Savannah Guthrie 1, Rand Paul 0
TALK TO THE HAND … || By FITSNEWS || U.S. Senator Rand Paul’s 2016 presidential campaignYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
TALK TO THE HAND … || By FITSNEWS || U.S. Senator Rand Paul’s 2016 presidential campaignYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
23 comments
I read the comment section of the leftwing WaPo (linked by Drudge)…The comments were 20-1 against her, and cheering Rand Paul…
If you REALLY want the voters to respond, you’ll need to viciously attack the Democrats..and even more-so the Corrupt media…FITS is media…and your candidates got the living $#!t beat out of them. That should tell you something…
You’re a F*#king idiot (not news) if you scored it for her…But that is what I expect from a Dumb@$$ like FITS…
Do you have friends? Do you go outside? I seriously cannot tell if you’re a troll, or if you’re truly delusional. Hell, my responding to you is only going to contribute to your trolling ego, and help exacerbate your trolling, or delusions, to even further reaches of crazy.
Why not quit worrying about me…Dumb@$$…and concentrate on idiots, like yourself…who have severely damaged the country…
Shit…you’re a thin skin pussy like Rand Paul.
Weve started a “completely ignore” campaign on gt
Join in …
‘…Beyond that, they were (and are) disappointing commentaries on the extent to which Paul the younger lacks the consistency and political courage demonstrated by his increasingly nugatory, libertarian flake father, former U.S. Rep. Ron Paul….”
There, fixed it for you.
Show ANY interview of Obama like that and I will be impressed.
He came off like a total douche.
Seriously. Why did he walk into this thinking it was hard-hitting journalism? This is the Today show….they probably cut to him right after they finished baking Spring cupcakes or showing us how to better trim your dog’s toenails.
It may just be me, but why is it that most doctors (Paul is a doctor) think that you are not to question them? The way I see it, they’re no better than anyone else, even if they have a little more education. We as the voting public should be questioning the candidates extensively – I believe that it’s our duty as voters.
I wish Savannah Guthrie would interview a few select folks who post on this site. Can anyone guess who tops my list?
Why would you wish that on GT? Or on Savannah?
She is Chris Mathews in a skirt, and a lisp. Total left-wing fruitcake. Not a Paul (either one) fan, though I agree entirely that her lengthy statement was slanted. unprofessional and stupid. She’s not who Republicans should use to vet our GOP nominee.
You win for dumbest person on this forum.
Here’s another interview with Rand responding to unfair questions:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qS7nqwGt4-I
Also, there’s a new campaign out called “Women for Rand”:
http://twitter.com/EvanMcSan/status/585819143217270784/photo/1
HOADM– really now? Justifying MSM bias? Let’s recall several instances. After the. Benghazi tragedy, in which transparent lies were adduced on every Sunday talk show, BO had his word. Amidst several pages praising Islam, understanding why Libyans would be upset, endlessly blaming and decrying an obscure video that one millionth of 1% of US citizens were aware of, he threw in a passing sentence in the middle of it all: we don’t condone terrorism, a point belying his overall tone and belying the ruse.
This was a point in the prez debates in which Romney sought to highlight the Benghazi failure as denying terrorism. Ta da: moderator Candy Crowley helped out BO, “yes, he did mention terrorism,” thoroughly obliterating Romney’s valid point.
Out of the blue, in a debate, George Clinton White House Stephanopolous asked Romney if he would support a state law guaranteeing religious requirements. Huh? It was not an issue, Romney, puzzled, said it was not and knew of such pending proposals.. The purposeful Steph aggressively pushed, Yes or no, and thus the manipulation by biased media to contrive stories and to fan the dying sparks on the spurious, contrived “war on. women” on life support afterits transparent bunk-filled failure in the 2014 election may again have new life.
Put it in perspective.
Poor Romney. You believe that he was tricked by a newsreader. Maybe the republicans would appear more favorably if they just stuck to being interviewed by Hannity or Doucey over at Fox.
What nonsense. This is much ado about nothing- a lib newscaster (who generally gets paid to read news, not investigate or report) and a politician talking over each other during a remote interview. Wow, you never see that…
As a papoose, TBG remembers the elders in his tribe saying of GOP candidates, “They know better. They’re just saying that to get elected. After they’re elected they’ll do the right thing.”
Either Rand Paul is 1) A typical big government war-mongering Neo-con or 2)He’s pretending to be “mainstream” but will revert to his Dad’s libertarianism if elected.
TBG will probably vote for him in hopes that it’s the second.
*There’s no fool like an old fool.*
Francisco d’Anconia ain’t happening friend…
He looks a little pill-ed up to me.
He’s a stereotypically egomaniacal physician-as-god surgeon. The press needs to keep that in mind.
Rand needs to keep in mind that there was always serious talk that John McCain was not temperamentally fit to be president, i. e., too unstable. That might stick to Rand if he keeps throwing fits. On, the other hand, it describes about half of the GOP 2016 clown car.
Paul isn’t running for president. like his dad, he’s running for a lifelong position sucking money from the pockets of ‘conservative’ boobs and rubes. a lot like half the ‘conservatives’ in american politics, media, churches…
With his frat boy, “how dare you” demeanor, who could seriously imagine Rand Paul in any world tense situation warranting a cool head and diplomacy?
It was a great interview in that it revealed Rand is clearly, not presidential material.
Thanks Rand!