Uncategorized

Dreamliners Still Glitching

Three 787 Dreamliners operated by United Airlines suffered mechanical errors resulting in aborted flights within the last six days – the latest problems to plague Boeing’s next generation passenger jet. According to the Associated Press, a Dreamliner traveling from Houston to Denver on Sunday had to return to its originating…

Three 787 Dreamliners operated by United Airlines suffered mechanical errors resulting in aborted flights within the last six days – the latest problems to plague Boeing’s next generation passenger jet.

According to the Associated Press, a Dreamliner traveling from Houston to Denver on Sunday had to return to its originating airport shortly after takeoff due to a brake indicator issue. Two days earlier, a Dreamliner traveling from London to Houston had to land in Newark due to an engine oil issue. Two days before that, a Dreamliner traveling from Denver to Tokyo had to land in Seattle due to an oil filter issue.

Obviously none of these problems are as serious as the lithium battery problems which resulted in the entire Dreamliner fleet being grounded from January through April of this year. The company never figured out what caused its batteries to catch fire, but it devised a solution to future conflagrations which satisfied the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

Even before the grounding, Boeing was facing immense pressure to turn a profit on the plane. Originally scheduled for delivery in May of 2008, numerous design, supply and delivery problems pushed Dreamliner’s deadline back more than three years – causing numerous cancellations.

The latest Dreamliner glitches don’t sound like much (in fact they could be nothing but a trio of faulty indicator lights), but even minor problems are amplified given the troubled past this aircraft has had.

Boeing makes 787s in Everett, Washington and in North Charleston, S.C. In fact South Carolina taxpayers have shelled out more than $1 billion in taxpayer subsidized incentives to “land” Boeing’s business. S.C. Gov. Nikki Haley is the company’s biggest cheerleader, referring to 787s as “Mack Daddy Planes.”

***

Related posts

Uncategorized

Woman is elected president of the world

John
Uncategorized

Man eats a hamburger from 1937

John
Uncategorized

Murdaugh Retrial Hearing: Interview With Bill Young

Will Folks

29 comments

Cleveland Steamer June 24, 2013 at 11:53 pm

Recent intelligence ops. in that state to the south suggest….do not hire people nicknamed Bubba.

Reply
Smirks June 25, 2013 at 8:15 am

What about Cletus and Jeb?

Reply
Finius Nullis June 25, 2013 at 12:28 pm

Or nicknames (these are real!) like Tater, Homebrew, and Popcorn – and a sexy gal known as Tits.

Reply
Cleveland Steamer June 24, 2013 at 11:53 pm

Recent intelligence ops. in that state to the south suggest….do not hire people nicknamed Bubba.

Reply
Smirks June 25, 2013 at 8:15 am

What about Cletus and Jeb?

Reply
Finius Nullis June 25, 2013 at 12:28 pm

Or nicknames (these are real!) like Tater, Homebrew, and Popcorn – and a sexy gal known as Tits.

Reply
Halfvast Conspirator June 24, 2013 at 11:54 pm

Everett planes? I think the SC planes went to Air India

Reply
Halfvast Conspirator June 24, 2013 at 11:54 pm

Everett planes? I think the SC planes went to Air India

Reply
GrandTango June 25, 2013 at 7:08 am

Dreamliners Still Glitching

And FITS Still Bitching…….

Reply
GreenvilleLwyr June 25, 2013 at 9:22 am

That’s pretty good, T. Nicely done.

Reply
fuel dumper June 25, 2013 at 7:54 am

I am wondering why they would return to the airport to land with braking issues with a plane that is full of fuel and much heavier than it will be when it lands in Denver?

Reply
Smirks June 25, 2013 at 8:17 am

Good catch! Maybe it is just protocol? Makes no sense though.

Reply
Finius Nullis June 25, 2013 at 12:25 pm

I thought the procedure was to dump fuel somewhere not harmful (?) or fly around to use it up. However, perhaps the braking problem may not have seemed too severe a danger.

Reply
fuel dumper June 25, 2013 at 7:54 am

I am wondering why they would return to the airport to land with braking issues with a plane that is full of fuel and much heavier than it will be when it lands in Denver?

Reply
Smirks June 25, 2013 at 8:17 am

Good catch! Maybe it is just protocol? Makes no sense though.

Reply
Finius Nullis June 25, 2013 at 12:25 pm

I thought the procedure was to dump fuel somewhere not harmful (?) or fly around to use it up. However, perhaps the braking problem may not have seemed too severe a danger.

Reply
hinman June 25, 2013 at 8:22 am

Why do we hear every minor glitch with the Dreamliner, but no one mentions the problems Airbus is having? Can you imagine the media coverage we would get if the Dreamliner had an engine explode on takeoff like this Airbus: http://gizmodo.com/holy-crap-its-good-this-airplane-wasnt-flying-when-it-570062797

Reply
Smirks June 25, 2013 at 8:28 am

Yikes. That explosion didn’t look extremely bad, but yeah, wouldn’t want to have to do an emergency landing like that.

Reply
CNSYD June 25, 2013 at 8:47 am

Because Sic Willie is anti Boeing.

Reply
hinman June 25, 2013 at 8:22 am

Why do we hear every minor glitch with the Dreamliner, but no one mentions the problems Airbus is having? Can you imagine the media coverage we would get if the Dreamliner had an engine explode on takeoff like this Airbus: http://gizmodo.com/holy-crap-its-good-this-airplane-wasnt-flying-when-it-570062797

Reply
Smirks June 25, 2013 at 8:28 am

Yikes. That explosion didn’t look extremely bad, but yeah, wouldn’t want to have to do an emergency landing like that.

Reply
CNSYD June 25, 2013 at 8:47 am

Because Sic Willie is anti Boeing.

Reply
CNSYD June 25, 2013 at 8:50 am

“conflagrations” Much like Sic Willie’s overuse of “scandal”, this word indicates “great and destructive fire”. Did that happen with the battery fires? Of course not.

Reply
CNSYD June 25, 2013 at 8:50 am

“conflagrations” Much like Sic Willie’s overuse of “scandal”, this word indicates “great and destructive fire”. Did that happen with the battery fires? Of course not.

Reply
CNSYD June 25, 2013 at 8:52 am

Sic Willie says that Boeing has had “numerous cancellations” for 787s. Maybe so, but per the MSM their order book stands at 900 after the Paris air show. Typical Sic Willie. Only half a story.

Reply
CNSYD June 25, 2013 at 8:52 am

Sic Willie says that Boeing has had “numerous cancellations” for 787s. Maybe so, but per the MSM their order book stands at 900 after the Paris air show. Typical Sic Willie. Only half a story.

Reply
Darth June 25, 2013 at 9:37 am

Still problems only with the union built Dreamliners… is there a connection?

Reply
Darth June 25, 2013 at 9:37 am

Still problems only with the union built Dreamliners… is there a connection?

Reply

Leave a Comment