the R behind her name? That’s what idiots do. Wow, I wonder what is wrong with politics today?

Reply
TroubleBaby January 15, 2016 at 11:17 am

Marco Rubio “nailed it” like a cobbler nails heels to a boot.

Reply
cuvinny January 15, 2016 at 11:22 am

““That sounds like people afraid the president’s going to take their guns away,” Rubio retorted.”

Gun industry marketing works!

Reply
Jack January 18, 2016 at 4:16 pm

Yep, the gullible fools fall right into the trap. How do you think the GOP has been getting middle class Americans to vote against their interests.

Reply
a face in the crowd January 15, 2016 at 11:24 am

Which militia does Rubio belong to? Isn’t that part of the 2nd amendment?

Reply
tomstickler January 15, 2016 at 11:50 am

How well is it regulated?

Reply
Bible Thumper January 15, 2016 at 12:39 pm

I hear Rubio doesn’t even own a press. How can he support the first amendment.

Reply
Rocky Verdad January 15, 2016 at 12:58 pm

Cuban sandwich press, or coffee press.

Reply
Tazmaniac January 15, 2016 at 6:06 pm

Cuban sandwiches, muy authentico, in Tampa on the way to a Bucs game, great memories.

Reply
gmoney January 15, 2016 at 11:43 am

Cruz, as he did with most issues last night, actually ended up stealing the limelight from Rubio on this issue as well. Cavuto asked Rubio to cite specific reasons why he thinks Obama would confiscate everyone’s gun if he could – and Rubio hesitated and then said something about Obama holding a press conference every 2 weeks. The next time they got to Cruz he rattled off 5 or 6 specific examples. Like Ann Coulter says – if Rubio can’t give a canned response that he’s practiced in front of mirror a hundred times he’s not too impressive.

Reply
Bible Thumper January 15, 2016 at 12:36 pm

What is Ann Coulter doing observing Rubio in front of a mirror? Inquiring minds want to know.

Reply
Flip R. Morals January 15, 2016 at 12:42 pm

Haley has more policy positions than flip has Disqus accounts?

Reply
Rocky Verdad January 15, 2016 at 1:02 pm

Give it to me Dan!!!! Dan!!!!!

Reply
Billionaire Lover January 15, 2016 at 12:57 pm

Says the woman who was hoping for Romney to run again.

Reply
Tunes'n'News January 15, 2016 at 11:51 am

I love how so many articles here start with:

“We don’t like [so and so] for various reasons [link to previous articles]. However, we like this thing so and so said . . . .”

Reply
21stconfed(L) January 15, 2016 at 11:59 am

we need to stop calling it “obamatrade” and “obamacare” because republicans are unwilling to put anything on the presidents desk to stop these things. We need to call them back stabbing republican trade/care so BSRA and BSRC?

Reply
Flip R. Morals January 15, 2016 at 12:04 pm

The narcissistic and egomaniac Obama calls them that.You didn’t hear the wHite House is now called ObamaHouse?

Reply
juan biyu January 15, 2016 at 12:31 pm

Just stop with the ObamaTrade nonsense. You’ve been co-opted by right wing protectionists peddling left wing myths about free trade agreements. Rubio voted for Trade Promotion Authority, but TPA isn’t the same as a trade agreement. It’s a process vote. In fact, there’s a good chance Congress won’t pass the Trans Pacific Partnership because of Obama’s bullshit on tobacco carve out in Investor State Dispute Settlement procedures and the weak intellectual property protections for biologics. That Congress may refuse to pass TPP completely undermines the criticism that TPA will automatically result in passage of TPP.

Reply
Rocky Verdad January 15, 2016 at 12:57 pm

It’s Metro Man to the rescue. “My friend, don’t fall into the trap of the narrow lapel. Buy your jackets from Brooks Bros, and stay with the classics. Cowboy boots are passe, and the women find them offensive. A nice low key stylish pair, like my Brazilian ones, are much better. And remember, if you’re a bit short, like me, get the three inch heals. I’m almost 6 feet with them. And don’t forget to have your nails done every Friday afternoon. People make fun of me, but look at my Columbian wife. She was former Miami Dolphin cheerleader. At night, when we get really going, she screams my alter ego name, Dan!!! Dan!!!!”

Reply
James Wilson January 15, 2016 at 1:07 pm

Not a big Trump fan, but he and Rubio won the debate last night. Cruz may have one the episode on the birther topic, but I think Rubio nailed Cruz on being a politically calculating conservative that has not been consistent (even through Cruz claims he is). The more Trump and Cruz go head to head, this allows room for the 3rd and 4th place candidates to inch up in the polls.

Reply
Scooter January 15, 2016 at 9:31 pm

Ever once in awhile, High Hills gets one right.

Reply
sparklecity January 15, 2016 at 9:41 pm

“Civil disobedience of any gun law” huh???
Carry your pea-shooter into just about a police department lobby and wave it around FITS…I fucking dare you
Or better yet, go to any military base and make sure they know you are packing when you approach the guard gate…I fucking double dare you

Reply

Leave a Comment