News Releases

SC Senator Holding Obamacare Hearings

Sen. Tom Davis (R-Beaufort) will chair a special Senate Committee to gather public input on H.3101, Freedom of Health Care Protection Act in response to the Patient Unaffordable Care Act. Below is the meeting schedule memo: M E M O R A N D U M TO: H. 3101 Select Committee…

Sen. Tom Davis (R-Beaufort) will chair a special Senate Committee to gather public input on H.3101, Freedom of Health Care Protection Act in response to the Patient Unaffordable Care Act.

Below is the meeting schedule memo:

M E M O R A N D U M

TO: H. 3101 Select Committee Members: Senator John Matthews, Senator Greg Hembree, Senator Ray Cleary, Senator Kevin Johnson, Senator Kevin Bryant, Senator Thomas McElveen

FROM: Senator Tom Davis, Chairman, H.3101 Select Committee

SUBJECT: H. 3101 Select Committee Public Hearing Schedule

The H. 3101 Select Committee public hearing schedule is as follows:

Tuesday, November 5, 6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m.
Greenville County Public Library, 25 Heritage Green Place, Greenville, SC

Wednesday, November 6, 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 noon
SC Senate Gressette Building, Columbia, SC Room 209 G – meeting room

Wednesday, November 6, 6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m.
North Charleston City Hall, Third Floor, Council Chambers, 2500 City Hall Lane, North Charleston, SC

(Editor’s Note: The above communication is a news release from an elected official and does not necessarily reflect the editorial position of FITSNews.com. To submit your letter, news release, email blast, media advisory or issues statement for publication, click here).

Related posts

SC

New Center To Help Victims of Abuse, Domestic Violence And Sexual Assault Opens In Colleton County

news_releases
More News

SCDP Issues Statement On Ramon Schwartz

news_releases
More News

Jeff Duncan: Senate Correct To Cancel Recess

FITSNews

15 comments

Barry Smith October 23, 2013 at 12:57 pm

Maybe they should discuss this at their meeting… http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/10/tom-davis-south-carolina-gettysburg

Reply
CNSYD October 23, 2013 at 1:09 pm

Sound and fury signifying nothing.

Reply
Smirks October 23, 2013 at 1:19 pm

It is the stated policy of the South Carolina General Assembly that
provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010
grossly exceed the powers delegated to the federal government in the
Constitution.

Except that SCOTUS quite clearly said they didn’t, other than that they cannot force states to accept Medicaid expansion.

The General Assembly of South Carolina has the absolute and sovereign
authority to interpose and refuse to enforce the provisions of the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 that exceed the
authority of the Congress.

You refused to enact a state-run exchange or expand the Medicaid program, as per your rights. As such, the federal government will run its own exchange. So, are you going to refuse to allow SC citizens to decide for themselves if they want to sign up for health insurance?

Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a
person or business is being harmed by implementation of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act and that proceedings would be in the
public interest, the Attorney General may bring an action in the name of
the State against such person or entity causing the harm to restrain by
temporary restraining order, temporary injunction, or permanent
injunction the use of such method, act, or practice.

DING DING DING DING DING! SC will essentially spend big money to fight a bunch of crap in court.

A South Carolina resident taxpayer who is subjected to a tax by the
Internal Revenue Code under 26 U.S.C. Section 5000A of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act shall receive a tax deduction in the
exact amount of the taxes or penalty paid the federal government
pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Section 5000A. The tax deduction allowed by this
section must be used in the year the federal tax or penalty is paid.

Suit yourself, that just takes money out of SC government’s coffers.

No agency, department, or other state entity, including, but not limited
to, the Department of Social Services and the Department of Health and
Human Services, may authorize an employee, contractor, vendor, or any
other person acting on behalf of the department to conduct or
participate in an involuntary maternal, infant, and early childhood
in-home visitation pursuant to Section 2951 of the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and any subsequent federal act that
amends that section or that may refer to an entity or a process
established pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
of 2010.

DING DING DING DING DING! Pants on fire!

But the program they pointed to provides grants for voluntary help to
at-risk families from trained staff like nurses and social workers.

What bloggers describe would be an egregious abuse of the law — not what’s allowed by it. We rate the claim Pants on Fire.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/aug/21/blog-posting/bloggers-say-obamacare-provision-will-allow-forced/

The tax deduction is acceptable, the rest is utter garbage.

Reply
Frank Pytel October 23, 2013 at 5:10 pm

SCOTUS also put limits on the 2nd amendment, ergo they are always correct, right?

Reply
Vanguard16 October 23, 2013 at 5:18 pm

Interesting,

Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a
person or business is being harmed by implementation of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act and that proceedings would be in the
public interest, the Attorney General may bring an action in the name of
the State against such person or entity causing the harm to restrain by
temporary restraining order, temporary injunction, or permanent
injunction the use of such method, act, or practice.

Looks like if an employee losses his/her job or has his/her hours cut, the then AG will file suit against that employer.

Reply
the govt we deserve October 23, 2013 at 1:59 pm

Is the juvenile misspelling in the original document released by Davis?

Reply
snickering October 23, 2013 at 2:11 pm

I’m guessing Tom Davis is running again and needs money. Cue the fake, pointless, money wasting hearings.

Reply
? October 23, 2013 at 2:21 pm

lol…exactly. My first thought on reading this is that Davis should be holding a hearing titled:

“Come cry over the milk we spilled while giving me some money.”

Reply
Beachtiger0412 October 23, 2013 at 4:22 pm

Why are these people wasting their time and the state’s money??? Affordable Care Act is the law of the land – it is NOT going to be overturned. There is nothing they can base anything on right now – other than how bad the website is. Nothing will be accomplished with these “hearings” better known as witch hunts.

Reply
Frank Pytel October 23, 2013 at 5:08 pm

kind of like the 2nd amendment. Law of the land,right. Leave it alone.

Reply
Kel October 23, 2013 at 5:55 pm

No one’s touching the 2nd amendment. You’ve been scared into thinking that

Reply
Kel October 24, 2013 at 12:30 pm

Washington Times?

Frank Pytel October 24, 2013 at 12:50 pm

Well how many 5000 would you like bub. You know dam well it’s happening. The Republicrats and the Demlicans both are following the charge of Obutthead. 75% of the people hate the gubmint and they know it. That many people hating you with that many guns is just scary for them.

I know I would sure as hell be wanting everyone to drop there weapons if they ALL hated me. That’s why there holding up Smirks CWP. I keep complaining :)

euwe max October 25, 2013 at 3:28 am

We could get rid of Obamacare in one fell swoop! Make carrying a handgun mandatory. If you can’t afford one, one will be provided to you by the state.

Reply

Leave a Comment