Pop

Jessica Chastain Is A “Thirty”

It’s inexcusable, really … our failure to pick up on intoxicating scent that is Jessica Chastain, star of the new Kathryn Bigelow movie Zero Dark Thirty. Seriously … we love redheads. And have a freckle fetish. How on earth did Chastain manage to elude us for this long? We don’t…

It’s inexcusable, really … our failure to pick up on intoxicating scent that is Jessica Chastain, star of the new Kathryn Bigelow movie Zero Dark Thirty.

Seriously … we love redheads. And have a freckle fetish. How on earth did Chastain manage to elude us for this long? We don’t know. That’s a question that ranks right up there with “how did Osama bin Laden elude justice for so long?”

Clearly this website has wasted tons of ink on pop sluts like Lindsey Lohan when we could have been devoting attention to real actresses …

Chastain, a 36-year-old Sacramento, California native, slipped in underneath our radar like a pair of next generation stealth helicopters. In fact we watched The Help less than a year ago but for the life of us we honestly can’t say we remember anything about it (except it made us scratch at our white guilt itch again). We also loved The Debt but for the life of us couldn’t figure out why.

Now we know … it was Chastain.

The same cannot be said of Zero Dark Thirty, which achieves its riveting balance of tension and release almost exclusively on Chastain’s shoulders – eschewing political statements for gritty realism and graphic violence. We loved it – and Chastain – immediately. Her conventional attractiveness and rock hard body are nice to look at it, but she’s got the intangibles we dig … an aura that is only amplified by her ginger status.

Anyway, enjoy … and sorry for the delay. Although we think you will agree the wait was well worth it.

***

Related posts

Crime & Courts

Alleged ‘Southern Charm’ Hit-And-Run: The Incident Report

Will Folks
Pop

Prioleau Alexander: Inside America’s New Protest Anthem

E Prioleau Alexander
Pop

Prioleau Alexander: Hidden Messages In Film

E Prioleau Alexander

12 comments

AsianSuperfly March 25, 2013 at 3:39 pm

stunning.

Reply
AsianSuperfly March 25, 2013 at 3:39 pm

stunning.

Reply
lowcorider March 26, 2013 at 8:50 am

See, really a much better article than some made up bullshit about public schools. T&A over SAT any day.

Reply
Lowcorider March 26, 2013 at 8:50 am

See, really a much better article than some made up bullshit about public schools. T&A over SAT any day.

Reply
9" March 27, 2013 at 5:55 am

Zero Dark Thirty is fucking terrible. Oh that felt incredible to say “out-loud.” Goddamn, I have literally never walked out of a movie, but Zero Dark Thirty almost pushed me over the edge. It is actually difficult to have a movie full to bursting with controversy that literally bored me to tears. But what’s worse than boredom? This movie is remarkably stupid and poorly written and acted with all the care and craft of a high-school musical.

The movie opens with some guy torturing some other guy. We’re supposed to think that it’s rough and edgy… because the doe-eyed white lady is clearly concerned. She reminds the suspect to “not be a naughty liar.” So she’s a softie, right? But literally 2 minutes later, scruff beard-man talks to a colleague and says “She’s a raw new recruit, someone to fear.”

Wait. What?

The confusion increases as she spends the rest of the movie bouncing between RoboCop and scared almost… damsel in distress. She’s one of the most inconsistent characters I’ve ever seen, literally no hyperbole here. In the middle of the movie, she’s devastated(?) by another character dying… a character that she’s had two interactions with, the first of which was being mocked by her. The second they’re best friends? Sort of? Then she dies as a result of a monumentally stupid decision that’s telegraphed from a mile away (pro-tip, maybe don’t let terrorists into your military base.) Then she gets blown up. And as an audience we’re sad because we’re told to be sad. Doe-eyed girl is sad, so we’re EXTRA sad. She even starts drinking. *Gasp*

Then, from her sadness comes a moment that was so stupid that I almost left the theater. James Gandolfini goes “WELL HOW TO WE KNOW HE’S IN THIS SUPER-HOUSE? I DON’T BELIEVE THIS!” And then she goes “WELL IN THE MOTHER FUCKER THAT FOUND THIS HOUSE.” I did not make up that line. Some of this review is schtick, because I hated every minute of it, but that line actually happened. Doe-eyed looks into the camera and says “I’M THE MOTHER FUCKER THAT FOUND THIS HOUSE!” The audience in my theater ERUPTED with laughter.

This was the moment where I almost walked out of the theater. Once again, she shifts abruptly from soft to badass for no reason other than shitty writing and acting. It’s so bizarre, she doesn’t even change her tone. If she’d ended it with an innocent giggle and a “teehee!” it would not have seemed out of place. There’s a gigantic disconnect between her character and the events of the film. Saying someone is force to be reckoned with does not make them a force to be reckoned with.

As a brief aside, I brought this up following the viewing, and I was greeted with cat-calls and my friends calling me sexist. I’ll admit, this could sound sexist to an extent. In so many words, it sounds like I’m asserting that femininity is inherently weak. Not so, there are plenty of examples of femininity being strong, assertive, and a force to be reckoned with. Kill Bill is a terrific example of this. Beatrix is an unstoppable force, beautiful, yet vengeful. She’s doing everything she can to avenge her daughter’s supposed death, and yet at the end of the film, we see her as soft and loving.

And speaking of loving, there is literally no motivation for any character in the film. There’s not a personal relationship to speak of. People just act and we’re supposed to root for them because they’re white. Or monkeys. That’s not racist, that’s literally a plot-point in the film. We’re supposed to feel for monkeys who are killed off camera. Because they belong to beardy-guy. He actually says with his human mouth, “Goddamnit… they killed my monkeys…” BEAT. Like a human died. That’s how the scene plays out. Then later in the movie, doe-eyed girl is approached by a different younger, doe-eyeder girl, who then asks to have lunch with her. At which point she goes “I DON’T EAT OUT. TOO DANGEROUS.”

Why? She eats out several other times in the movie. Important plot points happen in restaurants. Like her character inexplicably being at the Marriot bombing in Pakistan. Bull shit. I do not believe that her character, who was supposedly based on a real “person” was there for a minute. It was so stupid and convenient. No, Kathryn Bigelow, you just wanted to blow up some brown people while we, as the audience, could watch doe-eyed girl react to the “horrors of war.”

Unlike The Hurt Locker, the cinematography is horrid. We just look at a thing, then look back at doe-eyed girl for how to feel. There’s not a single moment in the film where we, as an audience, are hit with anything remotely controversial. Is torture good? Just look at her face. Is bombing good? Just look at her face.

Which brings me to my largest point and biggest gripe. This movie is just fucking stupid, racist, and a chest-thumping. Yeah, we killed an 80 year-old man because he bombed us. We didn’t stop until that asshole was dead. Go us. Most pop culture that deals with this sort of thing is at least honest about it. It doesn’t purport to be anything more than a good-ol-fashioned “OOH-RAH!” This pretends to be art. At least Kid Rock has the good taste to just come out and say “Warrior” is a masturbatory exercise.

I elected not to use the names of the characters in this review because I didn’t need them. There are two characters that exist and the rest are wholly superfluous. We just look at the white girl and know she’s the good guy. It’s a thoughtless exercise filled with tedium and literally no tension.

The movie opens with the line “I own you.” And for most people watching and enjoying this film, that sentiment is spot-on.

Reply
Donald Cohen April 1, 2013 at 8:36 am

My goodness – it’s a shame this site doesn’t have a character limitation because — much like watching a train wreck, I read your poorly written post until I nearly vomited with laughter. Once you’ve graduated from high school or take the initiative to get your GED, perhaps you’ll be able to create a post that’s logical, persuasive and not filled with utter nonsense. By the way, the film you watched (but were probably too drunk to understand) will long live as a masterpiece. Perhaps you’re too stupid to grasp the subtle nuances in Chastain’s acting that have made her perhaps the very best actress since Meryl Streep.

Reply
mskabishop April 6, 2013 at 7:06 pm

The fact that your user name is ‘9″‘ proves that you are too stupid to understand the film… that, and the fact that your rant makes no sense.

Reply
9" March 27, 2013 at 5:55 am

Zero Dark Thirty is fucking terrible. Oh that felt incredible to say “out-loud.” Goddamn, I have literally never walked out of a movie, but Zero Dark Thirty almost pushed me over the edge. It is actually difficult to have a movie full to bursting with controversy that literally bored me to tears. But what’s worse than boredom? This movie is remarkably stupid and poorly written and acted with all the care and craft of a high-school musical.

The movie opens with some guy torturing some other guy. We’re supposed to think that it’s rough and edgy… because the doe-eyed white lady is clearly concerned. She reminds the suspect to “not be a naughty liar.” So she’s a softie, right? But literally 2 minutes later, scruff beard-man talks to a colleague and says “She’s a raw new recruit, someone to fear.”

Wait. What?

The confusion increases as she spends the rest of the movie bouncing between RoboCop and scared almost… damsel in distress. She’s one of the most inconsistent characters I’ve ever seen, literally no hyperbole here. In the middle of the movie, she’s devastated(?) by another character dying… a character that she’s had two interactions with, the first of which was being mocked by her. The second they’re best friends? Sort of? Then she dies as a result of a monumentally stupid decision that’s telegraphed from a mile away (pro-tip, maybe don’t let terrorists into your military base.) Then she gets blown up. And as an audience we’re sad because we’re told to be sad. Doe-eyed girl is sad, so we’re EXTRA sad. She even starts drinking. *Gasp*

Then, from her sadness comes a moment that was so stupid that I almost left the theater. James Gandolfini goes “WELL HOW TO WE KNOW HE’S IN THIS SUPER-HOUSE? I DON’T BELIEVE THIS!” And then she goes “WELL IN THE MOTHER FUCKER THAT FOUND THIS HOUSE.” I did not make up that line. Some of this review is schtick, because I hated every minute of it, but that line actually happened. Doe-eyed looks into the camera and says “I’M THE MOTHER FUCKER THAT FOUND THIS HOUSE!” The audience in my theater ERUPTED with laughter.

This was the moment where I almost walked out of the theater. Once again, she shifts abruptly from soft to badass for no reason other than shitty writing and acting. It’s so bizarre, she doesn’t even change her tone. If she’d ended it with an innocent giggle and a “teehee!” it would not have seemed out of place. There’s a gigantic disconnect between her character and the events of the film. Saying someone is force to be reckoned with does not make them a force to be reckoned with.

As a brief aside, I brought this up following the viewing, and I was greeted with cat-calls and my friends calling me sexist. I’ll admit, this could sound sexist to an extent. In so many words, it sounds like I’m asserting that femininity is inherently weak. Not so, there are plenty of examples of femininity being strong, assertive, and a force to be reckoned with. Kill Bill is a terrific example of this. Beatrix is an unstoppable force, beautiful, yet vengeful. She’s doing everything she can to avenge her daughter’s supposed death, and yet at the end of the film, we see her as soft and loving.

And speaking of loving, there is literally no motivation for any character in the film. There’s not a personal relationship to speak of. People just act and we’re supposed to root for them because they’re white. Or monkeys. That’s not racist, that’s literally a plot-point in the film. We’re supposed to feel for monkeys who are killed off camera. Because they belong to beardy-guy. He actually says with his human mouth, “Goddamnit… they killed my monkeys…” BEAT. Like a human died. That’s how the scene plays out. Then later in the movie, doe-eyed girl is approached by a different younger, doe-eyeder girl, who then asks to have lunch with her. At which point she goes “I DON’T EAT OUT. TOO DANGEROUS.”

Why? She eats out several other times in the movie. Important plot points happen in restaurants. Like her character inexplicably being at the Marriot bombing in Pakistan. Bull shit. I do not believe that her character, who was supposedly based on a real “person” was there for a minute. It was so stupid and convenient. No, Kathryn Bigelow, you just wanted to blow up some brown people while we, as the audience, could watch doe-eyed girl react to the “horrors of war.”

Unlike The Hurt Locker, the cinematography is horrid. We just look at a thing, then look back at doe-eyed girl for how to feel. There’s not a single moment in the film where we, as an audience, are hit with anything remotely controversial. Is torture good? Just look at her face. Is bombing good? Just look at her face.

Which brings me to my largest point and biggest gripe. This movie is just fucking stupid, racist, and a chest-thumping. Yeah, we killed an 80 year-old man because he bombed us. We didn’t stop until that asshole was dead. Go us. Most pop culture that deals with this sort of thing is at least honest about it. It doesn’t purport to be anything more than a good-ol-fashioned “OOH-RAH!” This pretends to be art. At least Kid Rock has the good taste to just come out and say “Warrior” is a masturbatory exercise.

I elected not to use the names of the characters in this review because I didn’t need them. There are two characters that exist and the rest are wholly superfluous. We just look at the white girl and know she’s the good guy. It’s a thoughtless exercise filled with tedium and literally no tension.

The movie opens with the line “I own you.” And for most people watching and enjoying this film, that sentiment is spot-on.

Reply
Donald Cohen April 1, 2013 at 8:36 am

My goodness – it’s a shame this site doesn’t have a character limitation because — much like watching a train wreck, I read your poorly written post until I nearly vomited with laughter. Once you’ve graduated from high school or take the initiative to get your GED, perhaps you’ll be able to create a post that’s logical, persuasive and not filled with utter nonsense. By the way, the film you watched (but were probably too drunk to understand) will long live as a masterpiece. Perhaps you’re too stupid to grasp the subtle nuances in Chastain’s acting that have made her perhaps the very best actress since Meryl Streep.

Reply
mskabishop April 6, 2013 at 7:06 pm

The fact that your user name is ‘9″‘ proves that you are too stupid to understand the film… that, and the fact that your rant makes no sense.

Reply
Josh March 31, 2013 at 3:22 pm

Ugh. Could I get a full refund if I took her back to Lowe’s?

Reply
Josh March 31, 2013 at 3:22 pm

Ugh. Could I get a full refund if I took her back to Lowe’s?

Reply

Leave a Comment