Uncategorized

The Real War On Women

 A FRESH PERSPECTIVE …  We were recently turned on to Cathy Reisenwitz by a friend of ours … Reisenwitz is editor at Young Voices and chief blogger at Sex and the State. She’s a free market feminist, as near as we can tell, and an expert on Bitcoin and other crypto-currencies – which she (correctly)…

 A FRESH PERSPECTIVE … 

We were recently turned on to Cathy Reisenwitz by a friend of ours …

Reisenwitz is editor at Young Voices and chief blogger at Sex and the State. She’s a free market feminist, as near as we can tell, and an expert on Bitcoin and other crypto-currencies – which she (correctly) views as free market antidotes to the perpetually metastasizing malignancy of the federal government.

And yes, “perpetually metastasizing malignancy” was us trying to show off …

“She’s very young, but seems to be getting some attention in the libertarian community,” our friend said.

Indeed …

Anyway, as much as we’d love to focus on Reisenwitz’s crypto-currency views we were most impressed by her observations on the subject of feminism.

“Feminist issues are nearly always more nuanced than the left and the right make them out to be,” Reisenwitz recently told Coin Telegraph. “A good example is the gender wage gap. The left claims it results mostly or only from gender-based discrimination. The data indicates that’s not actually the case, once you correct for choices like hours worked, education, experience, etc. The right claims the gap is purely the result of women’s choices. But that’s not really correct, either.”

So … what is the real source of the gender wage gap?

Well, without making any sort of sweeping indictment Reisenwitz points to several problems emanating from government, “like the fact that immigration restrictions and regulations make childcare more expensive than college tuition in most states, or the fact that at the lower end of the income scale, female-dominated professions are more likely to require a license.”

Nice …

Also, the last time we checked the federal government was still paying women 87 percent as much as men.

“I want to demonstrate how the government itself is the war on women, and how the market can benefit everyone, women included,” she says.

Amen, sister …

(Banner via)

Related posts

Uncategorized

Woman is elected president of the world

John
Uncategorized

Man eats a hamburger from 1937

John
Uncategorized

Murdaugh Retrial Hearing: Interview With Bill Young

Will Folks

61 comments

GrandTango May 27, 2014 at 10:41 am

Just make sure you publicize Libertarians connections w/ radical feminists (read Ultra Liberals)…Some of you who call yourselves Libertarians (TBG) $#!* all over yourselves when I call you Liberal-Tarians, based on FITS’ teachings.

Here, FITS is attaching you to Liberalism, far more solidly, than even I have.

Told you….I can see around the corner….

Reply
junior justice May 27, 2014 at 11:30 am

“ping” — another one tossed into the bad peanut bucket

Reply
euwe max May 27, 2014 at 2:02 pm

Turkey neck!

Reply
Buz Martin May 27, 2014 at 5:17 pm

You can’t even see the shit on the end of your nose.

Reply
GrandTango May 27, 2014 at 5:31 pm

So Boz: You agree w/ this feminist. Don’t you run a whore hourse…errr…strip club???…

And you are part of that filth at the beach, full of tattoos, pierce parlors, gambling junkets and motorcycle murderers…

I thought you, Cathy Reisenwitz and Hillary proclaim: It Takes a Village (as long as WE pay for it)….

Your Village is NASTY at MB..and you are one of the smut-kings…

Anyway: Cathy Reisenwitz would knee you in the nuts and bust your skull w/ a baseball bat if you got to within 5 ft. of her….Pervs are repulsive. And male pervs even more-so, to radical, man-hating feme-nazis…

Reply
TontoBubbaGoldstein May 27, 2014 at 11:35 pm

For the record, TBG identifies as a small “l” libertarian, having let my Libertarian Party membership lapse about a decade ago. TBG is more a follower of David Bergland/Harry Browne’s teachings than those of FITS. No one is “attaching” TBG to liberalism as he had never heard of this chick until now, doesn’t think she is hot, and from the article, would not classify her as “libertarian”.

Reply
GrandTango May 28, 2014 at 6:07 am

TBG, you demonstrate the folly of adherence to a “movement” as it were, instead of the one Truth.

I simply identify w/ my principles as a conservative. They don’t change and are not subject to the interpretation from party insiders or governed by directives of those selling books.

I have a God-centric philosophy, based on morality, character, truth, knowledge and experience. Though, He is ravaged for it, Jesus is an example of the freedom and free-thought, I’m speaking of.

All other belief systems pale to that. And you can witness many of the less-mature, less-developed and false (and failed) ideologies on this site.

Reply
Doppelganger Big T May 28, 2014 at 8:34 am

“I have a God-centric philosophy, based on morality, character, knowledge and experience you D?%B F@CK!”

Reply
GrandTango May 28, 2014 at 9:34 am

Did Jesus ever get angry and use harsh words to describe the corrupt, unjust and deceitful…???

It may be a good Idea to have a little better understanding of what you speak, before judging others…

Sometimes the life as a cliché ensnares you, does it not???

Jesus May 28, 2014 at 10:50 am

Did Jesus ever get angry and use harsh words to describe the corrupt, unjust and deceitful…????

Did he? You sure as fuck do, and you do it to people who are not corrupt, unjust and deceitful as well, fucking moron.

GrandTango May 28, 2014 at 11:01 am

It is really common, among the common…for the very un-Knowing, and contemptuous toward God to attempt to use Scripture to try to manipulate people respectful of Him.

You have no business pontificating upon that of which you are ignorant.

Because of who, and what you are…you allow your false and deceitful gods to control you…You eagerly define yourself by your sin, yet you hate me for doing the same.

Myths & Fables May 28, 2014 at 11:09 am

There is no God.

GrandTango May 28, 2014 at 12:22 pm

So why do you liberals try to use Scripture, from God, to attack???

Ha! May 28, 2014 at 11:29 am

“Did Jesus ever get angry and use harsh words to describe the corrupt, unjust and deceitful…????”

I eagerly await your quotes of Jesus calling people “Dumb Fucks”-LMAO!

GrandTango May 28, 2014 at 12:21 pm

Are you a Christian, a follower of Jesus Christ?

Oh hell no May 27, 2014 at 11:03 am

Chick is a liberal sheep in libertarian clothes Sic Willie…you’ve been warned.

She’s part of an leftist libertarian movement that ends up in the same place as all leftist thought.

Reply
osamabinrubio May 27, 2014 at 11:53 am

Hmm…liberal sheep in libertarian clothes…I’d rather see her without any clothes personally ;)

Reply
Oh hell no May 27, 2014 at 1:21 pm

That’s exactly why she is popular. Libertarians has a dearth of females, so an half attractive one that is sexually promiscuous is bound to get some attention because there are few female libertarians to start aside from the question of how many of them are sexually loose.

The poor saps that self identify as libertarians are mesmerized by her tits and not paying attention to the shit coming out of her mouth. They are just happy to have a set of tits to look at that claim to have some libertarian leanings.

Reply
Oh hell no May 27, 2014 at 1:22 pm

*have a dearth
*so A half attractive

you get the point, typed quickly

Reply
Buz Martin May 27, 2014 at 5:13 pm

You see her tits? I don’t.

You got pictures of her tits?

Link, please.

Reply
Oh hell no May 27, 2014 at 6:13 pm

Good point!

Let’s give her the benefit of the doubt and assume they are there someplace, like most of those hanging on her every word.

osamabinrubio May 27, 2014 at 6:44 pm

You don’t need to see her tits to bash one out

Buz Martin May 27, 2014 at 7:03 pm

Hey, at my age I’m just glad I can still bash one out.

TontoBubbaGoldstein May 28, 2014 at 12:11 am

You see her tits? I don’t.

You got pictures of her tits?

Link, please.

*sighs*
This ain’t the FITS of yore, Homie.

TontoBubbaGoldstein May 27, 2014 at 11:28 pm

PRO TIP:
Nice tits are an entity to themselves. The bearer’s politics are inconsequential.

Reply
Oh hell no May 28, 2014 at 12:02 am

You’re preaching to the choir my friend. I can appreciate boobies like every other red blooded man.

I just don’t let the boobies unleash the “lizard” part of my brain(HT to Euwe) and interfere with rational thinking.(anymore I should say)

http://www.christophercantwell.com/2014/05/18/cathy-reisenwitzs-christianity-like-libertarianism/

Boobies are all good. Bring on the sweater meat. One lumps or two? Definitely two.

derp May 27, 2014 at 11:59 am

… except for the part where she’s a consistent libertarian. The fact that she takes issues like racism seriously does not indicate that she’s not solid on rights.

Reply
Oh hell no May 27, 2014 at 12:54 pm

“… except for the part where she’s a consistent libertarian.”

Since you brought up the issue of racism, let’s just take one sample of her “thoughts” on the topic recently:

“On Friday I composed a few ill-conceived tweets concerning some major libertarian thinkers. I just want to apologize for my poor judgment in doing so. Making inflammatory accusations without thoroughly backing them up with concrete examples is just a terrible idea. I regret doing it and apologize to all I’ve offended.”

Yeah, let’s hope you’re wrong and she’s not “consistent”, otherwise she’d be consistently wrong.

Derp indeed. If you want to listen to ramblings of a mentally adolescent “thinker”, feel free. Or you can just spend 10 minutes using google. Aw shit, why do I bother?

Pick your poison, thinker or stinker:

http://screen.yahoo.com/sculpture-class-000000427.html

Reply
stop trolling May 27, 2014 at 5:05 pm

Her pointing out, yet not citing, the fact that some libertarians have made racist statements in the past doesn’t make her any less a libertarian. Likely she is a more ardent libertarian than you.

Reply
Oh hell no May 27, 2014 at 6:12 pm

LMAO! She spouted off with no proof, then back tracked because she realized she is an imbecile.

She deserves ZERO credibility. She’s a gnat intellectually.

Oh hell no May 27, 2014 at 6:17 pm

Btw, there’s a rich irony in you coming to Fitsnews and whining about “trolling” when someone’s own words are brought out.

Would you like to examine more of her gems? Just say the word and we’ll get a real “troll fest” rolling.

George Williams May 27, 2014 at 12:35 pm

Child care is daily. A few hours. And requires constant attention. College is a couple of hours a couple of times a week. According to DegreeRegistry.org , a general MBA can be obtained for as little as $6k and as high as $120k. If students would do a little research, they would find that it is not nearly as expensive to get a college degree

Reply
euwe max May 27, 2014 at 1:29 pm

Woman’s love involves injustice and blindness against everything that she does not love… Woman is not yet capable of friendship: women are still cats and birds. Or at best cows…

woman! One-half of mankind is weak, typically sick, changeable, inconstant… she needs a religion of weakness that glorifies being weak, loving, and being humble as divine: or better, she makes the strong weak–she rules when she succeeds in overcoming the strong… Woman has always conspired with the types of decadence, the priests, against the “powerful”, the “strong”, the men–

A woman may very well form a friendship with a man, but for this to endure, it must be assisted by a little physical antipathy.

A real man wants two things: danger and play. Therefore he wants woman as the most dangerous plaything. Man shall be educated for war, and woman for the recreation of the warrior: all else is folly

Men have hitherto treated women like birds which have strayed down to them from the heights; as something more delicate, more fragile, more savage, stranger, sweeter, soulful – but as something which has to be caged up so that it shall not fly away

Everything in woman is a riddle, and everything in woman has one solution—that is pregnancy. For the woman, the man is a means: the end is always the child.

When a woman has scholarly inclinations there is usually something wrong with her sexuality.

Women are considered deep – why? Because one can never discover any bottom to them. Women are not even shallow.

Behind all their personal vanity, women themselves always have an impersonal contempt for woman.

Looking for women? Do not forget the whip!

Ah, women! They make the highs higher and the lows more frequent.

Reply
Elfego May 27, 2014 at 1:39 pm

I am sure you loved your mother!

Reply
euwe max May 27, 2014 at 1:45 pm

Of course! What do you think I am??? A REPUBLICAN?

Reply
Ok May 27, 2014 at 1:52 pm

So what’s your opinion on Nietzsche’s comments?

Reply
euwe max May 27, 2014 at 1:58 pm

I think he was condemning his contemporary culture, ridiculing the role model for women they prized so highly.

His genius was in the deconstruction of the absurd.

Ok May 27, 2014 at 2:12 pm

yes, I’m inclined to agree…but you haven’t given me YOUR opinion.

:)

euwe max May 27, 2014 at 2:25 pm

That was my opinion – rather than misogyny – it was a call for change.

I believe that, apart from the effects on consciousness by various steroids and hormones, the life of the mind is relatively equivalent.

Susan Polgar 1969-04-19 achieved Men’s Grandmaster norm in 1991 at the age of 22. Her peak rating was 2577.

Judit Polgár 1976-07-23 achieved Men’s Grandmaster norm in 1991 at the age of 15. Her peak rating was 2735. Youngest grandmaster ever at the time.

Pia Cramling Sweden1963-04-23199229norms–2550

Ok May 27, 2014 at 2:33 pm

Ok, you must have edited that previous reply. The “deconstruction” part of the comment wasn’t there when I responded, which is an obvious indicator.

euwe max May 27, 2014 at 2:46 pm

I’m embarrassed you could confuse me with a Republican.

Ok May 27, 2014 at 2:59 pm

I never really thought that. I know you too well.

You really do yourself a disservice by participating in the Democrat/Republican paradigm.

euwe max May 27, 2014 at 3:04 pm

I’ve been researching this problem for 10 years.. and I’ve come to the firm conclusion that the word with the single most shock value.. even beyond splooge gargling bottle squatter, is “Republican.”

You’ll rarely see me use the word “Democrat” – they remind me of sleeping sentries on watch in wartime.

Ok May 27, 2014 at 3:06 pm

You should consider “classical liberal”.

:)

euwe max May 27, 2014 at 3:08 pm

Seems cowardly… like “Progressive”

Ok May 27, 2014 at 3:12 pm

lol, why’s that? If anything, you’ll be hated by a much larger number of people.

euwe max May 27, 2014 at 3:16 pm

Really?

Well, now.. that deserves a complete review.

Ok May 27, 2014 at 4:16 pm

“I sometimes dream that all over America, fat Republican pigs frothing at my posts become so angry and agitated they have a grand mal seizure at their terminal, gasping for breath.”

Your dream is my reality my friend. I was just called a “POS” by a Republican over at the “Memorialize that” post.

In fairness though, SC Blues and SC Blue Women hate me too…so you might not like that part where self identified “lefties” hate you too.

I find being a classical liberal creates this vortex of hatred that surrounds me…with a general loss of rationality by those swirling around in it as well.

It can be pretty damned entertaining.

Randomdudeman May 27, 2014 at 6:27 pm

Just a little extra Nietzsche often used “woman” to also stand for “truth.” He compared previous philosopher’s godawful writings and elementary “rational process” to awkward adolescents trying to woo “the truth.” His statements that were quoted was between what a woman is (in his contemporary culture), and what a woman should be. Equally, and in fact more so, he was arguing for what the “form” of “truth” should be, rather than the elementary and simpleminded “truths” that were accepted at the time (and to this day). Which isn’t to say he wasn’t also talking about women, he was just that damn clever. The truth should be something pursued with ardor and passion, and if the truth you discover isn’t beautiful, well maybe you just haven’t got what it takes.

euwe max May 27, 2014 at 7:16 pm

if the truth you discover isn’t beautiful, well maybe you just haven’t got what it takes.

——-
or maybe the truth is a fat girl who doesn’t sweat much.

euwe max May 27, 2014 at 7:14 pm

The group I’ve been hanging with gets together at random intervals to compare death threats… we’ve destroyed religion boards… politics boards, book club boards… investment boards… abcnews.. hockey… countless backboards… we’ve been IP banned.. banned on identifiable handles, adjectives and phraseology… it’s rumored that we are all creations of the same mad General, infused with the personalities of his choosing, and for his entertainment and study. The artistic equivalent of the Great Masters – each word, punctuation mark, ellipsis coldly calculated for effect. He is solely responsible for the creation and continued existence of the Tea Party. Pure evil.

The only real thing I’ve learned is that if you get mad – you lose.

Squishy123 May 27, 2014 at 2:43 pm

Iron my shirt, bitch.

Reply
euwe max May 27, 2014 at 2:48 pm

You expect us to believe you wear a shirt?

Reply
SCBlues May 27, 2014 at 5:37 pm

I hope he wears one and I hope he never takes it off in front of me . . .

Reply
euwe max May 27, 2014 at 7:03 pm

He’s not into the physical – he’s all about the charm.

Reply
Squishy123 May 28, 2014 at 2:53 pm
euwe max May 28, 2014 at 3:11 pm

she’s dead.

euwe max May 27, 2014 at 2:47 pm

She needs to use a degreasing conditioner.

Reply
junior justice May 27, 2014 at 7:04 pm

Junior doesn’t trust females with starey, scarey eyes — any more.

Reply
TontoBubbaGoldstein May 28, 2014 at 12:15 am

Junior doesn’t trust females with starey, scarey eyes — any more.

Sorry that whole “Michelle Bachmann for POTUS” thing didn’t work out for you….

Reply
junior justice May 28, 2014 at 8:01 am

No, I was already in my new groove when she came on the scene.

Reply

Leave a Comment