House Democratic Leader Proposes Coastal Casinos
BUT THERE’S A CATCH … S.C. House minority leader Todd Rutherford (D-Columbia) is introYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
BUT THERE’S A CATCH …
S.C. House minority leader Todd Rutherford (D-Columbia) is intro
34 comments
Don’t the democrats want to “Take a Toke for the Kids” too. Sell pot to fund schools..LMAO…”Buy a lid for the Kids”…You can’t make this S#!t up…Hahahaha…”Mary Jane, to fund Dick and Jane”….Hahaha…
A lack of vice, ain’t the problem, Dumb@$$…. And democrat answers have proven to be pretty F*#kin’ stupid too…(see education, the economy and healthcare)….IOW: No thanks..
Getting lonely over at the companion site are you? You will never build a business by farting around over here all day.
Dumbfounded, again…aren’t you Dumb@$$…???
His site is on blogspot, even if he had the traffic he couldn’t monetize it.
Not a marketing major are you?…ever hear of AdSense???…That’s a Google product (Gadget) for Blogspot, you Dumb@$$….
I LOVE scaring the F*#k out of you Brown Shirts…You are finta’ S#!* all over yourselves when you see what is coming…LMAO…..
And oh yeah: Great approach to the Gambling story here (link below.) on SC Political Digest.
http://scdigest.blogspot.com/
Better a brown shirt than a brown short, eh Big T?
AdSense. Woo Hoo! That’s not a true monetizing plan in and of itself. You’re not as bright as you advertise yourself to be, obviously.
Yes it is Dumb@$$ a monetizing device. But I did not say it was the only one, but that it can be used on Blogspot….and I did not say I’m even planning on using it. You seem as scared as these other Gestapos…LMAO…you should be…
Hey Tango ! What was Rush’s statement of the day ?
He said you’re a douche bag.
I’m only scared that you might still be capable of procreation.
If he could advertise himself as bright, he wouldn’t have to advertise in the comments here.
Heck, it would take godlike marketing skills to advertise him as bright. He could own his own firm with that kind of talent.
You’re not as bright as you advertise yourself to be, obviously.
Understatement of 2014, right there.
I assume you mean your brother Brown Shirts are worried you will make them look bad. As I recall the Brown Shirts and Nazis were Anti-union, Anti-communist, Anti- gay, Anti-minority, Anti-immigration, Corporatist. Sounds a lot like the KKK, the Aryan Nation, Tea Party, and Republican Party to me.
You liberals are immersed in so much myth, that your puppet masters feed you, to control you. Get cable and watch Smithsonian Channel every once and a while.
Hitler had no problem w/ homosexuals at first. He was like the Liberal-Tarians of today. One of Hitler’s top aides (no pun) was gay. But the homosexuals became so pre-occupied w/ humping and sucking each other (the danger when your sexual preference is your identity) it threatened the NAZI mission.
Also: Hitler had Stalin freed from prison to take down Russia from within with Communism. It worked. Stalin and Hitler were allies, until Hitler double-crossed Stalin, and Russia had to side w/ the winners, or be done in by the Socialists. Stalin immediately turned on us, after we bailed his sorry @$$ out. Just like a liberal…
And PS: Hitler was Anti-American…just like you, Obama and the democrat party.
Look at Emily, getting all Nazi on us.
You need a history lesson
AdSense? lol… And every ad blocking program blocks that by default. You aren’t becoming a YouTube partner, you are piddling away on a blog, one that nobody reads anyways.
Also, I thought this was someone else’s blog that just happened to write like you? Oops.
Enjoy your pocket change.
So tell us, if you’re bragging about traffic on your site, why hasn’t anyone of these many people posted a response to your articles?
Let us know when your hits on any give post reach double digits. We will then stage an online suicide watch for Sic.
Hey Boz: I BET YOU Mine is BIGGER than yours, already. Hahahaha….
What? Your wife??
In other words, go the h#ll away?
Yes, let’s build casinos to increase the politicians’ road fund, which gets funneled back to projects in their home districts and wherever their buddies own some land.
Other than the building of Casinos part, That’s been done for years in SC, ask BH. Are people of SC ” that stupid ” ?
The democrats always propose the bills for legal gambling because it is their constituents who desperately do not want it. The gambling community detests the thought of legalized competition and taxation of the earnings.
When proposed at the right time, such as when there is a ton of negative publicity around corruption associated with gambling, the bill always gets hammered, derided and defeated in a very public fashion.
Then business can continue as usual.
It was humorous to hear Danny Frazier on the famous video gaming recordings talking about how you can’t put this $#!* in the rich neighborhoods, but the poor love it will spend their whole check on it…
FITS and the liberals MUST count on the ignorant and stupid for political power. People w/ ethics or sense will tell them to get screwed.
——–without proposing a funding strategy.”———
This bill is funding strategy for both Dem’s and Rep’s campaign coffers.
Yep.
MUCH MUCH better Writng and thinking here (link Below.) This article Chides democrats for trying to find yet another way to get their hands on Tax receipts, for the Greedy government. ..using an already Trashed “Murder Beach” as the cash cow.
Great Read: http://scdigest.blogspot.com/
Maybe ol’ scarhead should just take a trip to Florida with his drinking buddy T-Bone.
This is a well written article. Good work.
SC Democrats killed casino gambling when they elected Toal who then brushed off the Catawbas. SC Democrats killed casino gambling when they elected Leatherman as Pro Tem. MB is the last place you want a casino.
You think Dems are the only ones who elected Toal?
A casino needs to be in Santee at I-95, right down the road from I-26 on the shores of Lake Marion. Make the gamblers have to buy gas to and from the casino, the length and breadth of SC in the absolute middle of the state.