90,609,000 Problems (But A Job Ain’t One)
90,609,000 … That’s a big number isn’t it? And while it doesn’t get the sameYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
90,609,000 … That’s a big number isn’t it? And while it doesn’t get the sameYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
5 comments
In the time of chimpanzees, I was a monkey.
Let’s take a look at this page, last updated in February of this year, but the labor participation rate isn’t too much lower from what it is today:
http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat03.htm
Those not in the labor force…
16 and over (total): 88,310,000
16-19: 11,162,000
20-24: 6,337,000
25-54: 23,061,000
55-64: 13,608,000
65 and over: 34,142,000
16-19 are basically kids going through or just leaving high school, likely people to be working part time jobs. 20-24 likely contains a lot of college students, but also likely contains people who chose not to go to college.
25-54 and 55-64 are arguably the most important numbers because these are the ages we’d expect people to really need to be employed. This only accounts for 36,669,000 of the total 88,310,000 people.
The 65+ category is nearly equal to that, but typically those persons are eligible for retirement, whether it be a pension, their retirement savings, Social Security & Medicare, etc. If you look at the site, nearly half of the 65+ category is 75 years or older, too. 16,833,000 people 75 years or older.
Now, as mentioned earlier, as the boomers slowly shift into the 65+ category over the next 15 years, the labor participation rate is only going to get worse. There’s a lot of different effects that will have on our economy and government programs, which would lead to very lengthy discussions, but the one undeniable fact is that labor participation will continue to decline.
So, apparently there’s 90,609,000 problems, but proper contextual breakdown for a fair discussion about one key figure from the BLS report ain’t one.
The attached is a balanced analysis from the WP. Retiring workers is certainly a factor, but how much of one is not clear. Plus, the mere fact that one is older also does not necessarily mean they wanted to retire rather than giving up on the idea of finding work in this economy. I have at least one relative that falls into the latter description. WP cites estimates that the impact from retirement contributes from 1/4 to more than 50% of the decline. But it is abundantly clear that this is not just a retirement issue: “The participation rate for workers between ages 16 and 54 fell sharply during the recession and still hasn’t recovered. Obviously retirements can’t explain this” drop.
Plus, it is worth mentioning, as the Democrats demogague by calling anyone who opposes the debt limit increase a terrorist, the aging of our population is one of the main reasons why our debt and entitlement spending is unsustainable. It is hard to sustain a pyramid scheme without an influx of new contributors. We have a huge population approaching retirement age and are just below replacement level on our demographics.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/09/06/the-incredible-shrinking-labor-force-again/
Don’t be a chump and get a job, get elected and live the high life instead. Tis easier to be a parasite than a worker bee.
Everyone looks up to pols more than workers anyway.
Where’s SCDEW???