SC Judge Balks At Gay Marriage Ruling
DAN ECKSTROM DEFIES – THEN ACCEPTS – SUPREME COURT RULING By FITSNEWS || A probate courtYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
DAN ECKSTROM DEFIES – THEN ACCEPTS – SUPREME COURT RULING By FITSNEWS || A probate courtYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
21 comments
You can’t make this stuff up. Wait! Yes you can. In SC.
Talk of secession will be next.
There’s always talk, i wanna see the Feds take them up on their offer.
SC is only good for ‘talk’. Too bad it’s hard for other English speakers to understand.
This is what I’ve been thinking about.I need to keep an eye over my shoulder,and that’s just for some in-laws,and other relatives.
The sun will come out, tomorrow, bet your bottom dollar that tomorrow, there’ll be queers, walking along, the Main Street, skipping over to the courthouse, Tomorrow, Tomorrow – in Lexin’ton, tomorrow – the queers are a day away…….
“Do you Bubba, take Jimbo to be your lawfully wedded husband, your cuddle muffin redneck, to have and to hold……”
Linsey has been fucking his lover for decades, please !
Uniting, conceiving, and raising a family begins with a man and woman. Their pairing is what brought about boundaries for intercourse, reproduction, and family benefiting all and favoring the continuation of humanity and society.
Marriage is the union established in response to these social needs. As such, marriage has absolutely nothing to do with same gender unions. Forcing society to accept a new definition of marriage that disregards this natural order by making men and women interchangeable in it, diminishes our appreciation and understanding of marriage. It diminishes the differences between men and women and the complimentary union of those differences essential to family and society.
That same gender couples had no part in the establishing of marriage means marriage is not just the union of two people who romantically love each other, but the union of a man and woman. SSU and marriage are far, far too different on too many levels to ever be honestly, fairly or reasonably considered the same.
Society has long regarded the differences between men and women, and our laws
reflect the respect society has for those differences in many areas without any resulting inequality (restroom, dorms, dressing rooms, clubs, organizations, schools). Those differences are of great importance and a union exclusive to men and women which recognizes the benefits to society and the significance of respectfully uniting those differences, in no way illegally discriminates.
Thank you so much H G you narrow minded and bigoted idiot. It’s the 21st century, not the age of slavery. Oh I know South Carolina will suceed and the south shall rise again. Idiots like you will reelect the likes of Sanford, Haley, Scott, Graham, Wilson, Duncan, Gowdy and all the other mental midgets.
So anyone who disagrees with you is suddenly painted a bigot…well…you must be a bigot yourself for not appreciating a divergent opinion…bigot!
Racial segregation is also a “divergent opinion.”
So is anti Semitism.
I presume then ,in your world, people who hold such views are not “bigots.”
Accordingly,really,there is no such thing as “bigotry.”
Correct?
Whoops. H G your last paragraph regarding the difference between men and women, and your laws. Looks like it was taken out of the pages of Jim Crow aka segregation????? My how far you come and grown.
Perversion, violence and hatred are still being promoted by many (i.e. Hollywood) and gradually being accepted by the people.
Perversion, violence and hatred are still being promoted by many (i.e. Republicans) and gradually being accepted by the people.
There. Fixed it for you.
Just to set the record straight on a few points: I believe Judge Eckstrom refused to issue gay marriage licenses UNTIL the Supreme Court ruled on it. Once they ruled on it, he then said he would issue the licenses. So at no time was he defying SupCo.
(Also, not sure about this but don’t believe he’s related to Richard Eckstrom. LexCo is crawling with Eckstroms, it doesn’t mean they’re related.)
Nope. He issued his statement after the Supreme Court denied the stay.
Dan Eckstrom is a moron. Thank goodness he has an associate judge; she knows the law, unlike him.
Secession just because law-abiding, taxpaying Gay couples are allowed to marry? That seems like a BIT of an overreaction.
Simple….throw his ass in jail for contempt of Court
That’s all good and well to say that the government shouldn’t be involved in marriages, but the reason the government got involved in marriages in the first place was because religionist men were marrying child brides, and taking more than one bride. The government became involved as a regulatory function, a role it still plays.