Uncategorized

OK Governor Issues “Baby Veronica” Extradition Order

Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin today signed an extradition order for Dusten Brown, meaning he will beYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin today signed an extradition order for Dusten Brown, meaning he will be
You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Related posts

CRIME & COURTS

Nancy Mace Pushes Feds To Take Over Federico Murder Case

FITSNews
Crossroads 2026

In Studio: Attorney General Candidate David Pascoe

Will Folks
SC Politics

Rom Reddy: Politician-Led DOGE Commissions A ‘Ruse’

Will Folks

20 comments

Jayhawk September 4, 2013 at 10:33 pm

leave her in O.K. ? Old Kansas? O Klahoma?

Reply
Your Mama September 4, 2013 at 10:37 pm

That’s the abbreviation for Oklahoma, genius.

Reply
The Colonel September 5, 2013 at 1:42 am

No Mama, the standard abbreviation for Oklahoma is OK.

Reply
Reading Comprehension September 5, 2013 at 6:28 am

No, Mama and Colonel, the abbreviation for Oklahoma, according to the AP Stylebook, which should apply here – not the postal abbreviation – is “Okla.”
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/735/02/
Now that we have that settled, we can get to talkin’ ’bout Baby Veronica.

Reply
jimlewisowb September 5, 2013 at 1:41 pm

In consideration of all of the above the correct abbreviation for South Carolina would be,

FU

Mike Hammer September 4, 2013 at 11:04 pm

She is definitely an OK Broad- I’m going to put her in my next adventure.

Reply
Reading Comprehension September 5, 2013 at 6:32 am

Ha! I suspect Sic will see my correction below and fix this right on up, being as he’s the “Editor” here and all. As to the topic at hand, Fallin did the right thing in this case, so I will agree that she’s an okay broad.

Reply
shifty henry September 5, 2013 at 8:11 am

Now that we can all get back on point, I’m wondering how many prospective adoptions are being reconsidered by folks. To invest one’s emotional and financial inventories into an adoption and not knowing if or when it could be invalidated would cause some deep thinking.

Reply
nitrat September 5, 2013 at 11:27 am

This adoption was not ‘validated’ until a few weeks ago when the SC supreme court ordered a family court judge to do so without a hearing on terminating the biological parent’s rights. That really should bother people…such as any people who have a young son, adopted or biological, who might get a girlfriend knocked up someday and that girlfriend decide to sell the baby.
There are thousands of children in foster care across this country where parental rights have been lawfully terminated. Families like the ‘Boeings’ don’t want them. When you buy a baby, like in this case, I guess caveat emptor applies.
If you read the original SC supreme court order at sccourts.org sending the child to the father, you would see that either the Boeings made errors, intentional or innocent, in the required steps to notify this father and the Cherokees that they were taking the child out of Oklahoma. If they had followed the law, we would not be here today.

Reply
Derp September 5, 2013 at 11:56 am

I think one good way to avoid having your baby adopted without your consent is to refrain from consenting. Too bad Brown didn’t do that.

Reply
nitrat September 5, 2013 at 12:23 pm

Read the original SC supreme court order at sccourts.org giving him custody and be enlightened.

Reply
Frank Pytel September 5, 2013 at 8:33 am

I’m not privy to all the court documents, but I have yet to see where he was found to be an unfit parent. The childs biological parent is always the best choice. He’s available. He wants her. Sup? I don’t get it. Typical family court liberal hot dogging. ‘You’re not perfect because you’re a man, therefore you’re not getting your child. Your child is better off without you because you’re a man.’

Frack that crap.

Reply
Guest Poster September 5, 2013 at 10:53 am

“Family court liberal hot dogging.” Please. You have no idea what you’re talking about, Pytel. “The child’s biological parent is always the best choice.” That statement alone shows your ignorance. This has nothing to do with a man or a woman being a more fit parent. This is about a couple – a man and a woman – who legally adopted a child.

Reply
Frank Pytel September 5, 2013 at 11:21 am

Typical anti male sentiments. Therapy will help with that. When you decide to look at all the facts, and not just those that benefit your politics, holla at me biatch.

Reply
gillon September 5, 2013 at 2:43 pm

“The child’s biological parent is always the best choice.”
What an ignorant statement. And to suggest that this decision has anything to do with a “liberal” family court is just further idiocy. I hope that you you do indeed seek therapy. And this is from a male point of view.

Reply
nitrat September 5, 2013 at 11:25 am

Sorry, a biological parent who wants and is able to provide for their child IS INDEED always the best choice.
Only in the bizarro world of evangelical adoption corporations would anyone think differently.
And, this child was not “legally adopted” until a few weeks ago.

Reply
Curious September 5, 2013 at 1:32 pm

Yes, the adoption process was obstructed for 18 months by the bio dad, and messed up by the SC courts, which have since been reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court, hence the delay. But, as you admit, she was legally adopted. Just because Brown doesn’t like that outcome, he cannot flout the law. Veronica is the Capobiaoncos’ daughter.

Reply
nitrat September 5, 2013 at 7:13 pm

The Boeings botched this by their ‘mistakes’ in Oklahoma.
Keep on believing what they tell you at church…

nitrat September 5, 2013 at 11:30 am

Amy, what kind of connections do you have to Nightlight Christian Adoptions? Their Greenville office has been involved in this case from the beginning.

Reply
Honkey Whitebread September 5, 2013 at 1:38 pm

This is nothing that couldn’t be solved by all parties getting together and smoking a peace pipe.

Reply

Leave a Comment