Boeing “Nightmare” Liner Horror Stories
“WE WILL NOT BE FLYING ON THAT PLANE AGAIN” A Boeing Dreamliner traveling over the AtlanYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
“WE WILL NOT BE FLYING ON THAT PLANE AGAIN” A Boeing Dreamliner traveling over the AtlanYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
19 comments
Question of the day:
Would you rather ride on a liquorcycle in downtown Columbia during rush hour or a one engined Dreamliner over the ocean?
Depends. Could I go against the norm and wear clothing in a color that might actually be visible to the drivers in caged vehicles?
So this was an (not Boeing) engine problem, not a problem with the actual aircraft (that Boeing builds)? Any details on what caused the (not Boeing) engine to become inoperative? Was it because of something Boeing (the builder of the aircraft) screwed up, or some problem with the (not Boeing) engine that is built by a (not Boeing) jet engine builder company (not Boeing)?
harness wiring and equipment installed at North Charleston.
But assembled into “plug and play” units at another contractor.
Being it was a UK based airline I’d be willing to bet the engines were Rolls Royce engines, not only not Boeing but not US made engines. GE and Rolls Royce both make engines for the 787 and most of the British airlines opt for the Rolls Royce engines when available.
That all being said, I am not a huge fan of twin-engine trans-oceanic flights, the old 747, DC-10 and MD-11s just feel safer for those operations.
Thomson 787s are powered by GE engines not Rolls.
I fly the Boeing 777 in my X-Plane 10.2 Global Home Version. I can tell you, it floats like a feather landing at Charleston International and charges balls to the walls taking off from Columbia Metro. The 36,000 foot cruising altitude keeps me above those real weather grabs off the net! I think I will by the 787 download this weekend! You suck jet fuel, Fits.
Engine problem is not the same as aairframe problem. The fact that they were able to land safely is a testim to the aircraft and air crew. As far as their treatment on the ground, you’re on a military base that you were not scheduled or cleared to be at, don’t expect a welcome mat.
The ordeal continued after an emergency landing at an American military base in The Azores, as passengers were surrounded by armed guards and forced to stay on the tarmac for more than five hours.
Five hours stuck in a plane at the airport?
Welcome to America!
Once again Sic Willie regales us with his aeronautical engineering expertise. The plane performed as designed, i.e. continued to fly on one engine. So, master engineer Sic Willie, whose engine was it that failed? GE or Rolls?
You’re full of it, as usual.
Full of what? CNSYD asked a valid question. What is your point if any?
Now I’m convinced. The mysterious group of bloggers at fitsnews known only as “We” are smarter than all the people who run Boeing.
Fabio and Nunzio rent a private plane for the day and are
doing fine until it’s time for touchdown. Fabio is busy with all the instrument readings and finally gets the plane down, but has to screech to a stop. “Boy, that’s a short runway,” he says, wiping his forehead. “Yes,” agrees Nunzio, “but look how wide it is.”
What a joke Will- do you own Airbus stock? (the Airbus whose stock has been in the tank since January)
A GE engine causes a plane to make an emergency landing which it makes successfully and that’s an indictment of Boeing in SC? The 747, arguably the most important innovation in passenger air movement took a long time to get right, had numerous problems and 44 years later is still “hauling it all”. New plane take time to work out – at least it isn’t falling out of the sky like the De Havilland Comet.
Stick to politics and local interest – you appear to actually know something about that and generally have something interesting to say.
Gettin’ to the point that when I get on a plane I want to know if it was made in SC. If it was – I want off.
I don’t know the rank amateur who wrote this “news” article, but he so clearly shows his biases that he fails even to understand that plane manufacturers and the entities that build their engines are completely separate. Writings of this subterranean level are typically read on high school bathroom walls. What a hack.
Plastic planes are a bad idea.