Ron Paul: US House Wants A New “Cold War” With Russia
HYPOCRITICAL RESOLUTION LIKELY TO CAUSE “UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES” By RON PAUL || Last weYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
HYPOCRITICAL RESOLUTION LIKELY TO CAUSE “UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES”
By RON PAUL || Last we
9 comments
When you google search and only find opposition from Ron Paul, Alex Jones and Russian media, l wonder why bother with this comment.
They are Republicans. They are always planning for the next war. They have to justify cutting butter to buy guns.
Obama’s done a good job of helping them out though.
Did you not read the article? All but 5 Democrats voted for the resolution.
The planning I am referring to is the plan to get more money for defense contracts we don’t need. We are not about to go to war with Russia. They have nothing we want that would be worth fighting a nuclear power for. But if we can make people think we are, that means we need a hell of a lot more money for defense.
We are not going to war with Russia, but are we giving our allies confidence that we will meet out treaty obligations? Many military expenditures are made in the hope they will prevent war by discouraging any enemy.
The sanctions against Russia and support of Ukraine is an effort to raise the price for Russia’s provocative actions. They have been engaged in air force incursions of NATO airspace and a submarine off of Sweden’s coast. If Russia believes that they can act with impunity, then their next target will be the Baltic states. They are testing us. Follow Paul’s policies and Russia would interpret it as a green light and our allies would knuckle under to Russian intimidation. It’s not just Ukraine and Syria. Putin has made his ambitions very clear to restore Russian hegemony in eastern Europe.
Where’s the Lowe’s Bowl? Or the two uninvited teams are whack UAB is high and dry, better teams never played a game.
Women are better looking when you post an a** by their face.
Warn them in authority over you do the right thing.