Observing Nancy Mace
On behalf of his Liber-TEA political advocacy organization, FITS founding editor Will Folks had the You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
On behalf of his Liber-TEA political advocacy organization, FITS founding editor Will Folks had the
11 comments
I was going to make an edjookayshun joke about her terrible grammar, but now I just feel bad for her. This is getting sad, but not Palin-at-least-made-millions sad. She’s obviously not a politician in any sense of the word and she’s going to be crushed. The FITS thing hasn’t even been utilized yet, and I hope for her sake, it won’t need to be.
I like Graham, but I like a good SC political throw-down. This isn’t shaping up to be a fight at all.
MACE is a rotten little spoiled gal.
Who help ruin The Citadel and now wants to help Haley finish off South Carolina.
A vote for Mace is like a vote for Haley.
Yep, and why is Sic Willie giving Mace points for trying to piggy-back off of someone else’s fundraiser? It only shows that she can’t raise money on her own. Lame and desperate. Davis should have shown her the door.
“The worst construction? That Mace is an experienced candidate who has yet to figure out the ropes of a statewide campaign (this is her first bid for elected office, remember).”
Perhaps you meant for this to read “…an inexperienced candidate”?
If she keeps on going like this, we’re stuck with Bright vs. Graham. Wonderful.
Anybody but Ms. Lindsey.
Whatever, anything is better than Linda Gayham
Wait – you said in that other article comparing Davis’ fundraising to Haley’s that Davis wasn’t accepting PAC money. If so, then why were you at that fundraiser “on behalf of your Liber-TEA PAC?”
Did she ask Tom Davis any questions while she was there..??
Ms.Mace reminds our Funding Editor of “Kombat” Katherine “Sweet Toes” Jenerette.
In a few months voters will be saying,”Nancy who?”
Tea-Buggers. Quacks. Quack-os.
Nancy who?
Tea-bugger quacks.