News Releases

SCGOP: Sheheen An “Obamacare Acolyte”

Experts say Obamacare’s expansion will come at a significant cost to South Carolina families aYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Experts say Obamacare’s expansion will come at a significant cost to South Carolina families a
You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Related posts

SC

New Center To Help Victims of Abuse, Domestic Violence And Sexual Assault Opens In Colleton County

news_releases
More News

SCDP Issues Statement On Ramon Schwartz

news_releases
More News

Jeff Duncan: Senate Correct To Cancel Recess

FITSNews

9 comments

tomstickler August 7, 2013 at 1:00 pm

Make sure to keep this drivel in your archives so that historians can find it after Obamacare proves to be a benefit to South Carolinians.

Reply
tomstickler August 7, 2013 at 1:00 pm

Make sure to keep this drivel in your archives so that historians can find it after Obamacare proves to be a benefit to South Carolinians.

This may be the defining issue in the 2014 gubernatorial election.

Reply
lawzoo August 7, 2013 at 2:59 pm

“Democratic gubernatorial nominee Vincent Sheheen…supports much of federal health care reform.” (John O’Connor, “Sheheen Backs Health Reform, Immigrant Law”, McClatchy Newspapers, 8/26/10)

If I’m not mistaken the “much” was limited to Dad’s Ins. until 26, no pre-existing
problem exclusions, no one turned down,other expanded coverage and all the good benefits that the health insurance industry used to deny in toto.

In other words limited to what everyone approves of if it came at no cost.

Reply
lawzoo August 7, 2013 at 2:59 pm

“Democratic gubernatorial nominee Vincent Sheheen…supports much of federal health care reform.” (John O’Connor, “Sheheen Backs Health Reform, Immigrant Law”, McClatchy Newspapers, 8/26/10)

If I’m not mistaken the “much” was limited to Dad’s Ins. until 26, no pre-existing
problem exclusions, no one turned down,other expanded coverage and all the good benefits that the health insurance industry used to deny in toto.

In other words limited to what everyone approves of if it came at no cost.

Reply
Sam August 8, 2013 at 12:49 pm

SC PUBLIC – HALEY MISSTEPS THREATEN STATE’S CHILDREN

Reply
Sam August 8, 2013 at 12:49 pm

SC PUBLIC – HALEY MISSTEPS THREATEN STATE’S CHILDREN

Reply
Smirks August 9, 2013 at 8:37 am

Here’s an interesting bit:

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/aug/08/ted-deutch/florida-democrats-say-gov-rick-scott-and-legislatu/

I know it is Florida, but it shows something interesting.

Florida grants its insurance commissioner a range of powers. McCarty
can negotiate lower rates with companies. He can refuse rates that the
state determines to be too high.

The federal government can do neither of those things.

A Kaiser Family Foundation study in 2010 found that those states with robust authority to approve or disapprove rates were “able to extract significant reductions.”

Ya don’t say! I wonder, is our DoI doing anything like this?

We don’t expand Medicaid, we don’t run an exchange (or want to let Uncle Sam run one for us) to increase competition, we don’t negotiate better prices, we take no measurable steps to improve health insurance rates on our own. Yes, let’s fight all the things that can make health care a bit more affordable knowing it won’t stop the costs associated with other parts of the reform, then let’s pretend that clearly nothing could be done to stop rising rates and blame reform that isn’t going away.

Reply
Smirks August 9, 2013 at 8:37 am

Here’s an interesting bit:

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/aug/08/ted-deutch/florida-democrats-say-gov-rick-scott-and-legislatu/

I know it is Florida, but it shows something interesting.

Florida grants its insurance commissioner a range of powers. McCarty
can negotiate lower rates with companies. He can refuse rates that the
state determines to be too high.

The federal government can do neither of those things.

A Kaiser Family Foundation study in 2010 found that those states with robust authority to approve or disapprove rates were “able to extract significant reductions.”

Ya don’t say! I wonder, is our DoI doing anything like this?

We don’t expand Medicaid, we don’t run an exchange (or want to let Uncle Sam run one for us) to increase competition, we don’t negotiate better prices, we take no measurable steps to improve health insurance rates on our own. Yes, let’s fight all the things that can make health care a bit more affordable knowing it won’t stop the costs associated with other parts of the reform, then let’s pretend that clearly nothing could be done to stop rising rates and blame reform that isn’t going away.

Reply
Smirks August 9, 2013 at 8:37 am

Here’s an interesting bit:

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/aug/08/ted-deutch/florida-democrats-say-gov-rick-scott-and-legislatu/

I know it is Florida, but it shows something interesting.

Florida grants its insurance commissioner a range of powers. McCarty
can negotiate lower rates with companies. He can refuse rates that the
state determines to be too high.

The federal government can do neither of those things.

A Kaiser Family Foundation study in 2010 found that those states with robust authority to approve or disapprove rates were “able to extract significant reductions.”

Ya don’t say! I wonder, is our DoI doing anything like this?

We don’t expand Medicaid, we don’t run an exchange (or want to let Uncle Sam run one for us) to increase competition, we don’t negotiate better prices, we take no measurable steps to improve health insurance rates on our own. Yes, let’s fight all the things that can make health care a bit more affordable knowing it won’t stop the costs associated with other parts of the reform, then let’s pretend that clearly nothing could be done to stop rising rates and blame reform that isn’t going away.

Reply

Leave a Comment