The State Flip Flops On Ron Morris
After being excoriated for his paper’s spineless kowtowing to University of South Carolina heaYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
After being excoriated for his paper’s spineless kowtowing to University of South Carolina heaYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
23 comments
Will, you can’t get anything right. Statement was from editor Mark Lett. Check Deadspin.
“Eff the facts.” …….FITS News.
No doubt we can count on the State Newspaper to report the facts!! LMAO!! Gamecocks now have a cheerleader, hand picked by Adolf Spurrier writing for you. Hope you’re happy!! Keep drinking the kool-aid!
sluuuurp. yum. Sieg Heil.
Look at how bad they suck up to Nikki Haley – do you expect anything less from a sports writer???
If you somehow think the State “sucks up” to Nikki Haley, you must live in an alternative universe. The State has served as a virtual cheerleader for Dick Harpootlian and Sheheen ever since Haley was elected. I don’t particularly like her, but The State’s constant flogging of the dead horse “ethics” issue is all you need to see to know that the newspaper is hardly in her corner. They should go ahead and publish their endorsement of Sheheen.
The mere fact that both of you believe opposite sides, is proof that spin and favoritism are often in the mind of the reader.
As for FITS comment that this is embarrassing for the Palmetto state, that’s a bit of a stretch.
Anyone else think it’s time for a new publisher at the State? Henry Haitz III should be the one without the job.
I like you.
Who cares? Newspapers are on the way out anyway. All this looks like to me is a bunch of fighting about which dinosaur is best when there’s a meteor hurtling towards Earth.
It seems this whole town is crooked. Rock on Ron!
The State is also going to Facebook only comments.
Back in the days Burger refers to there was no competition for news. People had to shut-up and take it. Now they can go elsewhere to get sports coverage and they are…in droves.
It’s the same reason sites like this have grown. And yet, this site maintains that the public should just shut-up and take what the paper gives them? Because Morris is a journalist, he should not be subjected to the same market forces we all are?
If Morris had the numbers (read $) the paper would have told the coach to suck it in the first place. This is not about a reporter breaking a scandal and being fired for it. This is about a sports opinion writer without a paying audience.
Burger is another ass clown
Hey Coach just wanted to let you know Ron Morris is on the sideline covering the game
Yes that’s right, said the AD gave him a press pass
For real Coach, you ain’t coming out to the field
Coach, our boys and Vandy’s boys have already done the coin toss, you gotta come on out
OK Coach I’ll tell him
How in the hell in front of 80,000 people am I going to tell a reporter that he is now the head coach and oh, by the way, fuck you and fuck the horse you rode in on
In the shaky position of news print these days, it’s not a wise decision to support the personal vendetta’s of it’s writers at the cost of readers and advertisers. It seems that Fits believes Ron Morris can make wild accusations and make inflammatory comments about Spurrier and the team most people in the Midlands support; however, it is unacceptable for Spurrier to be critical in response. Apparently, we ought to give Ron Morris a freakin’ medal for his “courage” to write biased articles that reflect poorly on the majority of his readership (e.g. immediately writing that it was vindictive USC fans that vandalized the rock… good call Ron).
I wouldn’t have a problem if the paper and/or Ron disclosed his bias or portayed him as a counterpoint, but they don’t. We are supposed to assume his articles about Spurrier and USC come from a neutral or even supportive viewpoint, which is a dishonesty that I cannot support.
The paper should not be criticized for not “going down with a sinking ship” that is costing it money. (The Herman Helms days of print media monopoly are over, they have to realize in this era that people will get their news elsewhere if they are not responsive to their customers). Just because something is controversial doesn’t make it “fit to print.” The market doesn’t want Ron covering Gamecock athletics, the same way that the Greenville News would probably lose readers if they hired Glenn Snyder to cover Clemson.
Fits, if one of your writers started pumping out articles criticizing and lobbing baseless accusations at Tom Davis and Nancy Mace every week, how long would you be “courageous enough” to keep them on the payroll?
And you know for a fact that what Ron Morris wrote was not the truth? Think about it… Why is Spurrier so intent on getting rid of Ron?
I know he was wrong about the Clemson vandal and no source backed him up on the poaching allegations for example. His articles in general took early opportunity to place negative spin.
Read this: http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/60422162
It’s a sad day for The State when Haitz doesn’t even have the balls to be a pussy.
He’s a double dipped pussy supreme being violated by a banana with a cherry on top.
The State has abdicated its right to be an important part of this community. Excepting obituaries and local sports, why the heck would anyone read that paper?
I left it years ago and have not missed a beat.
Only in the newsgathering business is giving the customers what they want considered spineless. “Just shut up and give us your money. We know what’s best. “
Blame Obama for this, too.