SC

House Republicans Assail Haley’s “Weak” Vetoes

Members of the S.C. Senate aren’t the only ones piling on S.C. Gov. Nikki Haley for her less-tYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Members of the S.C. Senate aren’t the only ones piling on S.C. Gov. Nikki Haley for her less-t
You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Related posts

SC

For Two Quiet Hours, Every Child Belonged at the South Carolina State Fair

Jenn Wood
SC

Parents Demand S.C. Charter Board Revoke School Operator’s Contract

Dylan Nolan
SC

Parents To Stage Walkout Of South Carolina Charter School

Dylan Nolan

32 comments

I likes me spinach June 27, 2013 at 3:18 pm

“That’s pathetic … especially coming from a so-called “Tea Party” Republican.”

She meant an Indian Tea party my friend.

Reply
Marie Harrison June 27, 2013 at 3:32 pm

She’s a damn Asian who calls herself white and a damn Sikh who calls herself Christian. What do you expect?

Reply
scyankee June 27, 2013 at 8:18 pm

no that wasn’t racist.

Reply
Shaddup June 28, 2013 at 11:43 am

You’re the type of person that makes southerners hate Yankee’s. Stop making us all look like assholes.

Reply
Torch June 27, 2013 at 5:32 pm

Darjeeling tea

Reply
I likes me spinach June 27, 2013 at 3:18 pm

“That’s pathetic … especially coming from a so-called “Tea Party” Republican.”

She meant an Indian Tea party my friend.

Reply
Marie Harrison June 27, 2013 at 3:32 pm

She’s a damn Asian who calls herself white and a damn Sikh who calls herself Christian. What do you expect?

Reply
scyankee June 27, 2013 at 8:18 pm

no that wasn’t racist.

Reply
Shaddup June 28, 2013 at 11:43 am

You’re the type of person that makes southerners hate Yankee’s. Stop making us all look like assholes.

Reply
Torch June 27, 2013 at 5:32 pm

Darjeeling tea

Reply
Frank Pytel June 27, 2013 at 3:22 pm

““I mean, we passed the (budget) 54-42. We were just about BEGGING for substantive vetoes to sustain. We got these nit-picky vetoes instead.””
So why did the Repuklicrats and Demlicans override those nit-picky vetoes on the order of just over 50% to date?

Reply
Frank Pytel June 27, 2013 at 3:22 pm

““I mean, we passed the (budget) 54-42. We were just about BEGGING for substantive vetoes to sustain. We got these nit-picky vetoes instead.””
So why did the Repuklicrats and Demlicans override those nit-picky vetoes on the order of just over 50% to date?

Reply
Gillon June 27, 2013 at 3:51 pm

Let me understand this: You have overwhelming Republican majorities in both the House and the Senate, and yet it is somehow Haley’s fault that the budget reflects excessive spending? If the General Assembly wants an austere budget, they should pass one, not the buck.

Reply
Smirks June 27, 2013 at 4:12 pm

Blame game bullshit is always best, you get what you want without having to pay for it in negative publicity. While everyone is figuring out who to blame, they are missing the fact that everyone is to blame.

Reply
Gillon June 27, 2013 at 3:51 pm

Let me understand this: You have overwhelming Republican majorities in both the House and the Senate, and yet it is somehow Haley’s fault that the budget reflects excessive spending? If the General Assembly wants an austere budget, they should pass one, not the buck.

Reply
Smirks June 27, 2013 at 4:12 pm

Blame game bullshit is always best, you get what you want without having to pay for it in negative publicity. While everyone is figuring out who to blame, they are missing the fact that everyone is to blame.

Reply
jimlewisowb June 27, 2013 at 4:27 pm

House to Haley – whore
Haley to House – whores
House to Haley – big whore
Haley to House – I’ll have you know I lost 2 lbs. last week

Reply
jimlewisowb June 27, 2013 at 4:27 pm

House to Haley – whore
Haley to House – whores
House to Haley – big whore
Haley to House – I’ll have you know I lost 2 lbs. last week

Reply
Recovering Lobbyist June 27, 2013 at 5:45 pm

So if our fine legislators think the budget was so bad that it needed more vetoes, why did they adopt the thing in the first place?

Reply
Recovering Lobbyist June 27, 2013 at 5:45 pm

So if our fine legislators think the budget was so bad that it needed more vetoes, why did they adopt the thing in the first place?

Reply
Simple Simon June 27, 2013 at 8:03 pm

New SC Republican mantra:

SAVE US FROM OURSELVES!

Reply
Simple Simon June 27, 2013 at 8:03 pm

New SC Republican mantra:

SAVE US FROM OURSELVES!

Reply
scyankee June 27, 2013 at 8:17 pm

She stopped being a Tea PArty Fav. weeks after she won the primary.

Reply
scyankee June 27, 2013 at 8:17 pm

She stopped being a Tea PArty Fav. weeks after she won the primary.

Reply
? June 28, 2013 at 9:50 am

Being a child of the 70’s and living far outside of town, my mother used to plop a salad bowl on my head and simply trim around it for my hair cut.

This picture brings back the memories of the “good ole days” for me.

Reply
? June 28, 2013 at 9:50 am

Being a child of the 70’s and living far outside of town, my mother used to plop a salad bowl on my head and simply trim around it for my hair cut.

This picture brings back the memories of the “good ole days” for me.

Reply
Bill June 28, 2013 at 10:45 am

The people who are complaining are RINOS. They are actually Libertarians and that is how they should run. Then lets see if they get elected.

Reply
Bill June 28, 2013 at 10:45 am

The people who are complaining are RINOS. They are actually Libertarians and that is how they should run. Then lets see if they get elected.

Reply
Manray9 June 28, 2013 at 11:12 am

What does she stand for? Just herself?

Reply
Manray9 June 28, 2013 at 11:12 am

What does she stand for? Just herself?

Reply
Comrade1917 June 28, 2013 at 2:03 pm

Worry not … the USSA’s massive debt ($64 trillion) will crush the dollar.
USSA is in default now via money printing (QE).
Social unrest is forthcoming.

Reply
Comrade1917 June 28, 2013 at 2:03 pm

Worry not … the USSA’s massive debt ($64 trillion) will crush the dollar.
USSA is in default now via money printing (QE).
Social unrest is forthcoming.

Reply

Leave a Comment