Department Of Homeland Security: What’s It Good For?

CONGRESS SHOULD SHUT DOWN AGENCY … FOR GOOD

|| By RON PAUL  ||  Late Friday night, Congress passed legislation funding the Department of Homeland Security for one week.  This vote followed weeks of debate over efforts to attach a prohibition on funding President Barack Obama’s executive order granting amnesty to certain illegal immigrants to the Homeland Security funding bill.

Despite the heated rhetoric from both sides, no one seriously believes that Congress will allow Homeland Security funding to lapse.  Most in Congress believe that, without the Department of Homeland Security, Americans would be left unprotected from terrorists and natural disasters.  As with most areas of bipartisan agreement, the truth is the exact opposite of the DC consensus.  The American people would be much better off if Congress transferred the few constitutional functions performed by Homeland Security to other parts of the government and then shut down the rest of the department.

Many Americans associate Homeland Security with the color–coded terrorist warning system and the “if you see something, say something” public relations campaign. These programs were designed to inspire public confidence in the department, but instead they inspired public ridicule.

Ironically, the best case for shutting down this department is its most well-known component — the Transportation Security Administration (TSA).  More terrorist attacks have been thwarted by airline passengers than by the TSA!  The TSA may be ineffective at stopping terrorists, but it is very effective at harassing innocent Americans like Lucy Forck.  Three-year-old Lucy, who uses a wheelchair, not only had to endure an intrusive screening from TSA agents, but the agents also took away her beloved stuffed animal.

When not abusing children who use wheelchairs, TSA subjects airline passengers to rules that seem designed to make air travel as unpleasant as possible. For example, TSA recently forced a Campaign for Liberty staffer to throw away a jar of Nutella she had in her carry-own luggage.  I am sure all airline passengers feel safe knowing that TSA is protecting them from sandwich spreads.

Ending the TSA would return responsibility for airline security to airports and airlines.  Private businesses have a greater incentive than a government bureaucracy to ensure their customers’ safety.  Those conservatives who think this is a radical idea should try to think of one area where they trust government bureaucrats to do a better job than private business owners.

Another agency within Homeland Security that the American people could do without is the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).  Having spent fifteen years in Congress representing a coastal area subject to hurricanes and floods, I have seen first-hand how FEMA places adherence to bureaucratic rules ahead of aiding victims of a natural disaster.  As a result, it is not uncommon for disaster victims to wait months or even years for assistance.

FEMA not only fails to provide effective relief to disaster victims, it also impedes private disaster relief efforts.  FEMA even hinders disaster victims’ efforts to help themselves.  While in Congress, I heard stories of individuals being threatened with fines or even jail time if they returned to their property without FEMA’s permission.  One individual in my district was threatened with arrest if he removed a tarp that FEMA put on his house — even though FEMA was supposed to have put it on his neighbor’s house!

Ten years after the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, it is clear that this department has failed to protect our security, but has infringed on liberty.  If Congress really wanted to enhance our security and our liberty it would shut down this unnecessary, unconstitutional department.

Ron Paul is a former U.S. Congressman from Texas and the leader of the pro-liberty, pro-free market movement in the United States. His weekly column – reprinted with permission – can be found here.