TALES OF A DEPRAVED CYBERCRAT …
Want another disturbing commentary on the sort of people who are running this country? Meet Timothy DeFoggi, who until January of this year was the acting cybersecurity chief of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS).
Yeah … that’s the agency that bombed the implementation of the Obamacare website (which was once famously described as a “hacker’s wet dream”).
Anyway, DeFoggi was convicted this week in Nebraska on charges of conspiracy to solicit and distributed child pornography – including videos and images of infants and toddlers being sexually abused.
That’s right … infants and toddlers.
According to prosecutors, DeFoggi – who used screen names including “f*ckchrist” and “PTassEater” – actively solicited child porn from other pedophiles and engaged in chats with them, chats that included discussions of raping, beating and even murdering these infants and toddlers.
“DeFoggi even suggested meeting one member in person to fulfill their mutual fantasies to violently rape and murder children,” prosecutors wrote in charging the 56-year-old from Germantown, Maryland.
Astoundingly, this guy still had top secret government clearance for months after his May 2013 arrest …
DeFoggi apparently thought his online depravity was secure because he used sites that shielded user activities via “anonymizing networks.” According to the website Wired , users who engage these networks have proven difficult to “unmask.”
“The traffic of users is encrypted and bounced through a network of computers hosted by volunteers around the world before it arrives at its destination, thus masking the IP address from which the visitor originates,” the website explained.
Sheesh …
Listen: This website is all about individual liberty. We believe people should be allowed – for the most part – to indulge their perversions as they see fit. But there are two critical caveats to that policy – both of which hinge on the notion of competing liberties. First, the activity in question must be consensual. And second, the individuals doing the consenting must be adults .
Child pornographers – and those who download, distribute or purchase their content – are violating both of those caveats, to say nothing of the liberties of those who deserve our protection the most.
People like DeFoggi – who received numerous awards and commendations from the government – do not deserve to receive taxpayer-subsidized accommodations in the wake of their crimes.
People like him are rabid animals who need to be put down …
RAPID REACTION
@fitsnews one would think he'd know how to mask his ip's. This is like hitting two birds with one stone
— Greg Micheals (@edmontongreg) August 29, 2014
20 comments
I thought Liberal-Tarians promoted porn????…What gives???
Perhaps you missed the entire portion of this article that explained the condition precedent for type of behavior.
Also, I’ve been curious, what is the purpose behind capitalizing the “T” in “Tarians?”
Good questions. Timing on articles by Fits? Don’t they always say the “smeller is the feller” and a “fox smells his own hole first”?
Millennial parents are purveyors of pornography. Who in their right mind would give a kid a cell phone or laptop with wi-fi?
22% who have sent or posted nude or semi-nude pictures or video of themselves: 22% of teen girls; 11% of girls ages 13-16
The percent of teenagers sending or posting sexually suggestive messages: 37% of teen girls
71% of teen girls who have sent or posted sexually suggestive content say they have sent or posted this content to a boyfriend or girlfriend.
21% of teenage girls say they have sent sexually suggestive content content to someone they wanted to date or hook up with.
51%of teen girls say pressure from a guy is a reason girls send sexy messages or images;
52% of teenage girls used sexting as a “sexy present” for their boyfriend.
40% of teenage girls said they sent sexually suggestive messages or images as “a joke.”
34% of teen girls say they sent or posted sexually suggestive content to “feel sexy.”
12% of teen girls felt “pressured” to send sexually suggestive messages or images
38% of all online girls have reported experiencing some type of harassment
30 percent of teenage girls polled by the Girl Scout Research Institute said they had been sexually harassed in a chatroom. Only 7 percent, however, told their mothers or fathers about the harassment because they were worried that their parents would ban them from going online”
84% of girls have long text exchanges on personal matters
How many young adults are sending or posting nude or seminude images of themselves? 36% of young adult women
How many teens are sending or posting sexually suggestive messages? 37% of all teen girls; 56% of young adult women (teen 13-19, YA woman 20-26)
42% of kids have been bullied while online. 1 in 4 have had it happen more than once.
35% of kids have been threatened online. Nearly 1 in 5 have had it happen more than once.
21% of kids have received mean or threatening e-mail or other messages.
58% of kids admit someone has said mean or hurtful things to them online. More than 4 out of 10 say it has happened more than once.
53% of kids admit having said something mean or hurtful to another person online. More than 1 in 3 have done it more than once.
58% have not told their parents or an adult about something mean or hurtful that happened to them online.
Only 15% of parents are “in the know” about their kids’ social networking habits, and how these behaviors can lead to cyberbullying.
The percent of teenagers who have sent or posted nude or semi-nude pictures or video of themselves:
20% of teenagers overall
22% of teen girls
18% of teen boys
11% of teen girls ages 13-16
The percent of teenagers sending or posting sexually suggestive messages:
39% of all teenagers
37% of teen girls
40% of teen boys
44% of both teen girls and teen boys say it is common for sexually suggestivetext messages to get shared with people other than the intended recipient.
36% of teen girls and 39 % of teen boys say it is common for nude or semi-nudephotos to get shared with people other than the intended recipient.
75% of teens and 71% of young adults say sending sexually suggestive content “can have serious negative consequences.”
39% of teens and 59% of young adults have sentor posted sexually suggestive emails or text messages
20% of teens and 33% of young adults havesent/posted nude or semi-nude images of themselves.
23% of teen girls and 24% of teen boys say they were pressured by friends to send or post sexual content.
32% of online teens have experience one of the following forms of harassment:
15% of teens reported having private material forwarded w/o permission
13% had received threatening messages
13% said someone had spread a rumor about them online
6% had someone post an embarrassing picture of them online w/o permission
26% of teens have been harassed via their cell phone
4% of 12 year olds have sent or received a sext
16 percent of teens considered meeting someone they’ve only talked to online and 8percent have actually met someone they only knew online
48 percent of K-1st reported viewing online content that made them feel uncomfortable,of which 72 percent reported the experience to a grownup, meaning that one in four children did not.
32 percent of teens clear the browser history to hide what they do online from their parents.
52 percent of teens have given out personal information online to someone they don’t knowoffline including personal photos and/or physical descriptions of themselves (24 percent).Double the number of teen girls have shared photos or physical descriptions of themselves online as boys.
Almost one in eight youth ages 8-18 discovered that someone they were communicating with online was an adult pretending to be much younger
48 percent of mothers admitted they don’t always know what their kids do online.
In at least four states, sexting kids are facing charges of child pornography and sexual exploitation of a minor.
Many on government computers are known to access porn. They have done it (and likely still do) at SCDOT, as some of the engineers there had once told me. But for someone to stoop so low as to want to see child pornographer, that takes the entire matter really deep into the dark side of porn addiction that is clearly connected to pedophilia.
The Obama administration surely is infested with criminals of all kinds, is it not? Makes me wonder more now, why Senator Graham leads a secret personal life. We see his face in the news often, we hear his babbling rants, but we really know absolutely nothing much about his personal life outside of politics. My sixth sense is telling me, there is something deep he keeps hidden.
Graham is attracked to female midgets. No harm in that, but wouldn’t you want to keep that private?
“Obama administration surely is infested with criminals of all kinds”
Don’t go just half way, accuse it of harboring vampires, zombies, and the lycanthropic too.
I hope they cut his dick off in prison.
It’d be a waste of a good government employed pedo with clearance. Imagine the mayhem if we dropped him behind borders in Russia and gave him vodka jello shots, a Russian cover and access to the Kremlin nursery.
Still ok by Elliot Holder…
I find it interesting that DeFoggi’s screen name indicates anti-religious views. There seems to be a religious component to child sexual abuse. Many of the abusers are religious figures or connected to cults. Warren Jeffs was head of the FLDS Church. There has been an ongoing scandal inside the Catholic Church. Churches often provide perfect cover for the abuser. Many religious institutions are more concerned with protecting the institution than the children.
There are also perpetrators who have anti-religious views.They worship Satan or the Anti-Christ . Often they are atheist and yet the pornography produced will have a ritual or religious theme. It is as if they are trying to prove that there is no God. They abuse a child in such a heinous ways that surely if there was a God then he would intervene to protect this child. Other abusers think that they are somehow helping the child, even spiritually.
A religious believer or an atheist can both be psychologically healthy but child sexual abusers will often also have obsessive, deviant or hostile religious views and practices. Of course not everyone with obsessive, deviant or hostile religious views will be abusers but they often exhibit other psychological or behavioral problems. I am carefulabout my interaction with them, even on this website.
Judged by the news, right after priests would come protestant Ministers to Youth, and Ministers of Music, and such, assistant pastors in big churches with direct access to lots of young people.
Come on now, Mr. Wil Folks. You do know what an IT Systems Administrator does….don’t you..?!
What is NOT being divulged is how long an administrator allowed this guy to access certain sites without confronting the issue in a more timely fashion. Yearly training is required to refresh and remind personnel of their duties.
Anytime an article such as this surfaces with no mention of an IT Administrators NAME…..a careful review of office “politics” is required….!!
DeFoggi apparently thought his online depravity was secure because he used sites that shielded user activities via “anonymizing networks.” According to the website Wired , users who engage these networks have proven difficult to “unmask.”
“The traffic of users is encrypted and bounced through a network of computers hosted by volunteers around the world before it arrives at its destination, thus masking the IP address from which the visitor originates,” the website explained.
——–
The FBI, NSA, and CIA are sitting like cats at a mouse hole with man-in-the-middle attacks on your encryption – waiting for you to visit sites that offer proxies. Man-in-the-middle makes NSA-proof encryption transparent.
———-FBI ——– PROXY ———- FBI——— = ——FBI——–
They don’t bother with the small shit like p2p users, but if you’re on the gov’t payroll, you’re dead meat. If they blow their cover by rousting the pirate bay or the dark net, they won’t be as effective, as they are now… playing black op cowboy.. getting information illegally, so they can pretend to stumble over it legally.
Be little people.
Bouncing around through other people’s systems – making their notebooks, tablets, whatever, into zombies and the like. There are so many infected systems out there, take your pick – if you know how. The Feds do the same thing in ops. And forget about programs like “do not track” … you hit a fed government website, they put something different on your system other than a tracking cookie. Its like a fingerprint. You can’t so easily get rid of it, much less find it. But that is all about to change.
Oh, sure you can find it. If you look.
No packet shall pass.
What?
No packet shall pass.
Who are you?
The sniffer at the bridge… WHAT… is your favorite IP?
Listen: This website is all about individual liberty.
——–
let’s have the porn back, libbie!
Smokey Robinson and TBG second that emotion.
I’ll bet he wishes he had a photographic memory right about now.
Probably an Obama appointee.