Okay I’ve been wanting to write about this for some time and finally the synapses sparked … women with tattoos: Hot or not?
I certainly think so. One of my wife’s friends has a super hot tattoo on her foot (combining two of my all-time favorite things) … and every time my wife talks about getting one herself, I nod affirmatively (like a panting dog).
Tattoos are – in my humble estimation – artistic and erotic. Well, usually. Obviously there are plenty of exceptions to that rule – and a tattoo’s hotness is always going to be dependent on its creative conceptualization, artistic execution and (duh) physical location.
Sadly, FITS has toned down its risqué image in recent months … so I’m prohibited from showing off some of my favorite examples of ink. But suffice it to say so-called “tramp stamps” (a.k.a. “Bulls-eyes”) are on the list – as are tattoos that run down a woman’s side or her back.
Very, very hot …
Anyway, what do you think? Are tattoos hot? Not? Or … like so much in life … does it all depend?
70 comments
Good Lord I hope you’re kidding.
Not.
Not.
Depends on how hot the girl is, location, design, etc. No tramp stamps and no butterflies above the vagina.
Two down votes must be because someone loves tramp stamps.
Danged MF SKIPPY
Long, long, long time ago dated this young lady and soon discovered she had these little bumps right above her vagina and right above her ass crack.
Not wanting to put a damper on a good thing I decided to ask her best friend what was the deal with the bumps
Apparently her boyfriend a few years back was blind and to help him out she had the bumps surgically implanted to read ENTRANCE and EXIT
A guy goes into a tattoo parlor and asks for a tattoo of a $100 bill on his penis. Curious, the tattoo artist asks him why he would possibly want that.
“Three reasons: I like to play with my money, I like to watch my money grow, and a hundred dollars seems to be the only thing my wife will blow these days.”
Don’t forget the bumps around the nipples that when read say “suck me”..
But a butterfly on the taint is OK?
Absolutely NOT. those attractive little butterflies that go on those gals enjoying their twenties will turn into giant old buzzards by the time they reach their forties, and will hurt like hell to have removed.
Really? A tattoo can change into something else over time? That’s about the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard. A tattoo might shift (like a birthmark) or fade, but a butterfly won’t magically change into a buzzard once one passes a certain age.
I got my first tat in 1972. I’ve touched it up once. Still looks great. You don’t know dick.
You have the right skin and have probably kept it out of the sun – all of my friends with tats that haven’t had them touched up at least once have faded looking “somethings” – 30 years in the sun will do that to them.
One gets sun the others don’t. Moisturizer goes a long way to preservation. Using the right kind of ink does too.
“I got my first tat in 1972. I’ve touched it up once. Still looks great….One gets sun the others don’t. Moisturizer goes a long way to preservation. Using the right kind of ink does too.”
Not accusing you of stretching the truth…but pics would bolster your contention.
Just sayin’…
; )
Let me get my camera. Wait a minute, I’ll be right back.
[forum chants] “shower cam! shower cam! shower cam!”
“….Wait a minute, I’ll be right back.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0YIJQ1jgEI
I love the way they get all green and blurry.
You mean like on 80 year old Korean war vets? Inks, machines, and techniques have come a long way.
But skin and sun haven’t changed a lick.
I bet that prison tattoo you got in 1972 looks just lovely today in all those wrinkles and leathery skin.
Oh, you DO love me.
He does… he really does.
I was more referring to the canvas and not the art. And of course all you folks sporting those tats know the latency period for hept C can be tens of years, dontcha’?
Yes and that’s why you check the autoclave, among other things before you get a tat.
So you think everyone with a tattoo got them from some meth head scratcher at a tattoo party out in Pelion? Tattoo studios are heavily regulated by DHEC. Shop owners have to run spore tests on the autoclave monthly, have it monitored by a lab and keep a log.
I got a tatt on Mr. Sticky when I was 17. It’s the Gettysburg address in 12 point gothic script.
My manly oils have since evaporated somewhat.
That might not be the tat that goes to crap in their 40’s…
I wouldn’t let a little ink get in the way.
The hottie in the pic is fine. Red hair (even if it is fake), DSLs, Nice fun sacks, what’s not to love?
“I wouldn’t let a little ink get in the way.”
or in other words, “Don’t let the ink get in the way of pink.”
or, “Ink doesn’t stop you from doing 1 in the stink and 2 in the pink.”
I just cannot fathom getting a down vote on this. I’m crushed. I mean, I would turn the girl down, of course. (face down)
HOT
In general I say no, though there are always exceptions to the rule. One or two tastefully done aren’t bad, more than that are generally too much, but even with extensive coverage there can be some exceptions. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Tattoos are everywhere now. You used to only see them on Marines or biker gang members… y’know? Badasses. Tatts are sooo common now. It lost the badass stigma.
Listen up, ladies. Don’t get tattoos on your titties. They look great just the way they are. Why ruin such a wonderful thing with someone’s shitty art project?
Check out this badass… https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/s261x260/1441593_636659708518_1173703166_n.jpg
That dude has a skullet. He demands respect.
He had it put on the wrong part of his anatomy…
When TBG saw Steve Tanneyhill “Hit the Homerun” while standing on the Tigerpaw in Death Valley, he figured it would eventually lead to this mugshot….
Kinda like the rest of the skin that nature gave most women. It looks fine just the way it is.
IMHO, it is even worse on an obese woman or obese man. Better to spend your money on a Weight Watchers program, than get tattoos hoping you look more hip than fat.
But, to each his own.
“FITS has toned down its risqué image in recent months”
Damn right skippy
The days of candid shots of blue veined titties and “I Voted” stickers for pasties are indeed things of the past on this website
It is ironic the political cockroaches still take the low road chewing away unabated at the innards of taxpayers 24/7 while “fits” the protector of the lame, maimed and malnourished takes the high road to prudery
If you want to know how pussy really smells and write about it, you got to put your nose in it and push it around a little – not look at it from behind a fucking desk of hypocritical morality
It is a goddamn war out here. Time to use every fucking weapon available and that includes images of titties and pussy.
I would vote this up 100 times if I could.
Deserves a standing “O”. Or whatever position he prefers
Indeed good sir! Flip around any channel on TV you’ll easily see some dude getting his wig split or blown the fuck up… or you’ll see some doctor person conducting an autopsy or open heart surgery. Not even an eyelash is batted at gore or violence.
But if you show a titty or hint at some gash, people lose their goddamn minds. Why? Why is sex such taboo in this country and especially this state?
Could not have stated it better myself. Seriously. I couldn’t. That was sheer poetry.
Not.
If you need a permanent picture or symbol on your body to make you feel special to yourself or to someone else, consider your money might be better spent without the ugly aftermath. Personally, I’ve got spider veins that look less disfiguring.
Nah, the bare shoulder and side boob that I should be so intently focused upon (in the red haired chick above) is being distracted by someone’s horrible interpretation of art. So yeah, art belongs on a canvas, not the glorious perfection that is the female body.
You are hallucinating the side-boob. Got some good shit?
I kept going back, thought I had missed something. I didn’t.
True, skin must show to properly classify as side boob.
side boob
——
dude.. side boob is visible boob skin, not just the angle.
In most cases, no, but I will say it depends. The usual tramp stamps, nautical stars, etc. are utter garbage.
Once in a great while they’re hot – has to be the right girl and in the right place. That whole “sleeve thing” is nasty looking. The worst part of all is when she’s 40 and that “cute little butterfly tat” she got on spring break looks like a faded bat. For the most part, leave the tats to sailors and prisoners makes it easier to separate the low lifes from the normal folks.
Come on you prudes! Who doesn’t like a good tramp stamp?
Read the cereal box.
They are body pollution and people almost universally regret them later in life. Folks see them as a reminder of a time of when…”it seemed like a good idea at the time…” Nonetheless, they are largely trashy and unsightly. Yes, I suppose it is a bit highbrow of me but I just think women look great in their natural and God-given selves.
Chicks with tattoos generally speaking are the ones you want to put your condom covered penis in while unmarried and in your youth.
You don’t take them home to Momma and you don’t buy them flowers. You take them to pound town until you’ve both had enough and go your separate ways.
Disgusting.
Depends. I would have to have a case by case examination. But here’s a generalization… If she’s a 20 something hottie with a smokin’ body, sure! But a chick like that is hot no matter what. If she’s 43 with a visible saggy tit tattoo, then that’s kinda gross … and sad.
In any case… Less is more.
In the case presented (here’s the full pic)
http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/c3/18/d4/c318d48aeb1fa6dbfbb5111904ea8909.jpg
I would bury my dick in that ass so far that whoever could pull it out would be crowned the new King Arthur.
Saggy tits are gross with or without a tattoo.
God god, you guys’ standards are just way too high.
18 – 80, blind, cripple, crazy, if they can’t walk, we’ll drag ’em.
I have no tattoos, and I prefer women without tattoos. But that doesn’t make Bonnie Rotten any less hot.
Not. Permanently not.
Not, and I’m impressed that the survey is so decidedly “not” as well.
Don’t know if you’re that old, but I remember Orson Bean once said his wife got a tattoo of a flower on her chest and over the years, he has watched it become a long-stemmed rose. If you have to have a tat (NO, PLEASE), imagine what you’ll look like at 70, and choose accordingly. You don’t want to embarrass your grandkids!
Here is a link about a woman who endured 416 hours getting tattood – and she is blind!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2551868/Woman-spent-416-hours-covering-body-tattoos-never-BLIND.html
She fucked up a great profile.
Leviticus 19:28 – Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I [am] the LORD.