SC

SCDSS: “Storm Brewing”

Last week, this website published a story recapping the various and sundry scandals to befall S.C. GYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Last week, this website published a story recapping the various and sundry scandals to befall S.C. G
You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Related posts

SC

For Two Quiet Hours, Every Child Belonged at the South Carolina State Fair

Jenn Wood
SC

Parents Demand S.C. Charter Board Revoke School Operator’s Contract

Dylan Nolan
SC

Parents To Stage Walkout Of South Carolina Charter School

Dylan Nolan

12 comments

Thatrugisntgonnamunchitself September 18, 2013 at 2:32 pm

There will be no “probing” of anything in the SCDSS and certainly no need for condoments, Saran wrap will do just fine.

Reply
Quest2013 September 18, 2013 at 5:49 pm

Why would anyone think that an AUDIT would do any good????? Every agency under the Govenor’s watch that has had problems have had audits and not one thing has been done. The leaders in these agencies just laugh because they are untouchable. Why waste the tax peoples money on audits that go no where? The things that have gone on over the past couple of years within state government have been done while the entire state watched. No questions have been asked, no investigations have been done, and audits are a waste of time. Just don’t get it……I do not think that anybody really cares.

Reply
Staffer September 18, 2013 at 7:43 pm

Nikki Haley vetoed the State Treasurer’s bill in 2012 to allow the Treasurer to follow up on audits. As of now there is no one to follow up on the audits and to make sure the inadequate procedures are corrected. I wondered why she vetoed it at the time. My boss (a house member) voted to uphold her veto even though he knew the bill was a good one. He regrets his vote now.

Reply
OldCodger September 18, 2013 at 6:04 pm

By The Way — Is Sharon F still the “lobbyist” for DSS?

She did very well for years as Exec for the Pharmacy Assn., but haven’t been able to find out if she is still doing jher thing as lobbyist.

Reply
snickering September 22, 2013 at 3:45 pm

Is Sharon F, Sharon Fennell?

Reply
ShutupImtalking September 18, 2013 at 8:48 pm

The LAC needs to talk to staff in the trenches…if they can get anyone to speak freely without fear of retaliation. Employees are working evenings and weekends to try to stay afloat while they are told that the county offices don’t need extra staff. All the while, the Agency Director is hiring out of state ‘talent’ at an alarming rate to fill custom-created positions. Wonder why the data is not exemplary! Meanwhile, county staff have to jump through hoops to BEG just to fill vacancies as they occur… Front line staff know the solution, it’s not magic, it’s called caseload reduction through equalized hiring practices. But, oh yeah, Lillian doesn’t approve of hiring staff that actually do the work. She doesn’t want Haley to look like she’s growing the government, even though the agency has been decimated by staff losses. Go to the County offices for the truth, but offer protection to those brave enough to speak.

Reply
nitrat September 18, 2013 at 11:18 pm

Sounds like wage and hour violations, federal labor law violations.
Wouldn’t be the first time DSS has had this problem…

Reply
Carolina Girl September 18, 2013 at 10:49 pm

Any audit or fault finding that happens, be sure that Haley will not release the reports! Just like the SLED report regarding the hacking of the Dept of Revenue. She refuses to let the public know what was written, because, of course, Haley was responsible for the breach that occurred, under her jurisdiction!

Reply
Nanaksar September 19, 2013 at 10:39 am

Who’s responsible for the missing money at the Sikh temple? Was it Nikki or Ajit?

Reply
shifty henry September 19, 2013 at 11:34 am

Ask Sarah Palin………..

Reply
Owen September 19, 2013 at 11:45 am

Brad Hutto is involved for the sole purpose of protecting the Democrat heavy rank and file SCDSS personnel. He should be investigating the corrupt ODC his owner and handler Jean Toal runs. He knows a lot about that cesspool of secret political insider dealing.

Reply
Robert Kittle September 20, 2013 at 9:02 am

Will,
Without getting into the main argument, I’m writing about your assertion that it should be State House, two words, instead of Statehouse. The AP Stylebook says it should be one word. I think one of the main arguments is that if you’re talking about the collective Statehouse, where the state’s business is done, it’s clearer to make that one word. Otherwise, there’s confusion between State House (of Representatives) and State House (both House of Representatives and Senate). If it’s one word, there’s no ambiguity.

Reply

Leave a Comment