Uncategorized

It’s Good To Be Joe Biden

In addition to consequence-free groping, one of the other benefits of being Vice President is all thYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

In addition to consequence-free groping, one of the other benefits of being Vice President is all th
You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Related posts

CRIME & COURTS

Nancy Mace Pushes Feds To Take Over Federico Murder Case

FITSNews
Crossroads 2026

In Studio: Attorney General Candidate David Pascoe

Will Folks
SC Politics

Rom Reddy: Politician-Led DOGE Commissions A ‘Ruse’

Will Folks

12 comments

Right March 25, 2013 at 10:37 am

You always sound so jealous of government employees. You sure you don’t want back in? Is it the money or the supposed consequence-free groping you want more?

Reply
Right March 25, 2013 at 10:37 am

You always sound so jealous of government employees. You sure you don’t want back in? Is it the money or the supposed consequence-free groping you want more?

Reply
shifty henry March 25, 2013 at 10:59 am

VACANCY AVAILABLE ——– monthly, weekly, daily, and hourly rates upon request.

Reply
shifty henry March 25, 2013 at 10:59 am

VACANCY AVAILABLE ——– monthly, weekly, daily, and hourly rates upon request.

Reply
jimlewisowb March 25, 2013 at 11:15 am

“Biden…..hero of the working man”

Yep, he has the working man’s 6 covered

Reply
jimlewisowb March 25, 2013 at 11:15 am

“Biden…..hero of the working man”

Yep, he has the working man’s 6 covered

Reply
mark March 25, 2013 at 11:23 am

He is the problem. like all politicians they do not represent us!!

Reply
mark March 25, 2013 at 11:23 am

He is the problem. like all politicians they do not represent us!!

Reply
major major March 25, 2013 at 12:40 pm

Sounds like this sequester thing is really cramping Joe’s style.

Reply
major major March 25, 2013 at 12:40 pm

Sounds like this sequester thing is really cramping Joe’s style.

Reply
Smirks March 25, 2013 at 1:57 pm

I’m sure the Secret Service doesn’t consider the Motel 6 down by the ghetto for a reason when a trip is planned by the President or Vice President. Granted, I’m sure a luxury hotel isn’t exactly necessary either, but trips by the executives aren’t ever cheap. Keep in mind they likely rent the rooms near and over/under where the VP stays to ensure his safety, as well as other special accommodations.

Of course, do we have a breakdown of how these costs were incurred? Of course not, but that won’t stop the Rush Limbaughs and Weekly Standards of the world from gasping at travel expenses that are by their very nature going to be high. Break down the bill by what cost what and what is necessary and what isn’t, or show us comparable lodgings by previous VPs that were far cheaper when adjusted for inflation.

The clip they show says “Contract Award Dollar Amount,” so was this the lowest bid? How many other hotels bid on it?

Hell, maybe I’m wrong, maybe the trip could’ve been cheaper, but there seems to be a lot of questions that you and your source (The Weekly Standard) aren’t asking, and likely due to the fact that it doesn’t fit your narrative to question a perfectly good talking point.

Reply
Smirks March 25, 2013 at 1:57 pm

I’m sure the Secret Service doesn’t consider the Motel 6 down by the ghetto for a reason when a trip is planned by the President or Vice President. Granted, I’m sure a luxury hotel isn’t exactly necessary either, but trips by the executives aren’t ever cheap. Keep in mind they likely rent the rooms near and over/under where the VP stays to ensure his safety, as well as other special accommodations.

Of course, do we have a breakdown of how these costs were incurred? Of course not, but that won’t stop the Rush Limbaughs and Weekly Standards of the world from gasping at travel expenses that are by their very nature going to be high. Break down the bill by what cost what and what is necessary and what isn’t, or show us comparable lodgings by previous VPs that were far cheaper when adjusted for inflation.

The clip they show says “Contract Award Dollar Amount,” so was this the lowest bid? How many other hotels bid on it?

Hell, maybe I’m wrong, maybe the trip could’ve been cheaper, but there seems to be a lot of questions that you and your source (The Weekly Standard) aren’t asking, and likely due to the fact that it doesn’t fit your narrative to question a perfectly good talking point.

Reply

Leave a Comment