SC

Exclusive: Massive “Hidden Tax” On South Carolinians Exposed

THE LEVY YOU NEVER KNEW YOU WERE PAYING … Just call it the “fleecing of South Carolina.&You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

THE LEVY YOU NEVER KNEW YOU WERE PAYING … Just call it the “fleecing of South Carolina.&
You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Related posts

SC

For Two Quiet Hours, Every Child Belonged at the South Carolina State Fair

Jenn Wood
SC

Parents Demand S.C. Charter Board Revoke School Operator’s Contract

Dylan Nolan
SC

Parents To Stage Walkout Of South Carolina Charter School

Dylan Nolan

17 comments

TroubleBaby October 20, 2015 at 1:53 pm

I just knew Lexington was going to be on that list before I even looked it up.

Reply
Jackie October 20, 2015 at 1:58 pm

I take back all the mean things I thought about your blog of late. You ARE still relevant …and seemingly the only watchdog for us.

Reply
Todd October 20, 2015 at 2:12 pm

I always wondered why my car insurance cost more living in SC than it did inside the city limits of Atlanta. It sure isn’t because of risk.

Reply
CorruptionInColumbia October 20, 2015 at 8:01 pm

You haven’t been observing SC drivers very long, have you?

;-)

Reply
Bible Thumper October 20, 2015 at 2:25 pm

It’s really not a problem. The money gets back to pols in the form of free retreats, conventions and seminars at convenient locations like Hilton Head or Las Vegas. All educational of course.

Reply
TroubleBaby October 20, 2015 at 3:46 pm

“Receipts for hookers should be listed as “relationship coaching for constituent relations” on your expense report. Morton’s can be listed if it doesn’t exceed your per diem but we wouldn’t suggest you itemize it by name.”

Reply
Bible Thumper October 20, 2015 at 4:08 pm

I get it.
Gambling — Risk assessment training
Strip club — Performance art.

Reply
vicupstate October 20, 2015 at 2:28 pm

The list of cities and towns has around 270+- entries listed, which if I am not mistaken, it the sum total of all incorporated cities/towns in the state.

Essentially this is a town/city fee that is collected by the Association rather than the cities/towns individually. There is a cost to that, which is what the ‘fee’ to MASC pays for. Them doing it rather than each town paying someone to handle this logically speaking would be more economical.

Businesses inside an incorporated town/city pay a business license, if this simply a per-policy substitute for that, then there really is nothing nefarious or out of the ordinary about it.

Reply
Centrist View October 20, 2015 at 2:36 pm

It may not be widely publicized, but it’s not “hidden” if it is on the MASC website.

Go to…..
Municipal Association of South Carolina
http://www.masc.sc/

….then click on
Programs
http://www.masc.sc/programs

….. then click on
Debt/Tax Collections
http://www.masc.sc/programs/debt-tax-collections

…..then click on your choice of
Brokers Tax Collection Program
http://www.masc.sc/pages/programs/solutions/collection-programs/Brokers-Tax.aspx

….. or click on
Insurance Tax Collection Program
http://www.masc.sc/pages/programs/solutions/collection-programs/Insurance-Tax.aspx

….. or click on
Setoff Debt Collection Program
http://www.masc.sc/pages/programs/solutions/collection-programs/Setoff-Debt.aspx

….. or click on
Telecommunications Tax Collection Program
http://www.masc.sc/pages/programs/solutions/collection-programs/Telecommunications-Tax.aspx

…. and you can also look on page 11 of the MASC Annual Report
https://www.masc.sc/SiteCollectionDocuments/AR_14.pdf

Reply
Sic Semper Tyrannis October 20, 2015 at 2:42 pm

I read that we’re paying a phone tax that was set up to help fund WW 1.

Reply
Mom October 20, 2015 at 3:02 pm

A private association (regardless of for profit or non-profit) should not automatically collect taxpayer money.

Reply
Thomas October 20, 2015 at 3:31 pm

If by “hidden” you mean “openly listed on the Municipal Association’s website and on the books in every city in the state” then, yeah, hidden.

Reply
TroubleBaby October 20, 2015 at 3:47 pm

“The group’s executive director Miriam Hair also told FITS that the organization’s centralized collection method creates efficiencies that save taxpayer money.”

It’s nice to know that our insurance companies are helping big brother collect his taxes from us more efficiently.

Reply
Bob Hall October 20, 2015 at 6:03 pm

Is this paid based on zip code, area code or actual physical address? If it is by zip code then people who live outside a town are being taxed.

Reply
The Mayor October 20, 2015 at 6:08 pm

The Municipal Association employees are in the State Retirement System. They make a lot of money. Their senior staff makes tons. I don’t have the salary amount now but will try to get them. If someone else has them please post..

No private entity should collect and spend tax dollars. It should be handled by the state or other political subdivision and it should be subject to the State Auditor’ office.

The expenditures should be governed by the state procurement code.

There certainly can be now doubt that this group has made an outsized profit off of our tax dollars and this should stop.

Reply
HD October 21, 2015 at 7:55 am

Holy moly! Folks has uncovered a fifty year old tax that is in no wise secret or hidden, collected and distributed by the Municipal Association as an efficiency measure. That’s some real impressive “journalism” right there.

Reply
hawk4hire October 21, 2015 at 9:03 am

Here is the part that gets me. The STATE collects the tax and then gives it to this association. “The South Carolina Department of
Insurance is required to collect the broker’s premium tax and distribute
to the Municipal Association of South Carolina the municipal portion of
the tax” .

The association then “distributes” it back to the counties for a fee. Why do we need a middle man. Why cant the state distribute it back to the munis???

Smells like a scam.

Reply

Leave a Comment