ONLINE COLLECTIVE VOWS TO EXPOSE WHITE SUPREMACISTS IN GOVERNMENT
The anti-establishment online collective Anonymous (God bless them) is planning to release the names of prominent American elected officials and political activists with alleged ties to the Ku Klux Klan.
“Men in hoods; meet the men in masks,” a message posted to one of the sites used by the hackers reads.
That’s a reference to the Guy Fawkes masks worn by Anonymous supporters.
The names of several prominent elected officials with alleged ties to the white supremacist organization have already been leaked (here and here) – although the hackers have said they will only vouch for names they unveil on November 4-5.
In fact, the organization said it “was in no way involved with (Monday’s) release of information that incorrectly outed several politicians.”
One of the politicians “incorrectly outed?” Fiscally liberal U.S. Rep. Joe Wilson of South Carolina – whose office did not immediately respond to our request for comment regarding the allegation. Obviously we have zero use for Wilson (given his total lack of respect for taxpayers), but we’re not going to indiscriminately fit him for a white hood … nor are we going to do that to the four U.S. Senators (including Thom Tillis of North Carolina) whose names were also mentioned in the early leaks.
Tillis and Wilson are worthless establishment “Republicans” to be sure … but as far as we know they aren’t racists.
Membership in the KKK has been surging in the south in the aftermath of the contentious debate over the Confederate flag.
71 comments
“ANONYMOUS”…everything on the internet is true.
It’s not? I base everything I know in the world off of whatever the internet tells me happebed. Or in the case of Sandy Hook, what didn’t happen. Please, come take my guns. I’m too stupid to own one.
CIC never said that, you’re just one of Holder’s secret agents trying to discredit a pro-gun commenter to make your gun grabbing operations easier!
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again…I think Sandy Hook was a hoax. It never happened. It was a false-flag event perpetrated by the government to pave the way for guns to be taken away. Isn’t that what you guys believe too?!? Ask me anytime…..
Ask him. He sure has said that.
Right, CIC?
This is not even in CICs writing style. Try again troll.
I am honored. I have reached a level of status in having acquired my very own internet troll. Kinda cool actually, that someone finds me important enough, or a big enough threat, to follow me around and try to impersonate me.
…and you believe everything the government and the MSM tell you, right?
Thomas Corbin wouldn’t surprise me.
“Obviously we have zero use for Wilson (given his total lack of respect for taxpayers), but we’re not going to indiscriminately fit him for a white hood”
But we sure as hell are going to keep reminding readers of the allegation so that after enough exposure they will believe it to be true. Vintage Goebbels style propaganda.
No different than what we do with Benghazi. No proven wrongdoing, but that sure isn’t going to stop us from hounding about it every day until the 2016 election is over.
Or until we get the truth instead of total obfuscation. There’s every damn reason in the book to believe there was plenty of wrongdoing, only reason it can’t be “proven” is because the State Department and CIA can hide under the fact that the “embassy” was really a rendition site and the “mission” was really a covert CIA operation that can be kept classified.
8 Hearings and NOTHING……well, except gullible rubes like you still grasping at straws.
Trey knew his audience wasn’t very bright, so grandstanding would appear to be serious enquiry to the dumb masses back home in SC. Look like it worked perfectly on you, Mark A.
Nothing? Sure, only to people like you who bury your head in the sand. We got the fact that there is nothing but obfuscation going with the main players involved. Not to mention still no explanation as to why the video was pushed as the motivation when it was know all along by the administration and State dept that it had nothing to do with it. I can agree that the hearings were somewhat of a sham, but only because Gowdy has no benefit to be gained from house hearings that will never be allowed to disclose the operational aspects of covert CIA intelligence ops. If you actually looked into the Operation Zero Footprint directives that created the whole Libyan situation then you would have a better idea of why this whole thing is a miserable failure and stain on Obama and Hillary. That and the fact that it has a lot to do with the arming of so-called “moderate” rebels in Syria. You would rather just focus on the hearings and the fact that there was no “smoking gun”, even though there was never going to be such for reasons I’ve already explained.
Yep. You are definitely a big time sucker who bought the whole sham as a real hearing. The GOP leadership already pointed out that the hearings hurting Hillary’s poll numbers was the whole point. Even with that admission, you still regurgitate the SAME talking points they put out thete?!? Trey wanted to focus on Hillary and when an investigator started looking elsewhere he was fired and is now suing. How gullible are you? Don’t answer that….you already did above.
Try to keep up. I specifically said the hearings were a sham and I said why. Nothing of what I said was anything I have ever heard from a Republican. I wish I would have heard it from them instead of the surface level stuff they have been focusing on. All you are doing is regurgitating the same media talking points about focusing on Hillary and the firing of someone who claimed it was because he didn’t focus on her. Those have both been debunked as lies. There is no substantiation to either claim no matter how many times when you want to spew them out as evidence to support your point of view. All you want to do is focus on what one idiot Republican said about the point of the hearings and even then what he said in regards to Hillary was misrepresented. You are just deflecting from the main issues involved in Benghazi, that’s why you are focusing on the same talking points. You completely ignore the covert CIA operation aspect and the presidential directive known as Operation Zero Footprint. Understanding those are the keys to the truth about Benghazi, not some meaningless blather about Gowdy/Hillary or Murphy’s misstatement.
“Blah, blah, blah.”
Your boy Jeb! said it best.
I guess we’ll be hearing “Bengahzi!!!” from nutters for years, now.
Since YOU understand it all, why don’t you provide your services to Trey?
I mean after EIGHT fruitless hearings, culminating in 11 hours of testimony, surely they could use your expertise to FINALLY nail down that awful, criminal Hillary.
Too bad you won’t focus a micro-second on the documented lies and deciet used by Bush/Cheney to send thousand of Americans to there deaths under false pretenses. Maybe your genius could have cracked the lid on those war crimes?
More obfuscation, I see. It’s what happens when you get your presumptions blown up. As for “documented” lies, that’s exactly what the whole video diversion was. If you think there “documented” lies about Bush/Cheney, then cite them. I believe the Robb-Silbeman report and the Duelfer report both say otherwise, but continue on in your childish rant. It’s the only thing that gets you through this and keeps you from having to admit you have nothing to back up any of BS you have been spewing. Go somewhere where that nonsense will go unchallenged. You won’t get away with it here.
All I have and all I need is…
8 Hearings = ZERO charges against Hillary
GOP leaders admit hurting Hillary’s poll numbers show hearings were a success.
Are you seriously saying Bush/Cheney didn’t lie to sway public opinion for invading Iraq?
If you really give one flying fuck about ‘American lives’ you’d be up in arms about the debacle that’s been the War in Iraq. Tony Blair even said it’s one of the main reasons for the rise of ISIS, as well. Where’s your outrage there?
As I have already explained, the “all” that you have is irrelevant because it’s all technicalities. I have already explained this and you are just doubling down on the same “talking points”. Hillary’s poll numbers were due to obfuscation and lack of transparency about damn near everything. The media certainly weren’t holding her accountable for anything surrounding Benghazi or her emails. Even the interviews with survivors of the Benghazi had to be kept behind closed doors because of the cover nature of the compound and the operation. Gowdy and company know that the administration and Hillary are responsible for it and are liars but their hands are tied as to what they can substantiate with certainty and what they can reveal regarding the closed-door hearings with survivors. This is why I was not in favor of the hearings and don’t understand why they went through with them. They were only going to set up Gowdy to look bad.
I don’t care what Tony Blair said. I care what the truth is. The failure of Iraq to establish a secure gov’t is what led to ISIS. You can blame that or whoever you want. You can blame Bush for all I care. That Bush did any lying in order to get us into war is revisionist history that you liberals have a one track mind about. Denying it is akin to denying slavery, so I have no use for arguing with you about it. There were numerous hearings and commissions about it from ’05 to ’08 that turned up nothing. You want to deny those (which had much more information) but you want me to accept at face value the sham hearings on Benghazi. You can’t have it both ways. Besides, how stupid would it be for a president to lie in order to get us to go to war. Going to war is one of the most unpopular things any president could do. I bet you’re one of those conspiracy theorists who think he did it in order to gin up anti-muslim hatred or something like that. You would fall prey to that stuff. You’ve fallen prey to all sorts of other lies.
You lie!
Now, piss off bigot.
Anonymous USED to have some clout and acquired some reliable information. Ever since the SJW crowd took over and pushed out the true hackers. Anonymous is just another wing of the liberal socialist SJW crowd with a few script kiddies. The real hackers have moved own to a new group.
And your proof is?
_||_
The quality of their work has decreased. That’s all I am going to say about that.
How so? Say more.
In what ways?
_||_
He means it was funny when they targeted Scientology but now that they are outing racist Republicans his fee fees are hurt.
He should be nervous…
_||_
How long have you been a klan member? Sign up dates were not documented.
Check your data. I’m neither demographically nor religiously qualified to be a member of the Klan. I’d likely be lynched, shot, or burned for trying.
How would you know their demographics?
Well one would have to be racial pure, if anything that’s known about them is true. I am not. Figure out who’s in my avatar and that’ll give you a clue.
Too bad you’re not half as clever as you think you are….or interesting.
I’ve tried and have no idea.
Are you going to stay that sex and color?
http://kingfish1935.blogspot.com/2015/06/belhaven-grad-goes-transracial.html
?
Mr. Silent — are you from Mississippi?
i must be in need here of getting me some education.
what exactly does the acronym SJW stand for?
all i can come up with is “Single Jewish Women”.
and i’m really thinking, this can’t be right!
so i’m asking, what is SJW short for?
http://bfy.tw/ICM
I don’t know either …. it’s new to me
What’s to stop someone from paying the Klan to add some politician they didn’t like to their rolls?
Reality.
The lulz would compel such an individual to put Barack Obama as a KKK member, making it easier to spot.
That’s what I was thinking.
LOL!!!
Jackie’s already working on his defense for when his name comes up on a Klan membership list.
Why do racists often times use an African-American avatar? Like anybody can’t see through that BS.
Have I ever said anything racist?
Was Dick Harpootlian’s name on the list? Why are you ignoring that one? Most all of the names on the list were Democrats. Wasn’t the Democrat mayor of Louisville on it? Along w/ a lot other Democrats…Remember your Grand Ceegle (or whatever ya” call your leaders) was Democrat Robt. Byrd.
And: Remember the Democrat Party STARTED the Klan. All Slaveowners were Democrats…and now the Queen of the Democrat Party, who hates the first BLACK president- and is feuding w/ him because he is not lily white, like her, and her privileged family.
Going to be difficult to get 120% voter turnout in the inner-city if Obama don’t like you…LMAO…Sucks to be YOU!!!
Bingham’s attorneys get a hold of you yet. I gave them all the info I had.
He’s an obese, bitter, old white Republican living in a trailer in South Carolina. What do you mean you haven’t found him yet?
I think he hit close to your home…and outed YOU…didn’t he???…LMAO…You just described Robert Byrd….and yourself..
So Robert Byrd is not really dead, then? This is major news. What is he, like `110 now? Don’t tell the Colonel. He’ll be upset that you’ve proven there’s a major Southern Dem that joined the GOP. But wait, haven’t you been claiming that wasn’t true, too? Stop confusing yourself. And stop surrounding yourself with your self, and moving on up to square. That’s a roundabout way of saying that if you if you confuse yourself and your dozen or so SNs, you’ll confuse pogo and his 10,000 ones, and you guys never be able to keep hiding who, and what you are.
They already drastically hurt their chances for anyone to believe them by falsely making these allegations against officials with no evidence. None.
I can’t verify the authenticity of those lists, I didn’t see my name in there at least. GrandTango’s name wasn’t in there either. It is an incomplete list though so maybe we will be in the next one.
Sounds like somebody is already working on their excuse for being outed as a Klansman…
Anonymous did not make those allegations, and they have in fact stated that they do not support them.
You Democrats always have the Race CARD…You think anyway…but how much longer before that bites y’all? …
http://pastebin.com/zw1wz1Z9
They use the term “colour” instead of “color”. Wonder if they are European.
Anonymous has walked beck the list purported to have been posted by they, in fact the site it down. So is this the “pre story story”.
Obama is a Nazi!
Yeah,sure.I’m so worried
OK, so we have cyberterrorists who hide behind a keyboard to protect their “real lives” outing a bunch of racists who hide behind sheets to protect their “real lives”. KKK is irrelevant and, truth be told, a joke. Anonymous indiscriminately hurts people who disagree with them on a regular basis.
This would be the KKK that lynched White Republicans and folks of colour… to wit the closet wing of the Democrats, like the Occupy crowd behind Fawkes masks. Only the names are changed to hide the actual oppressors that prove de Tocqueville’s observation of voting ourselves every sort of largesse, RINOs in mind as well as the beltway the spirit of Dem’s Klan lives and it has a press marching in jackbooted lockstep
Seems this movement might be running into trouble before it really gets off the ground. Reference is a Washington Post article, not exactly a right-wing rag, but still a rag, nonetheless.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2015/11/02/how-anonymouss-big-kkk-dump-got-muddled-before-it-even-began/
The money quote:
Anonymous has a history of coordination information leaks against a wide range of
groups, and this isn’t the first time they’ve targeted the KKK — last
year, the group took over a KKK- affiliated Twitter account,
which they later disabled. But now, with sources and veracity of the
latest leak in question, some are wondering if the operation is now
dead, before it even began:
Abby Ohlheiser is a general assignment reporter for The Washington Post.
So if a black man applied to join the klan and was denied, could he sue for discrimination based on race? Inquiring minds want to know.
Apparently something similar has already happened. They question is what would you get from the KKK. Some old sheets, half burned crosses and maybe the six remaining teeth they have.
http://www.outhousedaily.com/2013/05/man-fired-from-klu-klux-klan-after.html
A group wih no defined structure can be impersonated by anyone. This is just early election year oublic opinion tampering by partisan political operatives.
I like Mencken’s description of the Klan–essentially “the secular arm of the Methodist Church.”
He was more familiar with fundamentalist Methodists of the north and midwest back then (almost a century ago) and if more familiar with the south would probably have added Southern Baptists.
KKK- Another evil invention of the democratic party.
ALL Ku Klux Klansmen are Republicans now.
Proof?
Insignificant troll.
Joe Wilson is fucking useless. So is his sidekick Butch Wallace.