Random

Tattoos: Hot Or Not?

Okay I’ve been wanting to write about this for some time and finally the synapses sparked … women with tattoos: Hot or not? I certainly think so. One of my wife’s friends has a super hot tattoo on her foot (combining two of my all-time favorite things) … and every…

Okay I’ve been wanting to write about this for some time and finally the synapses sparked … women with tattoos: Hot or not?

I certainly think so. One of my wife’s friends has a super hot tattoo on her foot (combining two of my all-time favorite things) … and every time my wife talks about getting one herself, I nod affirmatively (like a panting dog).

Tattoos are – in my humble estimation – artistic and erotic. Well, usually. Obviously there are plenty of exceptions to that rule – and a tattoo’s hotness is always going to be dependent on its creative conceptualization, artistic execution and (duh) physical location.

Sadly, FITS has toned down its risqué image in recent months … so I’m prohibited from showing off some of my favorite examples of ink. But suffice it to say so-called “tramp stamps” (a.k.a. “Bulls-eyes”) are on the list – as are tattoos that run down a woman’s side or her back.

Very, very hot …

Anyway, what do you think? Are tattoos hot? Not? Or … like so much in life … does it all depend?

Related posts

Random

Programming Note: FITSNews ‘Month In Review’ Set To Launch This Week

FITSNews
Random

Alligator Charges North Georgia Deputy During K-9 Training

Andrew Fancher
Random

Palmetto Past & Present: South Carolina’s Link To A Spooky Scam

FITSNews

70 comments

historybuff February 4, 2014 at 12:10 pm

Good Lord I hope you’re kidding.

Reply
euwe max February 4, 2014 at 12:11 pm

Not.

Reply
venomachine February 4, 2014 at 12:12 pm

Not.

Reply
JJEvans February 4, 2014 at 12:15 pm

Depends on how hot the girl is, location, design, etc. No tramp stamps and no butterflies above the vagina.

Reply
idcydm February 4, 2014 at 12:54 pm

Two down votes must be because someone loves tramp stamps.

Reply
Frank Pytel February 4, 2014 at 1:14 pm

Danged MF SKIPPY

Reply
jimlewisowb February 4, 2014 at 1:26 pm

Long, long, long time ago dated this young lady and soon discovered she had these little bumps right above her vagina and right above her ass crack.

Not wanting to put a damper on a good thing I decided to ask her best friend what was the deal with the bumps

Apparently her boyfriend a few years back was blind and to help him out she had the bumps surgically implanted to read ENTRANCE and EXIT

Reply
shifty henry February 4, 2014 at 2:14 pm

A guy goes into a tattoo parlor and asks for a tattoo of a $100 bill on his penis. Curious, the tattoo artist asks him why he would possibly want that.

“Three reasons: I like to play with my money, I like to watch my money grow, and a hundred dollars seems to be the only thing my wife will blow these days.”

Reply
West of the waterway February 4, 2014 at 3:31 pm

Don’t forget the bumps around the nipples that when read say “suck me”..

Reply
Buz Martin February 4, 2014 at 10:05 pm

But a butterfly on the taint is OK?

Reply
Justsayin February 4, 2014 at 12:18 pm

Absolutely NOT. those attractive little butterflies that go on those gals enjoying their twenties will turn into giant old buzzards by the time they reach their forties, and will hurt like hell to have removed.

Reply
Jay Ellington February 4, 2014 at 1:15 pm

Really? A tattoo can change into something else over time? That’s about the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard. A tattoo might shift (like a birthmark) or fade, but a butterfly won’t magically change into a buzzard once one passes a certain age.

Reply
SCBlueWoman February 4, 2014 at 1:31 pm

I got my first tat in 1972. I’ve touched it up once. Still looks great. You don’t know dick.

Reply
The Colonel February 4, 2014 at 2:05 pm

You have the right skin and have probably kept it out of the sun – all of my friends with tats that haven’t had them touched up at least once have faded looking “somethings” – 30 years in the sun will do that to them.

Reply
SCBlueWoman February 4, 2014 at 2:13 pm

One gets sun the others don’t. Moisturizer goes a long way to preservation. Using the right kind of ink does too.

Reply
TontoBubbaGoldstein February 4, 2014 at 4:34 pm

I got my first tat in 1972. I’ve touched it up once. Still looks great….One gets sun the others don’t. Moisturizer goes a long way to preservation. Using the right kind of ink does too.

Not accusing you of stretching the truth…but pics would bolster your contention.

Just sayin’…

; )

SCBlueWoman February 4, 2014 at 4:41 pm

Let me get my camera. Wait a minute, I’ll be right back.

euwe max February 5, 2014 at 10:28 am

[forum chants] “shower cam! shower cam! shower cam!”

TontoBubbaGoldstein February 5, 2014 at 12:32 pm

“….Wait a minute, I’ll be right back.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0YIJQ1jgEI

Norma Scok February 4, 2014 at 5:06 pm

I love the way they get all green and blurry.

Reply
Jay Ellington February 5, 2014 at 1:28 am

You mean like on 80 year old Korean war vets? Inks, machines, and techniques have come a long way.

The Colonel February 5, 2014 at 6:56 am

But skin and sun haven’t changed a lick.

Squishy123 February 4, 2014 at 5:39 pm

I bet that prison tattoo you got in 1972 looks just lovely today in all those wrinkles and leathery skin.

Reply
SCBlueWoman February 4, 2014 at 9:12 pm

Oh, you DO love me.

Reply
euwe max February 5, 2014 at 10:27 am

He does… he really does.

Justsayin February 4, 2014 at 6:05 pm

I was more referring to the canvas and not the art. And of course all you folks sporting those tats know the latency period for hept C can be tens of years, dontcha’?

Reply
SCBlueWoman February 4, 2014 at 9:13 pm

Yes and that’s why you check the autoclave, among other things before you get a tat.

Reply
Jay Ellington February 5, 2014 at 1:32 am

So you think everyone with a tattoo got them from some meth head scratcher at a tattoo party out in Pelion? Tattoo studios are heavily regulated by DHEC. Shop owners have to run spore tests on the autoclave monthly, have it monitored by a lab and keep a log.

Reply
euwe max February 5, 2014 at 10:26 am

I got a tatt on Mr. Sticky when I was 17. It’s the Gettysburg address in 12 point gothic script.

My manly oils have since evaporated somewhat.

Reply
Norma Scok February 4, 2014 at 5:06 pm

That might not be the tat that goes to crap in their 40’s…

Reply
Same ol' Same ol' February 4, 2014 at 12:23 pm

I wouldn’t let a little ink get in the way.
The hottie in the pic is fine. Red hair (even if it is fake), DSLs, Nice fun sacks, what’s not to love?

Reply
Dirty Ol' Man February 4, 2014 at 11:53 pm

“I wouldn’t let a little ink get in the way.”

or in other words, “Don’t let the ink get in the way of pink.”

or, “Ink doesn’t stop you from doing 1 in the stink and 2 in the pink.”

Reply
Same ol' Same ol' February 5, 2014 at 10:57 pm

I just cannot fathom getting a down vote on this. I’m crushed. I mean, I would turn the girl down, of course. (face down)

Reply
Frank Pytel February 4, 2014 at 12:45 pm

HOT

Reply
easterndumbfuckastan February 4, 2014 at 12:54 pm

In general I say no, though there are always exceptions to the rule. One or two tastefully done aren’t bad, more than that are generally too much, but even with extensive coverage there can be some exceptions. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Reply
Nölff February 4, 2014 at 12:57 pm

Tattoos are everywhere now. You used to only see them on Marines or biker gang members… y’know? Badasses. Tatts are sooo common now. It lost the badass stigma.

Listen up, ladies. Don’t get tattoos on your titties. They look great just the way they are. Why ruin such a wonderful thing with someone’s shitty art project?

Reply
Nölff February 4, 2014 at 1:16 pm

That dude has a skullet. He demands respect.

Reply
shifty henry February 4, 2014 at 2:21 pm

He had it put on the wrong part of his anatomy…

Reply
TontoBubbaGoldstein February 4, 2014 at 5:51 pm

When TBG saw Steve Tanneyhill “Hit the Homerun” while standing on the Tigerpaw in Death Valley, he figured it would eventually lead to this mugshot….

Reply
CorruptionInColumbia February 4, 2014 at 1:17 pm

Kinda like the rest of the skin that nature gave most women. It looks fine just the way it is.

Reply
Momma's girl February 4, 2014 at 8:01 pm

IMHO, it is even worse on an obese woman or obese man. Better to spend your money on a Weight Watchers program, than get tattoos hoping you look more hip than fat.
But, to each his own.

Reply
jimlewisowb February 4, 2014 at 1:14 pm

“FITS has toned down its risqué image in recent months”

Damn right skippy

The days of candid shots of blue veined titties and “I Voted” stickers for pasties are indeed things of the past on this website

It is ironic the political cockroaches still take the low road chewing away unabated at the innards of taxpayers 24/7 while “fits” the protector of the lame, maimed and malnourished takes the high road to prudery

If you want to know how pussy really smells and write about it, you got to put your nose in it and push it around a little – not look at it from behind a fucking desk of hypocritical morality

It is a goddamn war out here. Time to use every fucking weapon available and that includes images of titties and pussy.

Reply
JJEvans February 4, 2014 at 1:31 pm

I would vote this up 100 times if I could.

Reply
MashPotato February 4, 2014 at 3:15 pm

Deserves a standing “O”. Or whatever position he prefers

Reply
Cush February 4, 2014 at 9:04 pm

Indeed good sir! Flip around any channel on TV you’ll easily see some dude getting his wig split or blown the fuck up… or you’ll see some doctor person conducting an autopsy or open heart surgery. Not even an eyelash is batted at gore or violence.

But if you show a titty or hint at some gash, people lose their goddamn minds. Why? Why is sex such taboo in this country and especially this state?

Reply
Buz Martin February 4, 2014 at 10:03 pm

Could not have stated it better myself. Seriously. I couldn’t. That was sheer poetry.

Reply
CorruptionInColumbia February 4, 2014 at 1:15 pm

Not.

Reply
guest February 4, 2014 at 1:27 pm

If you need a permanent picture or symbol on your body to make you feel special to yourself or to someone else, consider your money might be better spent without the ugly aftermath. Personally, I’ve got spider veins that look less disfiguring.

Reply
DB Cooper February 4, 2014 at 1:34 pm

Nah, the bare shoulder and side boob that I should be so intently focused upon (in the red haired chick above) is being distracted by someone’s horrible interpretation of art. So yeah, art belongs on a canvas, not the glorious perfection that is the female body.

Reply
Buz Martin February 4, 2014 at 10:04 pm

You are hallucinating the side-boob. Got some good shit?

Reply
Same ol' Same ol' February 5, 2014 at 10:37 am

I kept going back, thought I had missed something. I didn’t.
True, skin must show to properly classify as side boob.

Reply
euwe max February 5, 2014 at 10:29 am

side boob
——
dude.. side boob is visible boob skin, not just the angle.

Reply
Smirks February 4, 2014 at 1:35 pm

In most cases, no, but I will say it depends. The usual tramp stamps, nautical stars, etc. are utter garbage.

Reply
The Colonel February 4, 2014 at 2:01 pm

Once in a great while they’re hot – has to be the right girl and in the right place. That whole “sleeve thing” is nasty looking. The worst part of all is when she’s 40 and that “cute little butterfly tat” she got on spring break looks like a faded bat. For the most part, leave the tats to sailors and prisoners makes it easier to separate the low lifes from the normal folks.

Reply
TattedNiceGuy February 4, 2014 at 2:48 pm

Come on you prudes! Who doesn’t like a good tramp stamp?

Reply
euwe max February 5, 2014 at 10:01 am

Read the cereal box.

Reply
kyle February 4, 2014 at 4:25 pm

They are body pollution and people almost universally regret them later in life. Folks see them as a reminder of a time of when…”it seemed like a good idea at the time…” Nonetheless, they are largely trashy and unsightly. Yes, I suppose it is a bit highbrow of me but I just think women look great in their natural and God-given selves.

Reply
Chauvinist Pig February 4, 2014 at 4:38 pm

Chicks with tattoos generally speaking are the ones you want to put your condom covered penis in while unmarried and in your youth.

You don’t take them home to Momma and you don’t buy them flowers. You take them to pound town until you’ve both had enough and go your separate ways.

Reply
Robert February 4, 2014 at 6:23 pm

Disgusting.

Reply
Cush February 4, 2014 at 8:46 pm

Depends. I would have to have a case by case examination. But here’s a generalization… If she’s a 20 something hottie with a smokin’ body, sure! But a chick like that is hot no matter what. If she’s 43 with a visible saggy tit tattoo, then that’s kinda gross … and sad.

In any case… Less is more.

In the case presented (here’s the full pic)

http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/c3/18/d4/c318d48aeb1fa6dbfbb5111904ea8909.jpg

I would bury my dick in that ass so far that whoever could pull it out would be crowned the new King Arthur.

Reply
Jay Ellington February 5, 2014 at 9:58 am

Saggy tits are gross with or without a tattoo.

Reply
Same ol' Same ol' February 5, 2014 at 4:04 pm

God god, you guys’ standards are just way too high.
18 – 80, blind, cripple, crazy, if they can’t walk, we’ll drag ’em.

Reply
MashPotato February 4, 2014 at 8:50 pm

I have no tattoos, and I prefer women without tattoos. But that doesn’t make Bonnie Rotten any less hot.

Reply
ThreePalms February 4, 2014 at 9:06 pm

Not. Permanently not.

Reply
Mike at the Beach February 4, 2014 at 9:28 pm

Not, and I’m impressed that the survey is so decidedly “not” as well.

Reply
whatgives? February 5, 2014 at 8:16 am

Don’t know if you’re that old, but I remember Orson Bean once said his wife got a tattoo of a flower on her chest and over the years, he has watched it become a long-stemmed rose. If you have to have a tat (NO, PLEASE), imagine what you’ll look like at 70, and choose accordingly. You don’t want to embarrass your grandkids!

Reply
shifty henry February 5, 2014 at 8:59 am

Here is a link about a woman who endured 416 hours getting tattood – and she is blind!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2551868/Woman-spent-416-hours-covering-body-tattoos-never-BLIND.html

Reply
euwe max February 5, 2014 at 10:24 am

She fucked up a great profile.

Reply
Arlen Cooper February 5, 2014 at 12:07 pm

Leviticus 19:28 – Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I [am] the LORD.

Reply

Leave a Comment