Globe

Free Press? Not In The UK

Great Britain’s “conservative” government forced one of its largest newspapers to You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Great Britain’s “conservative” government forced one of its largest newspapers to
You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Related posts

US & World

Amanda Cunningham: The Reach For Freedom

Amanda Cunningham
Globe

Letter: About That Semiconductor Guest Column …

FITSNews
Globe

Joe Biden Dials It Back In Ukraine

Will Folks

5 comments

Frank Pytel August 21, 2013 at 2:38 pm

Is there a Free Land left on the planet?

Reply
EJB August 21, 2013 at 3:50 pm

Good thing it was all electronic files, you know hard to copy and otherwise transmit to other devices or hide on little thingys the size of your thumb. We’ll never, ever see any of these files surface ever again, for sure.

Reply
SenseLikeChaps August 21, 2013 at 5:41 pm

They’ve been open that it is a purely symbolic gesture. The “you’ve had your debate” bit is the one that should really concern people.

Reply
Patriot August 21, 2013 at 6:19 pm

One of the safeguards that Britain has over U.S. — Had the Supremes ruled otherwise in Sullivan vs. the New York Times, I wouldn’t have such a problem, but the Fourth Estate (read: “Fifth Column”) can slander/libel “public officials” with impunity.

The writers of the First Amendment never intended this – they merely wanted Ben Franklin to be able to issue his anonymous “broadsides” against anyone who supported the King.

Like it or not, the Constitution is supposed to protect us from the Government – not from the “Yellow Press”.

Reply
Manray9 August 22, 2013 at 5:31 pm

The UK does not have the equivalent of our “Bill of Rights.” This was one major reason for the contentious debate over ratification of the U.S. Constitution. The promise of an enumerated “Bills of Rights” was essential to obtain ratification by NY, VA and some other states. In the UK individual rights grow out of the common law with some statutory additions. British rights are not based on the bedrock of a written constitution and are, or maybe I should say “were,” less firm and immutable than ours.

Reply

Leave a Comment