James Metts Plea Agreement: No Dice!
FINALLY! A JUDGE WITH SOME COJONES … By FITSNEWS || In a stunning setback for both disgraced LYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
FINALLY! A JUDGE WITH SOME COJONES … By FITSNEWS || In a stunning setback for both disgraced LYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
55 comments
Jimmy better learn the Honkey Pokey.
In the lowcountry they refer to is as – let’s play Pokey the Honkey
12-16 months? Still not a bad deal if you are Metts.
That is 12-19 per count…10 counts. Of course he won’t serve 10 counts x 12-19. In my opinion, it would be appropriate 120-190 months!
He is in a pickle. He has already agreed and plead guilty! How will he now plead not guilty?
Hope he gets the ten years and it will send a message.
He still has the illegal gambling hanging.
So long frog face. Take all of your buds with you!
Damn
Message to all – there is one Federal Judge who doesn’t like Cockroaches
Scurry you little sons of bitches, scurry like hell is your co-pilot
Man, maybe he should have just agreed to be charged with the gambling thing. Seems the Judge ain’t happy with harboring illegals.
There is justice after all.
Maybe. No trial or sentence yet.
Exactly, for all we know this is simply a show to stop the little people from breaking out their pitchforks.
It could be like the DA in the Ferguson GJ, leading the defendant with all the right questions to get all the right answers while the judge instructs to the jury on how to find the defendant innocent.
How do you force a prosecutor sympathetic to law enforcement to put on a good trial? lol…you can’t….attorney’s hide behind the sanctity of “impartiality” and “bar ethics” all the time, with a wink & a nod.
Serious Lexington County scum there… riding that nice “Dutch Forker” last name to victory, time and time again; meanwhile, playing the traitor role by profiting from the illicit immigration trade that is ruining this nation in general, and this county specifically. Of course, those old white haired Lutherans that put him in office preach regularly against the illegals… but anyway. As a final point though, I’d still like for someone to follow the illegal immigration trade to the big money makers/political donors of the county, such as the well known homebuilder/developer that pretty much owns the Lexington District 5 school board, amongst other political bodies…
Not just Lexington 5 school board, but also Lexington County Council, Irmo and Chapin as well. They are all beholden to him, his trade group and his scumbag trash removal cronies. They are the real cockroaches in Lexington. Wait, aren’t these the same goons that tried to buy a penny tax in Lexington county for their foolish projects?
Metts is a Republican and, as such, I’m sure he fully supports the strongest enforcement of laws concerning illegal immigrants — no deals, no special privileges, no coddling of criminals. Throw the book at them. Right?
Right, just like they did with those Democratic Governors in Illinois. You see, it doesn’t make any difference if you’re and “R” or “D” when it comes to corruption, throw the book at *all* of them.
That’s my opinion too. How ’bout the Love Guv next?
Is she under indictment, if and when that happens and if she is found guilty, throw away the key.
Hopefully …. NEXT UP OHALEY!!!
Shouldn’t there be a new prosecutor? Obviously, Nettles isn’t taking the case seriously.
Good point.
Exactly!
You mean Metts may in fact be headed for the big house? It’s a Christmas miracle!
One could only hope! Please! Please! Please! Please! Please!
Let him grab those bars from the other side.
Other than mortgage fraud cases that revealed to anyone who read about them exactly how the housing bubble came about, has Nettles’ office done much of anything?
It’s good to see a judge stand up to a bad deal. Too bad Thomas Ravenel’s didn’t and gave him slap on the wrist time.
Nettles has done a good job of protecting Jean Toal, if that counts.
Pray tell, what does Jean Toal have to do with the federal cases Nettles’ office has been handling?
Do you think she has broken a federal law?
Guess you don’t know them very well and don’t read posts on this site often. Jean was tight as a tick with Jakie Knotts and Jahue Moore. Still is, really.
Are you saying she is a co-conspirator with Jake on the illegals or gambling cases?
Yeah, how’s thar been working out in the City of Columbia or South Congaree? Of course, when the voters are bat shit stupid as they appear to be in Lexington, Richland, and Newberry counties, among others, you do get corrupt dreck being re-elected over and over, again. At least term limits prevent these jobs-for-life by scumbags like Jimmy.
Here’s my completely uneducated and biased view of the latest development.
The feds have plenty on this crook, and the judge thinks they have plenty on the rest of the crooks.
Ergo, no deals are needed to put the whole lot of them in the slammer.
It’s my dream and I’m sticking to it!
I believe it’s called “the sugars”
To underscore the rampant corruption among many of our Sheriffs, an article on another site (WIS?) was telling how a spokesman for the SC Sheriff’s aasociation was speaking out against term limits for Sheriffs in SC. He blathered on about all the “good” things Metts has done for SC Law Enforcement since taking office decades ago. (I guess to include how much bribe money and other graft he has served himself with while “serving” us.
After 12 years or maybe less, they usually become so full of hubris, self importance, and corruption, they are only of use to themselves and no one else. We need term limits for Sheriffs, NOW!
Are you paying attention, Leon?
Sheriffs need to be hired by county government administrators in a merit based system, not elected.
We do not need more politics in the criminal justice system than is already there.
I feel the same way about solicitors.
Where a few people in power decide merit. You are wrong. Good or bad, unless the elections were rigged, the Sheriff was elected by the people.
It doesn’t matter what kind of system is created, these kinds of people will find a way to corrupt it.
What I don’t understand is why after 2 years of investigating this by the feds did the prosecutor agree to a plea deal? I have always heard that if the fed brings up charges they pretty much have a slam dunk. Why waste tax payer’s money like that?
How is taxpayer money being wasted with a plea deal?
If a prosecutor can get someone to cop a plea, that frees up a lot of court time, which would seem to mean money and court time is saved for other cases not so easily resolved.
Uh all the time like 2 years they spent investigating JM.
All they got is: Mett’s might have harbored Mexican illegals.
OK, if that’s a crime. Then the Federal Government should charge every single law enforcement agency in America: too. As, the FEDs have been actively doing the exact same thing. In fact, even President Obama just said not to send them back.
Like it or not: Metts is probably not guilty of anything at all.
Unless, they can positively prove, beyond a shadow of doubt, that he took bribes to do it. And, that is far from proven. Which explains the plea deal. The Prosecutor knows he’s likely to lose the case.
Which of Jimmy’s associates are you? Apparently Jimmy and his attorney thougjt the case the Feds have was strong enough that they were eager to accept a plea deal. I hope he pays dearly for the decades of evil he has done and for tarnishing his badge of office for the sake of personal gain and greed.
If the Feds know what a couple people I know who ran with the Lexington Mafia know, it’ll be an open and shut case. Through reliable sources I’ve been told there’s evidence that goes back decades for some of the charges.
Think about it from the other side.
Why would a prosecutor give such an easy sentence.
When Metts should be going to jail.
Answer: his case is very weak.
Metts probably took the deal because it was a give away for him.
He gets no time, no money, and freedom.
He is going to retire anyway.
So, he walks.
Otherwise, he risks jail, and his only gain is his reputation, which is already soiled, and his old job back if he wants to run for it again, which he probably doesn’t want to do anyway.
Now do you see why??
You do understand how justice works in SC don’t you? If you’re part of the good ol’ boy network you get 3 years probation regardless of what crime you’re pleading guilty to.
Whether the case is weak or not, I guess we’ll find out in court. Unless Jimmy decides to plead guilty to all charges.
Some is wrong … Although case law tells us that a sitting judge does not have to accept a plea deal, it is very rare for one NOT to when it has been worked out between the prosecutor and defendant. Is Nettle’s under watch from his superiors at the DOJ? Something is obviously very much so WRONG here. Yes sire, this is very odd, in deed.
It would be nice to know that the DC folks are finally starting to wonder why Nettles has been doing nothing with the SC political corruption crap that has been coming down since the side show of Nikki’s everybody-else-is-doing-it defense at her ethics committee love fest.
Why he didn’t jump in with both feet then is incomprehensible.
Nettles agreeing to a plea deal to 3 years probation when sentencing guild lines are clear that there is mandatory time behind bars???? WTF is wrong here, people. Is Nettles corrupt too? Sure seems like it. Nettles knows the statutes. Nettles knows what they say. But he tries to pull a dirty trick off with a federal judge???? WOW!!!!!! Nettles has been exposed!!!!!!!!
“guidelines called for a prison sentence of anywhere between 12-16 months”
Are you calling me corrupt? Wait. Let me call Aunt Jean (Toal) and ask her if she can do something to you for saying that.
Is it possible Nettles is a beneficiary of some of the loot Metts is accused of taking?
Here is my best guess.
Metts now knows that if he is found guilty he will get time within the advisory guideline range. That would probably be something like up to 5 years if he goes to trial and is convicted on multiple counts.
He can instead choose to plead guilty “straight up” and get at least a 2 or 3 point reduction in sentencing points to keep him in the 12-16 month range quoted by the judge.
My guess is that he doesn’t go to trial but instead takes that option. Judge gives him one year “and a day”.
Pitiful. We put a young man with a roach, in his possession, away for longer than that.
I had an….uhhh…. unpleasant encounter with Jimmy,years ago,but now I’m gloating,and downright smug.Even so,his crimes pale in comparison to that guy in Richland county.Can karma strike twice? I sure hope so.
Were you pole smoking down at the boat ramp again?
Close
The deal that has been struck includes this red herring. Everyone is celebrating but what will most likely happen (remember Lugwig and the Masserati murder charge) is that they will put up a weak case, i.e. sandbag, and jury will find Metts not guilty and he goes away clean. Even better than probation and no cage time.
In SC vs. Ludwig everyone in their right mind knew Arial could not prove murder but manslaughter was a slam dunk. Verdict was non guilty.
absolute power corrupts absolutely.
For your reading enjoyment:
http://www.thestate.com/2014/12/19/3884026_metts-name-slated-to-disappear.html?sp=/99/205/&rh=1
Just say “NO” to Jim Crawford. He is buddies with severely ethically challenged former CPD Chief and Lott Family member, Ruben Santiago. Word on the street has it that Crawford has promised Santiago a position of prominence in his department if he is elected as Sheriff. Given the shit LexCo has been through with Jimmy for the last few decades, do we really need this?